Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Convergence rate estimates for penalty methods revisited

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the classical quadratic penalty, it is known that the distance from the solution of the penalty subproblem to the solution of the original problem is at worst inversely proportional to the value of the penalty parameter under the linear independence constraint qualification, strict complementarity, and the second-order sufficient optimality conditions. Moreover, using solutions of the penalty subproblem, one can obtain certain useful Lagrange multipliers estimates whose distance to the optimal ones is also at least inversely proportional to the value of the parameter. We show that the same properties hold more generally, namely, under the (weaker) strict Mangasarian–Fromovitz constraint qualification and second-order sufficiency (and without strict complementarity). Moreover, under the linear independence constraint qualification and strong second-order sufficiency (also without strict complementarity), we demonstrate local uniqueness and Lipschitz continuity of stationary points of penalty subproblems. In addition, those results follow from the analysis of general power penalty functions, of which quadratic penalty is a special case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availibility Statement

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no data sets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Avakov, E.R., Arutyunov, A.V., Izmailov, A.F.: On convergence rate estimates for power penalty methods. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 44, 1684–1695 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertsekas, D.P.: On penalty and multiplier methods for constrained minimization. SIAM J. Control. Optim. 14, 216–235 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertsekas, D.P.: Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods. Academic Press, New York (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Birgin, E.G., Martínez, J.M.: Practical Augmented Lagrangian Methods for Constrained Optimization. Fundamentals of Algorithms, vol. 10. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA (2014)

  5. Bonnans, J.F., Shapiro, A.: Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problems. Springer, New York (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonnans, J.F., Sulem, A.: Pseudopower expansion of solutions of generalized equations and constrained optimization. Math. Program. 70, 123–148 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Burke, J.V.: An exact penalization viewpoint of constrained optimization. SIAM J. Control. Optim. 29, 968–998 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Conn, A.R., Gould, N.I.M., Toint, Ph.L.: Trust-Region Methods. SIAM, Philadelphia (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Courant, R.: Variational methods for the solution of problems of equilibrium and vibration. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 49, 1–23 (1943)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernández, D., Solodov, M.V.: Local convergence of exact and inexact augmented Lagrangian methods under the second-order sufficient optimality condition. SIAM J. Optim. 22, 384–407 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fiacco, A.V., McCormick, G.: Nonlinear Programming: Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques. Wiley, New York (1968)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Fletcher, R.: Practical Methods of Optimization, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Gauvin, J.: A necessary and sufficient regularity conditions to have bounded multipliers in nonconvex programming. Math. Program. 12, 136–138 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Izmailov, A.F., Solodov, M.V.: Error bounds for 2-regular mappings with Lipschitzian derivatives and their applications. Math. Program. 89, 413–435 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Izmailov, A.F., Solodov, M.V.: Numerical Methods for Optimization. Fizmatlit, Moscow (2003). (In Russain)

  16. Izmailov, A.F., Solodov, M.V.: Newton-type Methods for Optimization and Variational Problems. Springer, Cham (2014)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo, Z.-Q., Pang, J.-S., Ralph, D.: Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo, Z.-Q., Pang, J.-S., Ralph, D., Wu, S.-Q.: Exact penalization and stationarity conditions of mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Math. Program. 75, 19–76 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Mangasarian, O.L.: Sufficiency of exact penalty minimization. SIAM J. Control. Optim. 23, 30–37 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Nocedal, J., Wright, S.J.: Numerical Optimization, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Polyak, B.T.: Introduction to Optimization. Optimization Software Inc., Publications Division, New York (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Polyak, B.T., Tret’yakov, N.V.: The method of penalty estimates for conditional extremum problems. USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 13, 42–58 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson, S.M.: Strongly regular generalized equations. Math. Oper. Res. 5, 43–62 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Robinson, S.M.: Generalized equations and their solutions, Part II: applications to nonlinear programming. Math. Program. Study 10, 200–221 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruszczynski, A.: Nonlinear Optimization. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2006)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the three referees for very helpful comments and suggestions that led us to re-organize and improve the original version of the paper. Research of the second author was supported in part by CNPq Grant 303913/2019-3, by FAPERJ Grant E-26/200.347/2023, and by PRONEX–Optimization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. V. Solodov.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest of any kind.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Izmailov, A.F., Solodov, M.V. Convergence rate estimates for penalty methods revisited. Comput Optim Appl 85, 973–992 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-023-00476-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-023-00476-1

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification