Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Do your friends make you buy this brand?

Modeling social recommendation with topics and brands

  • Published:
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumer behavior and marketing research have shown that brand has significant influence on product reviews and product purchase decisions. However, there is very little work on incorporating brand related factors into product recommender systems. Meanwhile, the similarity in brand preference between a user and other socially connected users also affects her adoption decisions. To integrate seamlessly the individual and social brand related factors into the recommendation process, we propose a novel model called Social Brand–Item–Topic (SocBIT). As the original SocBIT model does not enforce non-negativity, which poses some difficulty in result interpretation, we also propose a non-negative version, called SocBIT \(\varvec{^+}\). Both SocBIT and \(\hbox {SocBIT}^+\) return not only user topic interest, but also brand-related user factors, namely user brand preference and user brand-consciousness. The former refers to user preference for each brand, the latter refers to the extent to which a user relies on brand to make her adoption decisions. Our experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that SocBIT and \(\hbox {SocBIT}^+\) significantly improve rating prediction accuracy over state-of-the-art models such as Social Regularization Ma et al. (in: ACM conference on web search and data mining (WSDM), 2011), Recommendation by Social Trust Ensemble Ma et al. (in: ACM conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR), 2009a) and Social Recommendation Ma et al. (in: ACM conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM), 2008), which incorporate only the social factors. Specifically, both SocBIT and \(\hbox {SocBIT}^+\) offer an improvement of at least 22% over these state-of-the-art models in rating prediction for various real-world datasets. Last but not least, our models also outperform the mentioned models in adoption prediction, e.g., they provide higher precision-at-N and recall-at-N.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. https://www.ama.org/resources/Pages/Dictionary.aspx?dLetter=B.

References

  • Ambler T (1997) Do brands benefit consumers? Int J Advert 16(3):167–198

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Baltrunas L, Ludwig B, Ricci F (2011) Matrix factorization techniques for context aware recommendation. In: ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys), pp 301–304

  • Bedi P, Kaur H, Marwaha S (2007) Trust based recommender system for semantic web. Int Joint Conf Artif Intell (IJCAI) 7:2677–2682

    Google Scholar 

  • Belén del Río A, Vazquez R, Iglesias V (2001) The effects of brand associations on consumer response. J Consum Mark 18(5):410–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer MB (1991) The social self: on being the same and different at the same time. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 17(5):475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall D, Cosley D, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Suri S (2008) Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. In: ACM conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (SIGKDD), pp 160–168

  • Cremonesi P, Turrin R, Lentini E, Matteucci M (2008) An evaluation methodology for collaborative recommender systems. In: Automated solutions for cross media content and multi-channel distribution, pp 224–231

  • Ding CHQ, He X, Simon HD (2005) On the equivalence of nonnegative matrix factorization and spectral clustering. In: SIAM international conference on data mining (SDM), pp 606–610

  • Ding C, Li T, Peng W (2006a) Nonnegative matrix factorization and probabilistic latent semantic indexing: equivalence chi-square statistic, and a hybrid method. In: AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI)

  • Ding C, Li T, Peng W, Park H (2006b) Orthogonal nonnegative matrix t-factorizations for clustering. In: ACM conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (SIGKDD), pp 126–135

  • Erdem T, Keane MP (1996) Decision-making under uncertainty: capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Mark Sci 15(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem T, Swait J, Broniarczyk S, Chakravarti D, Kapferer J-N, Keane M, Roberts J, Steenkamp JBEM, Zettelmeyer F (1999) Brand equity, consumer learning and choice. Mark Lett 10(3):301–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem T, Zhao Y, Valenzuela A (2004) Performance of store brands: a cross-country analysis of consumer store-brand preferences, perceptions, and risk. J Mark Res 41(1):86–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin NE (2006) A structural theory of social influence, vol 13. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeff TR (1996) Using promotional messages to manage the effects of brand and self-image on brand evaluations. J Consum Mark 13(3):4–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann T (2003) Collaborative filtering via Gaussian probabilistic latent semantic analysis. In: ACM conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR)

  • Hofmann T (2004) Latent semantic models for collaborative filtering. ACM Trans Inf Syst (TOIS) 22(1):89–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg MK, Cox AJ, Keeling K (2000) The impact of self-monitoring on image congruence and product/brand evaluation. Eur J Mark 34(5/6):641–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer PO (2002) Non-negative sparse coding. In: Neural networks for signal processing, pp 557–565

  • Hoyer PO (2004) Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints. J Mach Learn Res (JMLR) 5:1457–1469

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali M (2010) Flixster dataset. http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~jamalim/datasets/

  • Jamali M, Ester M (2010) A matrix factorization technique with trust propagation for recommendation in social networks. In: ACM Conference on recommender systems (RecSys), pp 135–142

  • Jiang M, Cui P, Liu R, Yang Q, Wang F, Zhu W, Yang S (2012) Social contextual recommendation. In: ACM conference on information and knowledge management, pp 45–54

  • Koren Y (2008) Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In: ACM conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (SIGKDD), pp 426–434

  • Koren Y, Bell R, Volinsky C (2009) Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42(8):30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DD, Seung HS (1999) Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401(6755):788–791

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DD, Seung HS (2001) Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. In: Conference on neural information processing systems (NIPS)

  • Lin C-J (2007) Projected gradient methods for nonnegative matrix factorization. Neural Comput 19(10):2756–2779

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Wang F, Zheng Q (2015) Modeling users’ adoption behaviors with social selection and influence. In: Proceedings of the 2015 SIAM international conference on data mining, pp 253–261

  • Long MM, Schiffman LG (2000) Consumption values and relationships: segmenting the market for frequency programs. J Consum Mark 17(3):214–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma H, Yang H, Lyu MR, King I (2008) Sorec: social recommendation using probabilistic matrix factorization. In: ACM conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM), pp 931–940

  • Ma H, King I, Lyu MR (2009a) Learning to recommend with social trust ensemble. In: ACM conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR), pp 203–210

  • Ma H, Lyu MR, King I (2009b) Learning to recommend with trust and distrust relationships. In: ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys), pp 189–196

  • Ma H, King I, Lyu MR (2011a) Learning to recommend with explicit and implicit social relations. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol (TIST) 2(3):29

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma H, Zhou D, Liu C, Lyu MR, King I (2011b) Recommender systems with social regularization. In: ACM conference on web search and data mining (WSDM), pp 287–296

  • Ma H, Zhou TC, Lyu MR, King I (2011c) Improving recommender systems by incorporating social contextual information. ACM Trans Inf Syst (TOIS) 29(2):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massa P, Avesani P (2007) Trust-aware recommender systems. In: ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys), pp 17–24

  • McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann Rev Soc 27:415–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mnih A, Salakhutdinov R (2007) Probabilistic matrix factorization. In: Conference on neural information processing systems (NIPS), pp 1257–1264

  • Paatero P, Tapper U (1994) Positive matrix factorization: a non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values. Environmetrics 5(2):111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilászy I, Zibriczky D, Tikk D (2010) Fast als-based matrix factorization for explicit and implicit feedback datasets. In: ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys), pp 71–78

  • Rennie JDM, Srebro N (2005) Fast maximum margin matrix factorization for collaborative prediction. In: International conference on machine learning (ICML), pp 713–719

  • Salakhutdinov R, Mnih A (2008) Bayesian probabilistic matrix factorization using markov chain Monte Carlo. In: International conference on machine learning (ICML), pp 880–887

  • Shahnaz F, Berry MW, Pauca VP, Plemmons RJ (2006) Document clustering using nonnegative matrix factorization. Inf Process Manag 42(2):373–386

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon MR (1999) The value of status and the status of value. In: Holbrook MB (ed) Consumer value: a framework for analysis and research. Routledge, London, p 63–84

  • Srebro N, Rennie J, Jaakkola TS (2004) Maximum-margin matrix factorization. In: Conference on neural information processing systems (NIPS), pp 1329–1336

  • Su DL, Cui ZM, Wu J, Zhao PP (2013) Pre-filling collaborative filtering algorithm based on matrix factorization. Trans Tech Publ 411:2223–2228

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang J, Gao H, Liu H (2012) mTrust: discerning multi-faceted trust in a connected world. In: ACM conference on web search and data mining (WSDM), pp 93–102

  • Tang J, Hu X, Gao H, Liu H (2013) Exploiting local and global social context for recommendation. In: International joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI), pp 264–269

  • Tang J, Xia H, Liu H (2013) Social recommendation: a review. Soc Netw Anal Min 3(4):1113-1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ubilava D, Foster KA, Lusk JL, Nilsson T (2011) Differences in consumer preferences when facing branded versus non-branded choices. J Consum Behav 10(2):61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigneron F, Johnson LW (1999) A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior. Acad Mark Sci Rev 1999:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakita Y, Oku K, Huang H-H, Kawagoe K (2015) A fashion-brand recommender system using brand association rules and features. In: IIAI 4th international congress on advanced applied informatics (IIAI-AAI), pp 719–720

  • Weimer M, Karatzoglou A, Le QV, Smola A (2007) Maximum margin matrix factorization for collaborative ranking. In: Conference on neural information processing systems (NIPS), pp 1–8

  • Weimer M, Karatzoglou A, Bruch M (2009) Maximum margin matrix factorization for code recommendation. In: ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys), pp 309–312

  • Xu W, Liu X, Gong Y (2003) Document clustering based on non-negative matrix factorization. In: ACM conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR), pp 267–273

  • Yang CF, Ye M, Zhao J (2005) Document clustering based on nonnegative sparse matrix factorization. In: International conference on natural computation, pp 557–563

  • Zhang Y, Pennacchiotti M (2013) Recommending branded products from social media. In: ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys), pp 77–84

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Ministers Office, Singapore under its International Research Centres in Singapore Funding Initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minh-Duc Luu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Fei Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luu, MD., Lim, EP. Do your friends make you buy this brand?. Data Min Knowl Disc 32, 287–319 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-017-0535-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-017-0535-9

Keywords