Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Evaluation of ordinal attributes at value level

  • Published:
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a novel context sensitive algorithm for evaluation of ordinal attributes which exploits the information hidden in ordering of attributes’ and class’ values and provides a separate score for each value of the attribute. Similar to feature selection algorithm ReliefF, the proposed algorithm exploits the contextual information via selection of nearest instances. The ordEval algorithm outputs probabilistic factors corresponding to the effect an increase/decrease of attribute’s value has on the class value. While the ordEval algorithm is general and can be used for analysis of any survey with graded answers, we show its utility on an important marketing problem of customer (dis)satisfaction. We develop a visualization technique and show how we can use it to detect and confirm several findings from marketing theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Anderson EW (1994) Cross-category variation in customer satisfaction and retention. Mark Lett 5(January):19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson EW, Sullivan M (1993) The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Science 12(2): 125–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson EW, Fornell C, Lehmann D (1994) Customer satisfaction, market share and profitability: Findings from Sweden. J Marketing 58(July):63–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RE (1973) Consumer dissatisfaction: the effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance. J Mark Res 10(February):38–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth Inc, Belmont, CA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cardozo RN (1965) An experimental study of customer effort, expectations, and satisfaction. J Mark Res 2(August):244–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill GAJ, Surprenant C (1982) An investigation into the determinants of consumer satisfaction. J Mark Res 19:491–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2001) Pattern classification, 2nd edition. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn HJ, Hogarth RM (1981) Behavioral decision theory: processes of judgement and choice. Annu Rev Psychol 32:53–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong SJ (1997) Use of contextual information for feature ranking and discretization. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng 9(5):718–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kononenko I (1994) Estimating attributes: analysis and extensions of Relief. In: De Raedt L, Bergadano F (eds) Machine learning: ECML-94. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 171–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononenko I (1995) On biases in estimating multi-valued attributes. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’95), Morgan Kaufmann, pp 1034–1040

  • Mittal V, Kamakura W (2001) Satisfaction, repurchase intention, and repurchase behavior: investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics. J Marketing Res 38(February):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal V, Ross WJ, Baldasare P (1998) The asymmetric impact of negative and positive attribute-level performance on overall satisfaction and repurchase intentions. J Marketing 62(January):33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL (1993) Cognitive, affective and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. J Consumer Res 20:418–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver RL (1997) Satisfaction: a behavioral perspective on the consumer. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters G, Czapinski J (1990) Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: the distinction between affective and informational negativity effect. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 1:33–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan JR (1993) C4.5: programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Robnik-Šikonja M, Kononenko I (2003) Theoretical and empirical analysis of ReliefF and RReliefF. Mach Learning J 53:23–69

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi V, King R (1999) Nonlinear and noncompensatory models in user information satisfaction measurement. Inform Syst Res 10(1): 87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreng RA, McKensey S, Olshavsky R (1996) A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. J Marketing 60(July):15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski DM, Henard D (2001) Consumer satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. J Acad Marketing Sci 29(1):16–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse DK, Wilton P (1988) Models of consumer satisfaction formation: an extension. J Marketing Res 25(May):204–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi Y (1991) A critical review of consumer satisfaction. In Zeithaml VA (ed) Review of marketing. American Marketing Association, Chicago, pp 68–123

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marko Robnik-Šikonja.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Charu Aggarwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robnik-Šikonja, M., Vanhoof, K. Evaluation of ordinal attributes at value level. Data Min Knowl Disc 14, 225–243 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-006-0048-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-006-0048-4

Keywords