Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Applying Ethical Theories: Interpreting and Responding to Student Plagiarism

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the tremendous proliferation of student plagiarism involving the Internet, the purpose of this study is to determine which theory of ethical reasoning students invoke when defending their transgressions: deontology, utilitarianism, rational self-interest, Machiavellianism, cultural relativism, or situational ethics. Understanding which theory of ethical reasoning students employ is critical, as preemptive steps can be taken by faculty to counteract this reasoning and prevent plagiarism.

Additionally, it has been demonstrated that unethical behavior in school can lead to unethical behavior in business; therefore, correcting unethical behavior in school can have a positive impact on organizational ethics. To meet this objective, a content analysis was conducted on the written records of students formally charged with plagiarizing at a large West Coast university. Each case was classified according to the primary ethical reasoning that the student used to justify plagiarism. Results indicate that students predominately invoke deontology, situational ethics, and Machiavellianism. Based on these findings, specific recommendations are offered to curb plagiarism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allmon D. E., Page D., Roberts R. (2000). Determinants of Perceptions of Cheating: Ethical Orientation, Personality and Demographics. Journal of Business Ethics 23(4):411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altschuler, G. C.: 2001, January 7, ‚Battling the Cheats’, The New York Times online. Section 4A, p. 15. Retrieved July 20, 2004 from Lexis-Nexis database

  • Aronson E., Brewer M. B., Carlsmith J. M. (1985). Experimentation and Social Psychology. In: Lindzey J., Aronson E. (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp. 441–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore R. B. (1987). Building a Model System. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth P., Bannister P. (1997). Guilty in Whose Eyes? University Students’ Perceptions of Cheating and Plagiarism in Academic Work and Assessment. Studies in Higher Education 22(2):187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auer N. J., Krupar E. M. (2001). Mouse Click Plagiarism: The Role of Technology in Plagiarism and the Librarian’s Role in Combating It. Library Trends 49(3):415–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer E. L. (1990). Scholarship Revisited: Priorities of the Professoriate. Carnegie Endowment for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann J. (2002). Moral Reflection Differences among Norwegian Business Students. A Presentation and Discussion of the Findings. Teaching Business Ethics 6(1):83–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, H.: 2003, March 26, ‚Big Companies Teach Business Ethics to Employees’, Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, p. 1

  • Bugeja, M.: 2001, November 26, ‚Collegiate Copycats’, Editor & Publisher. Retrieved May 20, 2002 from ProQuest database

  • Cavanagh G., Moberg D., Velasquez M. (1981). The Ethics of Organizational Politics. Academy of Management Review 6(3):363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Academic Integrity (CAI): 2005, CAI Research. Retrieved January 19, 2005 from http://www.academicintegrity.org/cai_research.asp

  • Center for Academic Integrity (CAI): 2002–2003, CAI Research. Retrieved July 31, 2004 from http://www.academicintegrity.org/cai_research.asp

  • Center for Academic Integrity (CAI): 1999, CAI Research. Retrieved January 19, 2005 from http://www.academicintegrity.org/cai_research.asp

  • Christie R., Geiss F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark I. (1996). Taking a Stand. (2 edn) Harper Collins College Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. and E. Kiss: 2000, ‚Tips for Discouraging Plagiarism. What Can We Do About Student Cheating? About Campus’. Retrieved September 12, 2004 from http://www.academicintegrity.org/resources_inst.asp

  • Coleman N., Mahaffey T. (2000). Business Student Ethics: Selected Predictors of Attitudes Toward Cheating. Teaching Business Ethics 4(2):121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane F. (2004). The Teaching of Business Ethics: An Imperative at Business Schools. Journal of Education for Business 79(3):149–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Crown D. F., Spiller M. S. (1998). Learning from the Literature on Collegiate Cheating: A Review of Empirical Research. Journal of Business Ethics 17(6):683–700

    Google Scholar 

  • De George R. T. (1990). Business Ethics, (3rd edn) MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Did you know? 2004: Turnitin, Research Resources. Retrieved July 16, 2004 from http://www.turnitin.com/research_site/e_what_is_plagiarism.html

  • Dilevko J., Harris R. M. (1997). Information Technology and Social Relations: Portrayals of Gender Roles in High Tech Product Advertisements. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48(8):718–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T. (1989). The Ethics of International Business. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T., Dunfee T. W. (1994). Towards a Unified Conception of Business Ethics, Integrative Social Contracts Theory. Academy of Management Review 19(2):252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eble K. E., McKeachie W. J. (1985). Improving Undergraduate Education Through Faculty Development. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell O. C., Gresham L. G. (1985). A Contingency Model Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision-Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing 49(2):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fialkoff, F. and E. St. Lifer: 2002, ‚Bringing Order to an Unruly Web’, Library Journal, Spring, 2–5

  • Flynn, L. J.: 2001, September 10, ‚The Wonder Years: Homework is Free Online’, The New York Times online. Retrieved July 20, 2004 from Lexis-Nexis database

  • Frankena W. (1973). Ethics. (2nd edn) Prentice Hall, Englewood NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith S., Stephenson H. B. (1993). Decision Rules Used by Male and Female Business Students in Making Ethical Value Judgments: Another Look. Journal of Business Ethics 12(3):227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granitz N. (2003). Individual, Social and Organizational Sources of Sharing and Variation in the Ethical Reasoning of Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 4(2):101–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groark M., Oblinger D., Choa M. (2001). Term Paper Mills, Anti-plagiarism Tools, and Academic Integrity. EDUCAUSE Review 36(5):40–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover S. L., Hui C. (1994). The Influence of Role Conflict and Self-interest on Lying in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 13(4):293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair J. F. Jr. (1991). Improving Marketing Education in the 1990s. Marketing Education Review 1(1):23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.: 2002, ‚Anti-plagiarism Strategies for Research Papers’, Virtual Salt. Retrieved September 12, 2004 from http://www.virtualsalt.com/antiplag.htm

  • Hasnas J. (1998). The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed. Business Ethics Quarterly 8(1):19–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay D., McCourt Larres P., Oyelere P., Fisher A. (2001). The Ethical Perceptions of Undergraduate Students in Computer Related Situations: An Analysis of the Effects of Culture, Gender and Prior Education. Teaching Business Ethics 5(3):331–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoberman, B.: 1985, February, ‚Translating the Bible’, The Atlantic Monthly, pp. 43–58

  • Holsti O. R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt S., Vasquez-Parraga A. Z. (1993). Organizational Consequences, Marketing Ethics, and Salesforce Supervision. Journal of Marketing Research 30(1):78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives B., Jarvenpaa S. L. (1996). Will the Internet Revolutionize Business Education and Research? Sloan Management Review 37(3):33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings M. (2004). Incorporating Ethics and Professionalism into Accounting Education and Research: A Discussion of the Voids and Advocacy for Training in Seminal Works in Business Ethics. Issues in Accounting Education 19(1):7–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (1959). Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Bobbs-Merrill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassarjian H. (1977). Content Analysis in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research 4(1):8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kienzler D. S. (2004). Teaching Ethics isn’t Enough: The Challenge of Being Ethical Teachers. The Journal of Business Communication 41(3):292–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe R. H., Burnett M. S. (1991). Content-Analysis Research: An Examination of Applications with Directives for Improving Research Reliability and Objectivity. Journal of Consumer Research 18(2):243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labeff E. E., Clark R. E., Haines V. J., Diekhoff G. M. (1990). Situational Ethics and College Student Cheating. Sociological Inquiry 60(2):190–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak G. R., Murphy P. E. (1991). Fostering Ethical Marketing Decisions. The Journal of Business Ethics 10(4):259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson R. A. (2004). Is Classroom Cheating Related to Business Students’ Propensity to Cheat in the “Real World”? Journal of Business Ethics 49(2):189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis P. V., Speck III H. E. (1990). Ethical Orientations for Understanding Business Ethics. The Journal of Business Communication 27(3):213–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loe T. L., Ferrell L., Mansfield P. (2000). A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision-Making in Business. Journal of Business Ethics 25(3):185–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthar H. K., Karri R. (2005). Exposure to Ethics Education and the Perception of Linkage between Organizational Ethical Behavior and Business Outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics 61(4):353–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallinger M. (1997). Decisive Decision-Making: An Exercise Using Ethical Frameworks. Journal of Management Education 21(3):411–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallon T. (1989). Stolen Words: Forays into the Origins and Ravages of Plagiarism. Ticknor & Fields, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, R.: 2004, January, Music Downloading Demand Dramatically Declines. Retrieved September 9, 2004 from http://www.clickz.com/stats/big_picture/applications/print.php/1301_3295201

  • Mason J. B. (1991). Improving Marketing Education in the 1990s: A Dean’s Perspective. Marketing Education Review 1(1):10–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathison D. L. (1988). Business Ethics Cases and Decision Models: A Call for Relevancy in the Classroom. Journal of Business Ethics 7(2):777–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe D. L. (1992). The Influence of Situational Ethics on Cheating among College Students. Sociological Inquiry 62(3):365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J.: 1998 ‚The New Plagiarism: Seven Antidotes to Prevent Highway Robbery in an Electronic Age. From Now On’, The Educational Technology Journal, 7(8). Retrieved July 31, 2004 from http://www.fno.org/index.html

  • McLafferty C. L., Foust K. M. (2004). Electronic Plagiarism as a College Instructor’s Nightmare – Prevention and Detection. Journal of Education for Business 79(3):186–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Mengue B. (1998). Organizational Consequences, Marketing Ethics, and Salesforce Supervision: Further Empirical Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics 17(4):333–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill J. S. (1861/1957). Utilitarianism. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell D., Herzog H. A. Jr. (1996). Ethical Ideology and Moral Persuasion: Personal Moral Philosophy, Gender and Judgments of Pro-and Anti-Animal Research Propaganda. Society and Animals 4(1):53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett D. L., Conceicao-Runlee S. (2000). Designing a Faculty Development Program on Technology: If You Build It Will They Come? Journal of Social Work Education 36(2):325–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, E.: 2000, ‚Plagiarism at Oxy’, The Occidental. Retrieved August 1, 2002 from http://www.oxy.edu/∼thepaper/archive/issue000128/stories/news1.htm

  • Plagiarism and the Internet: 2004, Turnitin, Research Resources. Retrieved July 16, 2004 from http://www.turnitin.com/research_site/e_what_is_plagiarism.html

  • Plutsky S., Wilson B. A. (2001). Writing Across the Curriculum: College of Business and Economics. Business Communication Quarterly 64(4):26–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt C. B. (1993). Critique of the Classical Theory of Situational Ethics in U.S. Public Relations. Public Relations Review 19(3):219–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preventing Plagiarism: Resources for Educators: 2004, Turnitin, Research Resources. Retrieved July 16, 2004 from http://www.turnitin.com/research_site/e_preventing_p.html

  • Rand A. (1964). The Virtue of Selfishness: A New Concept of Egoism. New American Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall M. (2001). Pragmatic Plagiarism: Authorship, Profit, and Power. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas M. Y., Isakson H. R. (2000). Ethics of Tomorrow’s Business Managers: The Influence of Personal Beliefs and Values, Individual Characteristics and Situational Factors. Journal of Education for Business 75(6):321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimer, S.: 2003, September 3, ‚A Campus Fad that’s Being Copied: Internet Plagiarism Seems on the Rise’, The New York Times, p. B7

  • Robertson C., Fadill P. (1999). Ethical Decision-Making in Multinational Organizations: A Culture-Based Model. Journal of Business Ethics 19(4):385–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roig, M.: 2001, ‚Plagiarism and Paraphrasing Criteria of College and University Professors’, Ethics and Behavior 11(3), 307–323. Retrieved May 20, 2002 from PsycINFO database

  • Ryan, J. J. C. H.: 1998, December, ‚Student Plagiarism in an Online World’, ASEE Prism Magazine, pp. 1–5. Retrieved July 31, 2004 from http://www.asee.org/prism/december/html/student_plagiarism_in_an_onlin.htm

  • Sims R. L. (1993). The Relationship between Academic Dishonesty and Unethical Business Practices. Journal of Education for Business 68(4):207–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith K. J., Davy A., Rosenberg D. L., Haight G. T. (2002). A Structural Modeling Investigation of the Influence of Demographics and Attitudinal Factors and In-class Deterrents on Cheating Behavior among Accounting Majors. Journal of Accounting Education 20(1):45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth M. L., Davis J. R. (2004). Perceptions of Dishonesty among Two-year College Students: Academic versus Business Situations. Journal of Business Ethics 51(1):63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolik, M.: 2000, ‚Designing Writing Assignments’, Writing Across Berkeley, 1(2), 1–2. Retrieved July 20, 2004 from http://www.writing.berkeley.edu/wab/1-2-before.htm

  • Stevens B. (1996). Using the Competing Framework to Assess Corporate Ethical Codes. The Journal of Business Communication 33(1):71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinyard W. R., DeLong T. J., Cheng P. S. (1989). The Relationship between Moral Decisions and Their Consequences: A Tradeoff Analysis Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 8(4):289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes G. M., Matza D. (1957).Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency. American Sociological Review 22(6):664–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Patent Office: 2004, (n. d.). Intellectual Property: A History of Copyright. Retrieved July 20, 2004 from http://www.intellectual-property.gov.uk/std/resources/copyright/history.htm

  • Vitell S., Grove S. (1987). Marketing Ethics and Techniques of Neutralization. Journal of Business Ethics 6(6):433–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell S., Nwachukwa S., Barnes J. (1993). The Effects of Culture on Ethical Decision-Making: An Application of Hofstede’s Typology. Journal of Business Ethics 12(10):753–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster R. L., Harmon H. (2002). Comparing Levels of Machiavellianism of Today’s College Students with College Students of the 1960s. Teaching Business Ethics 6(4):435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West T., Ravenscroft S., Schrader C. (2004). Cheating and Moral Judgment in the College Classroom: A Natural Experiment. Journal of Business Ethics 54(2):173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zack, I.: 1998, September 16, ‚The Latest Academic Vice: Computer-Assisted Cheating’, The New York Times online. Retrieved July 20, 2004 from Lexis-Nexis database

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Marketing and Business Communication, Cal State Fullerton, College Park 900, 800 North State College Boulevard, Fullerton, CA, 92834-6848, USA

    Neil Granitz & Dana Loewy

Authors
  1. Neil Granitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dana Loewy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dana Loewy.

Additional information

This research is the result of a long-standing interest in new technology and plagiarism. Very early ideas on this subject were presented by the authors at the ABC West Conference in New Orleans in March 2003. Dr. Neil Granitz teaches Marketing at Cal State Fullerton. He has published articles in the Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Marketing Education, and the Quarterly Journal of E-Commerce. Moreover, Neil is a consultant for the fast-food industry, the airline industry, and an Internet advertising agency. Before earning his MBA at McGill University in Montreal and a Ph.D. in Marketing at Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona, Neil Granitz gained extensive corporate experience in market and consumer research. Neil’s research focuses on three areas: (1) Instilling meaning and motivation into marketing education, (2) E-Commerce: Development and effect on marketing educators and practitioners, and (3) Awareness of ethics: Its influence on the internal culture of organization. Dr. Dana Loewy teaches Business Communication at Cal State Fullerton. Having earned a Ph.D. from the University of Southern California in English and translation, she is a well-published freelance translator, interpreter, and brand-name consultant. Fluent in several languages, among them German and Czech, Dana has published critical articles in many areas of interest and various poetry as well as prose translations, most notably the 1997 volume The Early Poetry of Jaroslav Seifert from Northwestern University Press.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Granitz, N., Loewy, D. Applying Ethical Theories: Interpreting and Responding to Student Plagiarism. J Bus Ethics 72, 293–306 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9171-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9171-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation