Abstract
Academic misconduct is a growing problem in online education. While there are ways to curb academic misconduct in online exams, utilization of technology to proctor online exams in a simple manner in limited-resource settings remain unclear. This study set out to identify a reliable technique for utilizing webcam footage to identify instances of academic dishonesty. Instead of applying component-based feature extraction, this study provides a deep learning-based approach to online exam proctoring that recognizes exam candidates’ behaviors directly from video input. By using an online exam dataset consisting of twenty-four test-takers who replicate real-world actions, experimental results show the efficiency of the approach. The article provides a collection of webcam recordings with annotated actions to evaluate the proposed approach. The findings show that a deep learning model using the Slow Only variation has a true detection rate of 78.9%. The visualization module reduces the amount of time invigilators must spend watching videos to capture academic misbehaviors by offering a comprehensive graphical view with details of a candidate’s actions during an exam. The study’s conclusions will help design an effective and efficient system for online exam proctoring in resource-constrained environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data Availability
The participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly, so due to the sensitive nature of the research supporting data is not available.
References
Al-Faris, M., Chiverton, J., Ndzi, D., & Ahmed, A. I. (2020). A review on computer vision-based methods for Human Action Recognition. Journal of Imaging, 6(6), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging6060046.
Amzalag, M., Shapira, N., & Dolev, N. (2022). Two sides of the coin: lack of academic integrity in exams during the corona pandemic, students’ and lecturers’ perceptions. Journal of Academic Ethics, 20(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09413-5.
Arunnehru, J., Chamundeeswari, G., & Bharathi, S. P. (2018). Human action recognition using 3D convolutional neural networks with 3D motion cuboids in surveillance videos. Procedia Computer Science, 133, 471–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.059.
Asep, H. S. G., & Bandung, Y. (2019). A design of continuous user verification for online exam proctoring on m-learning. 2019 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI47359.2019.8988786.
Atoum, Y., Chen, L., Liu, A. X., Hsu, S. D. H., & Liu, X. (2017). Automated online exam proctoring. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 19(7), 1609–1624. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2017.2656064.
Cote, M., Jean, F., Albu, A. B., & Capson, D. (2016). Video summarization for remote invigilation of online exams. 2016 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV.2016.7477704.
Crnkovic, G. D. (2010). Constructive research and info-computational knowledge generation. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 314, 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15223-8_20.
edX Inc. (2019). Schools and partners | edX. EdX Inc. https://www.edx.org/schools-partners.
Feichtenhofer, C. (2020). X3D: Expanding architectures for efficient video recognition. 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00028.
Feichtenhofer, C., Fan, H., Malik, J., & He, K. (2019). SlowFast networks for video recognition. 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019-Octob, 6201–6210. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2019.00630.
Felsinger, D. N., Halloluwa, T., Fonseka. (2023). C. L. I., & Experiences of conducting online exam proctoring in low-resource settings: A sri lankan case study. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 93(1), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v93i1.5094.
Gamage, K. A. A., de Silva, E. K., & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery and assessment during COVID-19: Safeguarding academic integrity. Education Sciences, 10(11), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110301.
Gu, C., Sun, C., Ross, D. A., Vondrick, C., Pantofaru, C., Li, Y., Vijayanarasimhan, S., Toderici, G., Ricco, S., Sukthankar, R., Schmid, C., & Malik, J. (2017). AVA: A video dataset of spatio-temporally localized atomic visual actions. http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08421.
Hayashi, R., Garcia, M., Maddawin, A., & Hewagamage, K. P. (2020). Online learning in Sri Lanka’s higher education institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic (Vol. 5, Issue 151). https://doi.org/10.22617/BRF200260-2.
Howard, A. G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., & Adam, H. (2017). MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04861.
Idemudia, S., Rohani, M. F., Bin, Siraj, M., & Othman, S. H. (2016). A smart approach of E-Exam assessment method using face recognition to address identity theft and cheating. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), 14(10), 515–522. https://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/.
Kaddoura, S., & Gumaei, A. (2022). Towards effective and efficient online exam systems using deep learning-based cheating detection approach. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 16, 200153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200153.
Kasen, J. (2020). How to cheat in online exams: proctored exam, tests or quiz. https://gradebees.com/cheat-online-tests/.
Khlifi, Y., & El-Sabagh, H. A. (2017). A novel authentication scheme for e-assessments based on student behavior over e-learning platform. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 12(04), 62–89. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i04.6478.
Labayen, M., Vea, R., Florez, J., Aginako, N., & Sierra, B. (2021). Online student authentication and proctoring system based on multimodal biometrics technology. Ieee Access : Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 9, 72398–72411. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3079375.
Li, X., Chang, K., Yuan, Y., & Hauptmann, A. (2015). massive open online proctor. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1129–1137. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675245.
Li, H., Xu, M., Wang, Y., Wei, H., & Qu, H. (2021). A visual analytics approach to facilitate the proctoring of online exams. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 17(21), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445294.
Manoharan, S., & Ye, X. (2020). On upholding academic integrity in online examinations. 2020 IEEE Conference on E-Learning, e-Management, and e-Services (IC3e), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3e50159.2020.9288468.
Muzaffar, A. W., Tahir, M., Anwar, M. W., Chaudry, Q., Mir, S. R., & Rasheed, Y. (2021). A systematic review of online exams solutions in e-learning: Techniques, tools, and global adoption. Ieee Access : Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 9, 32689–32712. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3060192.
Nigam, A., Pasricha, R., Singh, T., & Churi, P. (2021). A systematic review on AI-based proctoring systems: Past, present and future. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6421–6445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10597-x.
Proctoring a Live Online Exam with Zoom - NIU - Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning. (n.d.). Retrieved June 5, (2021). from https://www.niu.edu/citl/resources/guides/proctoring-with-zoom.shtml.
Proctoring a Closed-Book Exam in Zoom | Department of Government. (n.d.). Retrieved June 5, (2021). from https://gov.harvard.edu/proctoring-closed-book-exam-zoom.
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017). Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 39(6), 1137–1149. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031.
Siddhpura, A., & Siddhpura, M. (2020). Plagiarism, contract cheating and other academic misconducts in online engineering education: Analysis, detection and prevention strategies. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48869.2020.9368311.
Ullah, A., Muhammad, K., Ding, W., Palade, V., Haq, I. U., & Baik, S. W. (2021). Efficient activity recognition using lightweight CNN and DS-GRU network for surveillance applications. Applied Soft Computing, 103, 107102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107102.
Ye, W., Cheng, J., Yang, F., & Xu, Y. (2019). Two-stream convolutional network for improving activity recognition using convolutional long short-term memory networks. Ieee Access : Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 7, 67772–67780. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.291880.
Yulita, I. N., Hariz, F. A., Suryana, I., & Prabuwono, A. S. (2023). educational innovation faced with COVID-19: Deep learning for online exam cheating detection. Education Sciences, 13(2), 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020194.
Zhu, Y., Li, X., Liu, C., Zolfaghari, M., Xiong, Y., Wu, C., Zhang, Z., Tighe, J., Manmatha, R., & Li, M. (2020). A comprehensive study of deep video action recognition. http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06567.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Felsinger, D., Halloluwa, T. & Fonseka, I. Video based action detection for online exam proctoring in resource-constrained settings. Educ Inf Technol 29, 12077–12091 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12385-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12385-1