Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Spark-based multi-verse optimizer as wrapper features selection algorithm for phishing attack challenge

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, phishing attacks have grown rapidly, and there is an urgent need to introduce a suitable detection method that has the ability to detect different types of phishing attacks. This paper investigates the capability to use bio-inspired meta-heuristic algorithms to improve the performance of the detection engine for phishing attacks by reducing the number of features. This improvement was practiced by investigating the effectiveness of five meta-heuristic algorithms: Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Firefly Optimization Algorithm (FFA), Multi-Verse Optimizer (MVO), Moth-Flame Optimization algorithm (MFO), and BAT optimization algorithm, to select the relevant features that could be affected directly by different types of phishing attacks. The suggested detection model was tested and evaluated using four benchmark phishing attack datasets, and the Apache Spark-based decision tree algorithm was selected as a detection engine. The conducted experiments have demonstrated that the Spark-based MVO algorithm achieved the highest detection rate for detecting different types of phishing attacks within four phishing attack datasets. Moreover, the suggested detection model was able to reduce effectively the feature space, which could enhance the computational efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Manuscript has no associated data.

References

  1. Abass, I.A.M., et al.: Social engineering threat and defense: a literature survey. J. Inf. Secur. 9(04), 257 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Salahdine, F., Kaabouch, N.: Social engineering attacks: a survey. Future Internet 11(4), 89 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sadiq, A., Anwar, M., Butt, R.A., Masud, F., Shahzad, M.K., Naseem, S., Younas, M.: A review of phishing attacks and countermeasures for internet of things-based smart business applications in industry 4.0. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 3(5), 854–864 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Basit, A., Zafar, M., Liu, X., Javed, A.R., Jalil, Z., Kifayat, K.: A comprehensive survey of ai-enabled phishing attacks detection techniques. Telecommun. Syst. 76(1), 139–154 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oest, A., Zhang, P., Wardman, B., Nunes, E., Burgis, J., Zand, A., Thomas, K., DoupÃÂ, A., Ahn, G.J.: Sunrise to sunset: analyzing the end-to-end life cycle and effectiveness of phishing attacks at scale. In: 29th \(\{\)USENIX\(\}\) Security Symposium (\(\{\)USENIX\(\}\) Security 20) (2020)

  6. Penmatsa, R.K.V., Kakarlapudi, P.: Web phishing detection: feature selection using rough sets and ant colony optimisation. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Design Comput. 2(2), 102–113 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tang, L., Mahmoud, Q.H.: A survey of machine learning-based solutions for phishing website detection. Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 3(3), 672–694 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta, B.B., Tewari, A., Jain, A.K., Agrawal, D.P.: Fighting against phishing attacks: state of the art and future challenges. Neural Comput. Appl. 28(12), 3629–3654 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alanezi, M.: Phishing detection methods: a review. (2021)

  10. Gutierrez, C.N., Kim, T., Della Corte, R., Avery, J., Goldwasser, D., Cinque, M., Bagchi, S.: Learning from the ones that got away: detecting new forms of phishing attacks. IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput. 15(6), 988–1001 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Drury, V., Lux, L., Meyer, U.: Dating phish: an analysis of the life cycles of phishing attacks and campaigns. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, pp. 1–11 (2022)

  12. Almseidin, M., Alzubi, M., Alkasassbeh, M., Kovacs, S.: Applying intrusion detection algorithms on the KDD-99 dataset. Prod. Syst. Inf. Eng. 8, 51–67 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Almseidin, M., Al-Sawwa, J.,Alkasassbeh, M.: Anomaly-based intrusion detection system using fuzzy logic. In: 2021 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT), pp. 290–295. IEEE (2021)

  14. Almseidin, M., Al-Sawwa, J., Alkasassbeh, M.: Generating a benchmark cyber multi-step attacks dataset for intrusion detection. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 43(3), 3679–3694 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Devika, G., Karegowda, A.G.: Bio-inspired optimization: Algorithm, analysis and scope of application. In Swarm Intelligence-Recent Advances and Current Applications. IntechOpen (2023)

  16. Darvishpoor, S., Darvishpour, A., Escarcega, M., Hassanalian, M.: Nature-inspired algorithms from oceans to space: a comprehensive review of heuristic and meta-heuristic optimization algorithms and their potential applications in drones. Drones 7(7), 427 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, X.-S.: Nature-inspired optimization algorithms: challenges and open problems. J. Comput. Sci. 46, 101104 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN’95-international conference on neural networks, vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)

  19. Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S.M., Hatamlou, A.: Multi-verse optimizer: a nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization. Neural Comput. Appl. 27, 495–513 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mirjalili, S., Lewis, A.: The whale optimization algorithm. Adv. Eng. Softw. 95, 51–67 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alsariera, Y.A., Balogun, A.O., Adeyemo, V.E., Tarawneh, O.H., Mojeed, H.A.: Intelligent tree-based ensemble approaches for phishing website detection. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 17, 563–582 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aljofey, A., Jiang, Q., Rasool, A., Chen, H., Liu, W., Qiang, Q., Wang, Y.: An effective detection approach for phishing websites using URL and HTML features. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 1–19 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalabarige, L.R., Rao, R.S., Abraham, A., Gabralla, L.A.: Multilayer stacked ensemble learning model to detect phishing websites. IEEE Access 10, 79543–79552 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Barraclough, P.A., Fehringer, G., Woodward, J.: Intelligent cyber-phishing detection for online. Comput. Secur. 104, 102123 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sabahno, M., Safara, F.: ISHO: improved spotted hyena optimization algorithm for phishing website detection. Multimedia Tools Appl. 81(24), 34677–34696 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Odeh, A., Keshta, I., Abdelfattah, E.: Phiboost-a novel phishing detection model using adaptive boosting approach. Jordan. J. Comput. Inf. Technol. 7(01), 1 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Adeyemo, V.E., Balogun, A.O., Mojeed, H.A., Akande, N.O., Adewole, K.S.: Ensemble-based logistic model trees for website phishing detection. In: International Conference on Advances in Cyber Security, pp. 627–641. Springer (2021)

  28. Lakshmi, L., Purushotham Reddy, M., Santhaiah, C., Janardhan Reddy, U.: Smart phishing detection in web pages using supervised deep learning classification and optimization technique ADAM. Wirel. Person. Commun. 118(4), 3549–3564 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sagnik Anupam and Arpan Kumar Kar: Phishing website detection using support vector machines and nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Telecommun. Syst. 76(1), 17–32 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gandotra, E., Gupta, D.: Improving spoofed website detection using machine learning. Cybern. Syst. 52(2), 169–190 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lakshmanarao, A., Rao, P.S.P., Krishna, M.B.: Phishing website detection using novel machine learning fusion approach. In: 2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Systems (ICAIS), pp. 1164–1169. IEEE (2021)

  32. Lakshmi, L., Reddy, M.P., Santhaiah, C., Reddy, U.J.: Smart phishing detection in web pages using supervised deep learning classification and optimization technique adam. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 118(4), 3549–3564 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Alsariera, Y.A., Adeyemo, V.E., Balogun, A.O., Alazzawi, A.K.: Ai meta-learners and extra-trees algorithm for the detection of phishing websites. IEEE Access 8, 142532–142542 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zamir, A., Khan, H.U., Iqbal, T., Yousaf, N., Aslam, F., Anjum, A., Hamdani, M.: Phishing web site detection using diverse machine learning algorithms. Electr. Libr. 38(1), 65–80 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yazan Ahmad Alsariera, Victor Elijah Adeyemo, Abdullateef Oluwagbemiga Balogun, and Ammar Kareem Alazzawi. Ai meta-learners and extra-trees algorithm for the detection of phishing websites. IEEE Access, 8:142532–142542, 2020

  36. Mohammad, R.M., Thabtah, F., McCluskey, L.: An assessment of features related to phishing websites using an automated technique. In: 2012 international conference for internet technology and secured transactions, pp. 492–497. IEEE (2012)

  37. Yang, P., Zhao, G., Zeng, P.: Phishing website detection based on multidimensional features driven by deep learning. IEEE Access 7, 15196–15209 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ali, W., Ahmed, A.A.: Hybrid intelligent phishing website prediction using deep neural networks with genetic algorithm-based feature selection and weighting. IET Inf. Secur. 13(6), 659–669 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chiew, K.L., Tan, C.L., Wong, K., Yong, K.S.C., Tiong, W.K.: A new hybrid ensemble feature selection framework for machine learning-based phishing detection system. Inf. Sci. 484, 153–166 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jain, A.K., Gupta, B.B.: Towards detection of phishing websites on client-side using machine learning based approach. Telecommun. Syst. 68(4), 687–700 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, X.-S.: Firefly algorithms for multimodal optimization. In Stochastic Algorithms: Foundations and Applications: 5th International Symposium, SAGA 2009, Sapporo, Japan, October 26–28, 2009. Proceedings 5, pp. 169–178. Springer (2009)

  42. Kaveh, A., Talatahari, S.: A novel heuristic optimization method: charged system search. Acta Mech. 213(3–4), 267–289 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mirjalili, S.: Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl.-Based Syst. 89, 228–249 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Alweshah, M., Hammouri, A., Alkhalaileh, S., Alzubi, O.: Intrusion detection for the internet of things (IoT) based on the emperor penguin colony optimization algorithm. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. 14, 1–18 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Almseidin, M., Al-Sawwa, J., Alkasassbeh, M.: Generating a benchmark cyber multi-step attacks dataset for intrusion detection. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 43, 1–15 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gupta, B., Rawat, A., Jain, A., Arora, A., Dhami, N.: Analysis of various decision tree algorithms for classification in data mining. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 163(8), 15–19 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tan, C.L.: Phishing dataset for machine learning: feature evaluation. Mendeley Data 1, 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mamun, M.S.I., Rathore, M.A., Lashkari, A.H., Stakhanova, N., Ghorbani, A.A.: Detecting malicious urls using lexical analysis. In Network and System Security: 10th International Conference, NSS 2016, Taipei, Taiwan, September 28–30, 2016, Proceedings 10, pp. 467–482. Springer (2016)

  49. Vrbani, G., Fister, I., Podgorelec, V.: Datasets for phishing websites detection. Data Brief 33, 106438 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jamil Al-Sawwa, Mohammad Almseidin, Mouhammd Alkasassbeh, Khalid Alemerien and Remah Younisse have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Department, Tafila Technical University, Tafila, Jordan

    Jamil Al-Sawwa & Mohammad Almseidin

  2. Computer Science Department, Princess Summaya University for Technology, Amman, Jordan

    Mouhammd Alkasassbeh & Remah Younisse

  3. IT Department, Tafila Technical University, Tafila, Jordan

    Khalid Alemerien

Authors
  1. Jamil Al-Sawwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad Almseidin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mouhammd Alkasassbeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Khalid Alemerien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Remah Younisse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors have contributed equally to the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Almseidin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Sawwa, J., Almseidin, M., Alkasassbeh, M. et al. Spark-based multi-verse optimizer as wrapper features selection algorithm for phishing attack challenge. Cluster Comput 27, 5799–5814 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-024-04272-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-024-04272-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation