Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A multi-label learning prediction model for heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation based on expert knowledge of disease duration

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are prone to complications such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which accelerates the progress of the disease and can lead to death. It is of great practical importance to predict the onset timing and probability of HFpEF, which can guide the personalized treatment of patients with AF and improve their survival rate. However, there are no models for predicting HFpEF in patients with AF at present. A multi-label learning prediction model based on expert knowledge of disease duration is proposed in this paper to achieve accurate prediction of HFpEF in patients with AF. First, the expert knowledge of the relationship between the duration of disease progression and outcome is adopted to divided the duration of AF disease into different periods. Next, multi-label decision tree models were used to build different multi-label prediction models for each stage. With the multi-label design, the model can learn the intrinsic correlation between different labels and achieve dual-task prediction of HFpEF attack time and probability. Finally, the results from different periods were fused and output. The proposed method considers the time dependence of medical data and the development pattern of the disease, which realizes 0.0352 hloss, 0.8571 micro-F1 score, and 0.90 average micro-AUC. The experimental results show that the proposed model achieved better prediction of onset time and outcomes in HFpEF patients, which will help the prognosis and personalize the treatment of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Singh JP, Thomas SS (2017) Atrial fibrillation and Herat failure prevention. JACC Heart Fail 5(1):53–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Packer M, Lam CSP, Lund LH, Redfield MM (2020) Interdependence of atrial fibrillation and heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction reflects a common underlying atrial and ventricular myopathy. Circulation 141(1):4–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruddox V, Sandven I, Munkhaugen J, Skattebu J, Edvardsen T, Otterstad JE (2017) Atrial fibrillation and the risk for myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 24(14):1555–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karnik AA (2019) Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation and heart failure: a growing and important problem. Cardiol Clin 37(2):119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ng R et al (2020) Development and Validation of the Chronic Disease Population Risk Tool (CDPoRT) to Predict Incidence of Adult Chronic Disease. JAMA Netw Open 3(6):e204669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stockdill ML, Patrician PA, Bakitas M (2019) Understanding and measuring symptom burden in heart failure: a concept analysis. West J Nurs Res 41(10):1423–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan MA, Satchiyhananda DK, Mamas MA (2016) The importance of interactions between atrial fibrillation and heart failure. CEM Cardiology 16:272–276

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin-Perez M et al (2016) Incidence and risk factors for atrial fibrillation in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 17(8):608–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ko D, Schnabel RB, Trinquart L, Benjamin EJ (2017) The changing landscape of atrial fibrillation: time to target heart failure prevention. JACC Heart Fail 5(8):561–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Slee A, Saksena S (2020) Impact of initial heart failure emergence on clinical outcomes of atrial fibrillation patients in the AFFIRM trial. Am Heart J 220:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tripathy RK, Paternina MRA, Arrieta JG, Zamora-Méndez A, Naik GR (2019) Automated detection of congestive heart failure from electrocardiogram signal using Stockwell transform and hybrid classification scheme. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 173:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang W et al (2020) Automated intra-patient and inter-patient coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure detection using EFAP-net. Knowl-Based Syst 201-202:106083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Almedia FAD et al (2018) Early warning systems for the management of chronic heart failure: a systematic literature review of cost-effectiveness models. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 18(2):161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blecker S, Katz SD, Horwitz LI, Kuperman G, Park H, Gold A, Sontag D (2016) Comparison of approaches for heart failure case identification from electronic health record data. JAMA Cardiol 1(9):1014–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Domanski M (2016) Prognosis in atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 27(8):895–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Cha SS, Bailey KR, Abhayaratna W, Seward JB, Iwasaka T, Tsang TSM (2006) Incidence and mortality risk of congestive heart failure in atrial fibrillation patients: a community-based study over two decades. Eur Heart J 27(8):936–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Potpara TS, Polovina MM, Licina MM, Marinkovic JM, Lip GYH (2013) Predictors and prognostic implications of incident heart failure following the first diagnosis of atrial fibrillation in patients with structurally normal hearts: the Belgrade atrial fibrillation study. Eur J Heart Fail 15(4):415–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kotecha D, Lam CSP, van Veldhuisen DJ, van Gelder IC, Voors AA, Rienstra M (2016) Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: vicious twins. J Am Coll Cardiol 68(20):2217–2228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Angraal S, Mortazavi BJ, Gupta A, Khera R, Ahmad T, Desai NR, Jacoby DL, Masoudi FA, Spertus JA, Krumholz HM (2020) Machine learning prediction of mortality and hospitalization in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail 8(1):12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ishaq A, Sadiq S, Umer M, Ullah S, Mirjalili S, Rupapara V, Nappi M (2021) Improving the prediction of heart failure patients’ survival using SMOTE and effective data mining techniques. IEEE Access 9:39707–39716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li B et al (2019) Computer-aided diagnosis and clinical trials of cardiovascular diseases based on artificial intelligence Technologies for Risk-Early Warning Model. J Med Syst 43(7):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yapp EKY, Li X, Lu WF, Tan PS (2020) Comparison of base classifiers for multi-label learning. Neurocomputing 394:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Adiyeke E, Baydogan MG (2020) The benefits of target relations: a comparison of multitask extensions and classifier chains. Pattern Recogn 107:107507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang X, Yang Y, Xu Y, Chen Q, Wang H, Gao H (2020) Predicting hypoglycemic drugs of type 2 diabetes based on weighted rank support vector machine. Knowl-Based Syst 197:105868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang J, Zhang M, Yu S (2021) A novel rhinitis prediction method for class imbalance. Biomed Signal Process Control 69:102821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jamthikar A et al (2020) A machine learning framework for risk prediction of multi-label cardiovascular events based on focused carotid plaque B-mode ultrasound: a Canadian study. Comput Biol Med 140:105102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yap XH, Raymer M (2021) Multi-label classification and label dependence in in silico toxicity prediction. Toxicol in Vitro 74:105157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ge R, Zhang R, Wang P (2020) Prediction of chronic diseases with multi-label neural network. IEEE Access 8:138210–138216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Maxwell A et al (2017) Deep learning architectures for multi-label classification of intelligent health risk prediction. BMC Bioinform 18(14):121–131

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou C, Li A, Hou A, Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Dai P, Wang F (2020) Modeling methodology for early warning of chronic heart failure based on real medical big data. Expert Syst Appl 151:113361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kanwar MK, Lohmueller LC, Kormos RL, Teuteberg JJ, Rogers JG, Lindenfeld JA, Bailey SH, McIlvennan CK, Benza R, Murali S, Antaki J (2018) A Bayesian model to predict survival after left ventricular assist device implantation. JACC Heart Fail 6(9):771–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaur I, Doja MN, Ahmad T (2020) Time-range based sequential mining for survival prediction in prostate cancer. J Biomed Inform 110:103550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kate RJ, Nadig R (2017) Stage-specific predictive models for breast cancer survivability. Int J Med Inform 97:304–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Simsek S, Kursuncu U, Kibis E, AnisAbdellatif M, Dag A (2020) A hybrid data mining approach for identifying the temporal effects of variables associated with breast cancer survival. Expert Syst Appl 139:112863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moyano JM et al (2018) Review of ensembles of multi-label classifiers: models, experimental study and prospects. Inf Fusion 4:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen YN, Weng W, Wu SX, Chen BH, Fan YL, Liu JH (2021) An efficient stacking model wit label selection for multi-label classification. Appl Intell 51:308–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tarekegn AN, Giacbini M, Michalak K (2021) A review of methods for imbalance d multi-label classification. Pattern Recogn 118:10965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang Y, Li H, Yu X (2021) A multiview feature fusion model for heartbeat classification. Physiol Meas 42(6):065003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61973067, 61903071); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (N2104031).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Youhe Huang and Rongfeng Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, No. 11 St. 3, Wenhua Road, Heping District, Shenyang, 110819, People’s Republic of China

    Youhe Huang, Hongru Li, Xia Yu & Songbai Liu

  2. Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No. 222, Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, People’s Republic of China

    Rongfeng Zhang, Yunlong Xia & Yiheng Yang

Authors
  1. Youhe Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rongfeng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hongru Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yunlong Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xia Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Songbai Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yiheng Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongru Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest to this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Y., Zhang, R., Li, H. et al. A multi-label learning prediction model for heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation based on expert knowledge of disease duration. Appl Intell 53, 20047–20058 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-023-04487-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-023-04487-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation