Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Enabling assisted strategic negotiations in actual-world procurement scenarios

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the everyday business world, the sourcing process of multiple goods and services usually involves complex negotiations (via telephone, fax, etc.) that include discussion of product and service features. Nowadays, this is a high-cost process due to the scarce use of tools that streamline this negotiation process and assist purchasing managers’ decision-making. With the advent of Internet-based technologies, it has become feasible the idea of tools enabling low-cost, assisted, fluid, on-line dialogs between buyer enterprises and their providers wherever they are located. Consequently, several commercial systems to support on-line negotiations (e-sourcing tools) have been released. It is our view that there is still a need for these systems to incorporate effective decision support. This article presents the foundations of Quotes, a commercial sourcing application developed by iSOCO that, in addition to cover the whole sequence of sourcing tasks, incorporates decision support facilities based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques that successfully address previous limitations within a single and coherent framework. The paper focuses on the computational realization of sourcing tasks along with the decision support facilities they require. While supported negotiation events are Request for Quotations/Proposals (RFQs/RFPs) and reverse auctions, decision support facilities include offer generation, offer comparison, and optimal bid set computation (winner determination) in combinatorial negotiations. Additionally, the paper presents a compound of experiences and lessons learned when using Quotes for real sourcing processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aberdeen Group. (2002). Making e-sourcing strategic: from tactical technology to core business strategy.

  2. Andersson, A., Tenhunen, M., & Ygge, F. (2000). Integer programming for combinatorial auction winner determination. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on multi-agent systems (ICMAS) (pp. 39–46), Boston, MA.

  3. Ariba. http//www.ariba.com

  4. Baas, X., & Kwakernaak, X. (1977). Rating and ranking of multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets. Automatica, 13, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bichler, M., Kalagnanam, J., & Lee, H. S. (2002). RECO: Representation and evaluation of configurable offers. In H. K. Bhargava, N. Ye (Eds.), Computational modeling and problem solving in the networked world: interfaces in computing and optimization. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Collins, J., & Gini, M. (2001). An integer programming formulation of the bid evaluation problem for coordinated tasks. In B. Dietrich, R. V. Vohra (Eds.), IMA volumes in mathematics and its applications: Vol. 127. Mathematics of the Internet: e-auction and markets (pp. 59–74). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Commerce One. http://www.commerceone.com.

  8. De Vries, S., & Vohra, R. (2001). Combinatorial auctions: a survey.

  9. E-negotiation group (2000). The London classification. In DEXA workshop on e-negotiations, London.

  10. Fujishima, Y., Leyton-Brown, K., & Shoham, Y. (1999). Taming the computational complexity of combinatorial auctions: Optimal and approximate approaches. In Proceedings of the sixteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI’99 (pp. 548–553).

  11. Godo, L., & López de Mántaras, R. (1993). Fuzzy logic. In Encyclopedia of computer science and technology (Vol. 29, pp. 211–229). Pennsylvania: Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holte, R. C. (2001). Lecture notes in computer science : Vol. 2056. Combinatorial auctions, knapsack problems, and hill-climbing search. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoos, H. H., & Boutilier, C. (2000). Solving combinatorial auctions using stochastic local search. In Proceedings of AAAI-2000.

  14. Jap, S. D. (2002). Online, reverse auctions: issues, themes, and prospects for the future. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 506–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalagnanam, J., & Parkes, D. C. (2003). Auctions, bidding and exchange design. In D. Simchi-Levi, S. D. Wu, & Z. M. Shen (Eds.), Supply chain analysis in the e-business era, Chap. 10.

  16. Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H., & Meyer, R. (1993). Decision making with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Makhorin, A. (2001). GLPK–GNU linear programming toolkit. http://www.gnu.org/directory/GNU/glpk.html. 2001

  18. McAfee, R. P. (1995). Auction design for the real world. http://www.eco.utexas.edu/faculty/McAfee/Papers/PDF/Auction.pdf.

  19. MetalSite. http://www.metalsite.com/.

  20. Reyes-Moro, A., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J. A., Cerquides, J., López-Sánchez, M., & Gutiérrez-Magallanes, D. (2002). Quotes: a negotiation tool for industrial procurement. In Fourth international conference on enterprise information systems (ICEIS 2002), Ciudad Real, Spain, 4–6 April 2002.

  21. Reyes-Moro, A., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J. A., Cerquides, J., López-Sánchez, M., & Gutierrez-Magallanes, D. (2003). Embedding decision support in e-sourcing tools: quotes, a case study. Group Decision and Negotiation Journal, 12, 347–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ribeiro, R. A. (1996). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: a review and new preference elicitation techniques. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78, 155–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rothkopt, M. H., Pekec, A., & Harstad, R. M. (1995). Computationally manageable combinatorial auctions. Management Science, 44(8), 1131–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sandholm, T. (2000). eMediator: a next generation electronic commerce server. In International conference on autonomous agents (AGENTS), Barcelona, Spain, 3–8 June 2000.

  25. Sandholm, T. W. (2002). Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 135, 1–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sandholm, T., Suri, S., Gilpin, A., & Levine, D. (2002). Winner determination in combinatorial auction generalizations. In First international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS’02) (pp. 69–76), Bologna, Italy.

  27. Sandholm, T., & Suri, S. (2006). Side constraints and non-price attributes in markets. Games and Economic Behavior, 55(2), 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stephens Inc. (2001). Internet supply chain team. Strategic sourcing: applications to turn direct materials procurement into competitive advantage. Industry Report, 30 January 2001.

  29. Van de Walle, B., Heitsch, S., & Faratin, P. (2001): Coping with one-to-many multi-criteria negotiations in electronic markets. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on negotiations in electronic markets: beyond price discovery, held during DEXA 2001 (pp. 747–751), Munich, Germany, September 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. WAI Volume Visualization and AI Research Group, Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada i Anàlisi, MAiA, Facultat de Matemàtiques, Universitat de Barcelona, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 585, 08007, Barcelona, Spain

    Jesús Cerquides & Maite López-Sánchez

  2. ATAMA Solutions, Ildefons Cerdà 14, 2º, 08172, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain

    Antonio Reyes-Moro

  3. IIIA-CSIC, Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain

    Juan A. Rodríguez-Aguilar

Authors
  1. Jesús Cerquides
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maite López-Sánchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio Reyes-Moro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juan A. Rodríguez-Aguilar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesús Cerquides.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cerquides, J., López-Sánchez, M., Reyes-Moro, A. et al. Enabling assisted strategic negotiations in actual-world procurement scenarios. Electron Commerce Res 7, 189–220 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-007-9007-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-007-9007-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation