Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A distributed architecture for supervision of autonomous multi-robot missions

Application to air-sea scenarios

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Realizing long-term autonomous missions involving teams of heterogeneous robots is a challenge. It requires mechanisms to make robots react to disturbances or failures that will arise during the mission, while trying to successfully achieve the mission in cooperation. This paper presents HiDDeN, a distributed deliberative architecture that manages the execution of a hierarchical plan. This plan has initially been computed offline, ensuring some military operational constraints of the mission. Each robot’s supervisor then executes its own part of the plan, and reacts to failures using a hierarchical repair approach. This hierarchical repair has been designed with the sake of ensuring operational constraints, while reducing the need of communication between robots, as communication may be intermittent or even nonexistent when the robots operate in completely separate environments. HiDDeN’s robustness and scalability is evaluated with simulations. Experiments with an autonomous helicopter and an autonomous underwater vehicle have been realized and are presented as the defining point of our contribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Alami, R., Chatila, R., Fleury, S., Ghallab, M., & Ingrand, F. (1998). An architecture for autonomy. International Journal of Robotics Research, Special Issue on Integrated Architectures for Robot Control and Programming (IJRR), 17(4), 315–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, A.M.G., Aguiar, A.P., & Pascoal, A. (2012). A new approach to multi-robot harbour patrolling: theory and experiments. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Vilamoura, Portugal

  • Atay, N., & Bayazit, O. (2007). Emergent task allocation for mobile robots. In International sympositum on robotics: Science and systems (RSS), Atlanta, GA, USA

  • Barbier, M., Barrouil, C., Gabard, J.F., & Zanon, G. (2006). ProCoSA: a Petri net based software package for autonomous system supervision. In International conference on application and theory of petri nets and other models of concurrency (ATPN), Turku, Finland

  • Barbier, M., Cao, H., Lacroix, S., Lesire, C., Teichteil-Königsbuch, F., & Tessier, C. (2009). Decision issues for multiple heterogeneous vehicles in uncertain environments. In National conference on control architectures of robots (CAR), Toulouse, France

  • Barbier, M., Gabard, J. F., Bertholom, A., & Dupas, Y. (2011). An onboard software decisional architecture for Rapid Environmental Assessment missions. In IFAC world congress, Milan, Italy

  • Belbachir, A., Ingrand, F., & Lacroix, S. (2012). A cooperative architecture for target localization using multiple AUVs. Intelligent service robotics (Vol. 5(2)).

  • Benjamin, M. R., Schmidt, H., Newman, P. M., & Leonard, J. J. (2010). Nested autnomy for unmanned marine vehicles with MOOS-IvP. Journal of Field Robotics (JFR), 27(6), 834–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinon-Arranz, L., Pascoal, A., & Aguiar, P. (2014) Adaptive leader-follower formation control of autonomous marine vehicles. In IEEE conference on decision and control, Los Angeles, CA, USA

  • Chaimowicz, L., Sugar, T., Kumar, V., & Campos, M. (2001). An architecture for tightly coupled multi-robot cooperation. In International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Seoul, Korea

  • Chanel, C.C., Teichteil-Königsbuch, F., & Lesire, C. (2013). Multi-target detection and recognition by UAVs Using Online POMDPs. In AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI), Bellevue, WA, USA.

  • Chatzichristofis, S., Kapoutsis, A., Kosmatopoulos, E. B., Doitsidis, L., Rovas, D., & Borges de Sousa, J. (2012). The NOPTILUS project: Autonomous multi-AUV navigation for exploration of unknown environments. In IFAC workshop on navigation, guidance and control of underwater vehicles (NGCUV), Porto, Portugal

  • Das, J., Harvey, J., Py, F., Vathsangam, H., Graham, R., Rajan, K., & Sukhatme, G.S. (2013). Hierarchical probabilistic regression for AUV-based adaptative sampling of marine phenomena. In International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Karlsruhe, Germany

  • De Cubber, G., Doroftei, D., Baudoin, Y., Serrano, D., Chintamani, K., Sabino, R., & Ourevitch, S. (2012). ICARUS: An EU-FP7 project Providing Unmanned Search and Rescue Tools. In IROS workshop on robots and sensors integration in future rescue INformation system (ROSIN), Vilamoura-Algarve, Portugal

  • Echeverria, G., Lemaignan, S., Degroote, A., Lacroix, S., Karg, M., Koch, P., Lesire, C., & Stinckwich, S. (2012) Simulating complex robotic scenarios with morse. In International conference on simulation, modeling, and programming for autonomous robots (SIMPAR), Tsukuba, Japan

  • Erol, K., Hendler, J., & Nau, D. (1994). HTN planning: complexity and expressivity. In AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI), Seattle, WA, USA

  • Fazil Ayan, N., Kuter, U., Yaman, F., & Goldman, R. (2007). HOTRiDE: hierarchical ordered task replanning in dynamic environments. In International conference on automated planning and scheduling (ICAPS), Providence, RI, USA

  • Ferri, G., & Djapic, V. (2013). Adaptive mission planning for cooperative autonomous maritime vehicles. In International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Karlsruhe, Germany

  • Gancet, J., Hattenberger, G., Alami, R., & Lacroix, S. (2005). Task Planning and control for a multi-AUV system: architecture and algorithms. In International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Edmonton, AB, Canada

  • Gateau, T., Lesire, C., & Barbier, M. (2012). Knowledge base for planning, execution and plan repair. In International conference on automated planning and scheduling (ICAPS) workshop on planning and execution (PlanEx), Altibaia, Brasil

  • Gateau, T., Lesire, C., & Barbier, M. (2013). HiDDeN: Cooperative plan execution and repair for heterogeneous robots in dynamic environments. In International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Tokyo, Japan

  • Hollinger, G.A., Englot, B., Hover, F., Mitra, U., & Sukhatme, G.S. (2012). Uncertainty-driven view planning for underwater inspection. In International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Saint-Paul, MN, USA

  • Kurowski, M., Korte, H., & Lampe, B.P. (2012). Search-and-rescue-operation with an autonomously acting rescue boat. In International conference on autonomous and intelligent systems, Aveiro, Portugal

  • Luzeaux, D., & Dalgalarrondo, A. (2001). HARPIC, an Hybrid Architecture Based on Representations, Perception, and Intelligent Control: A Way to Provide Autonomy to Robots. In The international conference on computational science (ICCS), London, UK

  • Marques, E., Ribeiro, M., Pinto, J., Sousa, J., & Martins, F. (2015). Towards programmable coordination of unmanned vehicle networks. In IFAC workshop on navigation, guidance and control of underwater vehicles (NGCUV), Girona, Spain

  • McGann, C., Py, F., Rajan, K., Thomas, H., Henthorn, R., & McEwen, R. (2008). A deliberative architecture for AUV control. In International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Pasadena, CA, USA

  • Mukhopadhyay, S., Wang, C., Bradshaw, S., Bazie, V., Maxon, S., Hicks, L., Patterson, M., & Zhang, F. (2012). Controller performance of marine robots in reminiscent oil surveys. In International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Vilamoura, Portugal

  • Muscettola, N., Dorais, G., Fry, C., Levinson, R., & Plaunt, C. (2002). IDEA: Planning at the core of autonomous reactive agents. In International NASA workshop on planning and scheduling for space, Houston, TX, USA

  • Nau, D., Au, T. C., Ilhami, O., Kuter, U., Murdock, W., Wu, D., et al. (2003). SHOP2: an HTN planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 20, 379–404.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Paolucci, M., Shehory, O., & Sycara, K. (2000). Interleaving planning and execution in a multiagent team planning environment. Linköping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Sciences, 5(18),

  • Parker, L. (1998). ALLIANCE: An Architecture for Fault Tolerant Multi-Robot Cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14, 220–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L., Kannan, B., Tang, F., & Bailey, M. (2004). Tightly-coupled navigation assistance in heterogeneous multi-robot teams. In International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Sendai, Japan

  • Pinto, J., Dias, P., Martins, R., Fortuna, J., Marques, E., & Sousa, J. (2013a). The LSTS toolchain for networked vehicle systems. In OCEANS, San Diego, CA, USA

  • Pinto, J., Faria, M., Fortuna, J., Martins, R., Sousa, J., Queiroz, N., et al. (2013b). Chasing fish: Tracking and control in a autonomous multi-vehicle real-world experiment. In OCEANS, San Diego, CA, USA

  • Rooker, M., & Birk, A. (2007). Multi-robot exploration under the constraints of wireless networking. Control Engineering Practice, 15(4), 435–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, T., & Schmidt, H. (2010). Unified command and control for heterogeneous marine sensor networks. Journal of Field Robotics (JFR), 27(6), 876–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shkuri, F., Xu, A., Meghjani, M., Higuera, J.C.G., Girdhar, Y., Gigure, P., Dey, B.B., Li, J., Kalmbach, A., Prahacs, C., Turgeon, K., Rekleitis, I., & Dudek, G. (2012). Multi-domain monitoring of marine environments using a heterogeneous robot team. In International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Vilamoura, Portugal

  • Smith, R. (1980). The Contract Net Protocol: high-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 29, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soetens, P., & Bruyninckx, H. (2005). Realtime Hybrid Task-Based Control for Robots and Machine Tools. In International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Barcelona, Spain

  • Sotzing, C., Johnson, N., & Lane, D. (2008). Improving multi-AUV coordination with hierarchical blackboard-based plan representation. In Workshop of the UK planning and scheduling special interest group (PlanSIG), Edinburgh, UK

  • Vidal, R., Shakernia, O., Kim, H., Shim, D., & Sastry, S. (2002). Probabilistic pursuit-evasion games: Theory, implementation and experimental evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 18, 662–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Y., Lesire, C., Piquereau, A., Fabiani, P., Sanfourche, M., & Le Besnerais, G. (2010). The Onera ReSSAC unmanned autonomous helicopter: Visual air-to-ground target tracking in an urban environment. In AHS Forum, Phoenix, AZ, USA

  • Xiang, X., Jouvencel, B., & Parodi, O. (2010). Coordinated formation control of multiple autnomous underwater vehicles for pipeline inspection. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 7(1), 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Parker, L.E (2010). IQ-ASyMTRe: Synthesizing coalition formation and execution for tightly-coupled multirobot tasks with sensor constraints. In International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Taipei, Taiwan

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thanks the French Defense procurement agency DGA for the funding of the ACTION project and for their strong involvement in the air-sea scenarios with developments and implementation on Daurade AUV and Spartan USV and for provision of the test site.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ONERA – The French Aerospace Lab, 2, av. Edouard Belin, 31000, Toulouse, France

    Charles Lesire, Guillaume Infantes & Magali Barbier

  2. Institut Supérieur de l’Aéronautique et de l’Espace (ISAE), 10, av. Edouard Belin, 31055, Toulouse, France

    Thibault Gateau

Authors
  1. Charles Lesire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guillaume Infantes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thibault Gateau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Magali Barbier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Lesire.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lesire, C., Infantes, G., Gateau, T. et al. A distributed architecture for supervision of autonomous multi-robot missions. Auton Robot 40, 1343–1362 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-016-9603-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-016-9603-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation