Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Rapid assessment of biodiversity using acoustic indices

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolutionary success of a species is linked to its ability to communicate. Auditory, optic and olfactory systems are biological communication channels. Compared to the latter two, auditory systems are less impeded by physical obstructions. Successful species have effectively articulated this to their advantage. Decoding the acoustic dynamics of a landscape can ingeniously be crafted as a rapid tool to assess biological diversity. Here, we present results of the acoustic analysis carried out in three contrasting soundscapes in Kerala, India. Representative sound samples were recorded at Ernakulam, Kerala, India using Marantz PMD 661 III sonic recorder from 6.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. (IST) from an urban park [Hill Palace Museum (L1)], a sacred grove [Iringole Kavu (L2)], and a legally protected area Salim Ali Bird Sanctuary (L3). Acoustic characteristics of these sites expressed as Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI), Acoustic Diversity Index (ADI), Acoustic Evenness Index (AEI), Bioacoustic Index (BI) and Normalized Difference Soundscape Index (NDSI) were related to corresponding avian diversity. The objective finding reveals the distinctiveness of sonic characteristics and the status of diversity in each soundscape. Rapid assessment of biodiversity using acoustic indices is a prospective option that can be adopted as a means to generate biodiversity indicators of Sustainable Develeopment Goals (SDGs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aji CP (2012) Biodiversity and ecological status of iringolekavu-a sacred grove at ernakulam district in Kerala 5:134–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Alois P, Cheng V (2007) Key stone species extinction. Overview. http://www.arlingtoninstitute.org/wbp/species-extintion/443

  • Barber JR, Crooks KR, Fristrup KM (2010) The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 25:180–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boelman NT, Asner GP, Hart PJ, Martin RE (2007) Multi-trophic invasion resistance in Hawaii: bioacoustics, field surveys, and airborne remote sensing. Ecol Appl 17:2137–2144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Depraetere M, Pavoine S, Jiguet F, Gasc A, Duvail S, Sueur J (2012) Monitoring animal diversity using acoustic indices: implementation in a temperate woodland. Ecol Indic 13:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parnesan C, Changnon SA, Karl TR, Mearns LO (2000) Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289:2068–2074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrass AJ, Rennett P, Williams C, Titheridge H, Jones KE (2017) Biases of acoustic indices measuring biodiversity in urban areas. Ecol Indic 83:169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher H (1953) Speech and hearing in communication. Van Nostrand, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage SH, Napoletano B, Cooper MC (2001) Assessment of ecosystem biodiversity by acoustic diversity indices. J Acoust Soc Am 109(5):2430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage SH, Joo W, Kasten EP, Fox J, Biswas S (2015) Acoustic observations in agricultural landscapes. The ecology of agricultural ecosystems: long-term research on the path to sustainability. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 360–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasten EP, Gage SH, Fox J, Joo W (2012) The remote environmental assessment laboratory’s acoustic library: an archive for studying soundscape ecology. Ecol Inform 12:50–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerala Forest and Wildlife Department (2015). http://www.forest.kerala.gov.in/index.php/wildlife/2015-03-16-09-50-24/2015-06-26-09-04-29/thattekkadu-bird-sanctuary

  • Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (1996) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Yu D, Xiong W, Wang Q, Tu M (2006) Testing the higher-taxon approach: a case study of aquatic marcophytes in China’s northwest arid zone and its implications for conservation. Biodivers Conserv 15(11):3401–3416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligges U (2009) TuneR: analysis of music. http://r-forge.rproject.org/projects/tuner/

  • Mumthaz KM, John George M (2017) Occurrence and significance of woodpeckers in Salim Ali Bird Sanctuary, Thattekkad, Kerala. J Glob Biosci 6(10):5301–5307

    Google Scholar 

  • Obrist MK, Pavan G, Sueur J, Riede K, Llusia D, Marquez R (2010) Bioacoustics approaches in biodiversity inventories. Abc Taxa 8:68–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1993) A possible method for the rapid assessment of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 7(3):562–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson CR, Dorcas ME (1994) Automated data acquisition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieretti N, Farina A, Morri D (2011) A new methodology to infer the singing activity of an avian community: the Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI). Ecol Indic 11:868–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pijanowski B, Farina A, Gage S, Dumyahn S, Krause B (2011a) What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landsc Ecol 26:1213–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pijanowski B, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Dumyahn SL, Farina A, Krause BL, Napoletano BM, Gage SH, Pieretti N (2011b) Soundscape ecology: the science of sound in the landscape. Bioscience 61:203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi J, Gage SH, Joo W, Napoletano B, Biswas S (2008) Soundscape characteristics of an environment: a new ecological indicator of ecosystem health. Wetland and water resource modeling and assessment. CRC Press, New York, pp 201–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards DG, Wiley RH (1980) Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implication for animal communication. Am Nat 115(3):381–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer RM (1977) The soundscape: our sonic environment and the tuning of the world. Destiny Books, Rochester

    Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn H, Ripmeester EAP (2008) Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation. Mol Ecol 17:72–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sueur J, Pavoine S, Hamerlynck O, Duvail S (2008) Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal. PLoS ONE 3(12):e4065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sueur J, Farina A, Gasc A, Pieretti N, Pavoine S (2014) Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessment and landscape investigation. Acta Acust United Acust 100:772–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugathan R, Verghese AP (1996) A review of the birds of Thattakad Bird Sanctuary, Kerala. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 93:487–506

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing (version 3.1.2) (computer program). http://www.R-project.org

  • Towsey M, Wimmer J, Williamson I, Roe P (2014) The use of acoustic indices to determine avian species richness in audio-recordings of the environment. Ecol Inform 21:110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.00

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truax B (1984) Acoustic communication. Ablex Publishing, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Truax B (1999) Handbook for acoustic ecology, 2nd edn. Cambridge Street Publishing, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzoulas K, James P (2010) Making biodiversity measures accessible to non-specialists: an innovative method for rapid assessment of urban biodiversity. Urban Ecosyst 13(1):113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Pijanowski BC (2014). Package ‘soundecology’. Soundscape Ecology (Version 1.1.1) (computer program). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/soundecology/index.html

  • Villanueva-Rivera L, Pijanowski B, Doucette J, Pekin B (2011) A primer of acoustic analysis for landscape ecologists. Landsc Ecol 26:1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9636-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank Dr. R. Sugathan, Ornithologist, Salim Ali Bird Sanctuary, Thattekkad, Mr. Rajesh Junior Ornithologist, Salim Ali Bird Sanctuary, Thattekkad, Mr. Mani, Forest Watcher, Salim Ali Bird Sanctuary, Thattekkad, and Mr. Dineshan, Charge Officer, Hill Palace Museum, Ernakulam for providing assistance and support for the field survey. We also thank Prof. Saji Gopinath, Director, IIITM-K for supporting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Jaishanker.

Additional information

Communicated by M.D. Behera, S.K. Behera and S. Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajan, S.C., Athira, K., Jaishanker, R. et al. Rapid assessment of biodiversity using acoustic indices. Biodivers Conserv 28, 2371–2383 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1673-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1673-0

Keywords