Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Virtual Teams and Multiple Media: Structuring Media Use to Attain Strategic Goals

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Work environments have grown substantially more complex over the years. Teams are increasingly distributed, and presented with a variety of different communication technologies, e.g., e-mail, instant messaging, cellular phones, pagers, and intranet applications, for use in distributed collaborative activities. Further, individuals often belong to multiple teams concurrently. This study explores how virtual team members structure their use of multiple media to attain strategic goals in complex work environments. A grounded theory approach was used to analyze data gathered from forty interviews of information technology workers. Our results indicate that there are two primary structures individuals employ when making use of multiple media: sequential and concurrent. Sequential combinations are of three types: redundant, serial, or complementary, while concurrent combinations are of two types: independent or complementary. Further, individuals strategically use multiple media to accomplish specific communication goals beyond simply transmitting the message, such as message acknowledgement, enhancement of mutual understanding, and participation in multiple communication interactions. The implications of these findings for research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartlett, M. (2002). “Workers Can't Wait to Go Mobile — Study,” ACM Tech News, pp. 1.

  • Bélanger, F., R. Collins, and P. H. Cheney. (2001). “Technology Requirements and Work Group Communication for Telecommuters,” Information Systems Research 12(2), 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudoba, K., E. Wynn, M. Lu, and M. B. Watson-Manheim. (2005). “How Virtual are We? Measuring Virtuality and Understanding its Impact in a Global Organization,” Information Systems Journal 15(4), 279–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. G. (1993). New Approaches to Teams and Teamwork, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L. and R. H. Lengel. (1986). “Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design,” Management Science 32(5), 554–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). “Building Theory from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa, J. A., J. N. Cummings, J. M. Wilson, and B. M. Pearce. (2003). “Team Boundary Issues Across Multiple Global Firms,” Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), 157–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J. (1993). “Social Construction of Communication Technology,” Academy of Management Journal 36(5), 921–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J. and G. DeSanctis. (1995). “Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms,” Organization Science 6(4), 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research Chicago, Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, T. L., J. E. Sawyer, and M. A. Neale. (2003). “Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Teams,” MIS Quarterly 27(3), 265–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M., N. Nohria, and T. Tierney. (1999). “What's Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge,” Harvard Business Review), pp. 106–116.

  • Hollan, J. and Stornetta (1992). “Beyond Being There,” Proceedings of the Proceedings of ACM CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, pp. 119–125.

  • Kiesler, S. and L. Sproull. (1992). “Group Decision Making and Communication Technology,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52, 96–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., C. Steinfeld, A. Chan, B. Butler, and A. Hoag. (1999). “Coordination and Virtualization: The Role of Electronic Networks and Personal Relationships,” Organization Science 10(6), 722–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. E., R. E. Rice, C. Cool, and R. S. Fish. (1998). “Varieties of Social Influence: The Role of Utility and Norms in the Success of a New Communication Medium,” Organization Science 9(4), 437–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luong, A. and S. G. Rogelberg. (2005). “Meetings and More Meetings: The Relationship Between Meeting Load and the Daily Well-Being of Employees,” Group Dynamics-Theory Research And Practice 9(1), 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A., R. E. Rice, A. Malhotra, N. King, and S. Ba. (2000). “Technology Adaptation: The Case of Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team,” MIS Quarterly 24(4), 569–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L. (1990). “Towards a Critical Mass Theory of Interactive Media: Universal Access, Interdependency and Diffusion,” in: J. Fulk and C. Steinfeld (eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications, pp. 194–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L. (1994). “Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice,” Organization Science 5(4), 502–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maznevski, M. L. and K. M. Chudoba. (2000). “Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness,” Organization Science 11(5), 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, S. M. and C. S. Saunders. (2003). “The Social Construction of Meaning: An Alternative Perspective on Information Sharing,” Information Systems Research 14(1), 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, I. E. (1994). “Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Engineering Product Design,” In: R. A. Roe and L. J. H. E. Andriessen (eds.), Telematics and Work. Hillsdale, Erlbaum Associates, pp. 231–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, M. and P. Hinds. (2002). “Fuzzy Teams: Boundary Disagreement in Distributed and Collocated Teams,” in: P. Hinds and S. Kiesler (eds.), Distributed Work: New Research on Working across Distance Using Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 283–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. and S. Whittaker. (2002). “The Place of Face to Face Communication in Distributed Work,” in: Distributed Work: New Research on Working across Distance Using Technology. P. Hinds and S. Kiesler (eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 83–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B., S. Whittaker, and E. Bradner. (2000). “Interaction and Outeraction: Instant Messaging in Action,” Proceedings of the Proceedings of the CSCW Conference, Location, pp. 79–88.

  • National Research Council (1999). “The Changing Nature of Work: Implications for Occupational Analysis,” http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/occup_analysis/, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, accessed 05/28/05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1993). “Learning from Notes: Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation,” The Information Society 9(3), 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). “Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing,” Organization Science 13(3), 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. and J. J. Baroudi. (1991). “Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions,” Information Systems Research 2, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panko, R. (1992). “Managerial Communications Patterns,” Journal of Organizational Computing 2(1), 95–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W., Picolli and B. Ives. (2004). “Virtual Teams: A Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research,” Database 35(1), 6–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennecker, J. and L. Godwin. (2003). “Theorizing the Unintended Consequences of Instant Messaging (IM) Use,” http://weatherhead.cwru.edu/sprouts/2003/030307.pdf, Seattle, WA, accessed December 2005.

  • Robey, D. (1987). “Implementation and the Organizational Impacts of Information Systems,” Interfaces 17(3), 72–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, C. S. and J. Jones. (1990). “Temporal Sequences in Information Acquisition for Decision Making: A Focus on Source and Medium,” Academy of Management Review 15(1), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L. J. (2004). “Work at Home Grows in Past Year by 7.5 in US,” www.workingfromanyywhere.org/ news/pr090204.htm, ITAC Press Release 2004, accessed June 2005.

  • Speier, C., I. Vessey, and J. Valacich. (2003). “The Effects of Interruptions and Information Presentation Formats on Decision Performance,” Decision Sciences 34(4), 771–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub, D. and E. Karahanna. (1998). “Knowledge Worker Communications and Recipient Availability: Toward a Task Closure Explanation of Media Choice,” Organization Science 9(2), 160–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. and J. Corbin. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedure and Techniques, Thousand Oaks, California.

  • Turner, J. W. and C. Tinsley. (2002). “Polychronic Communication: Managing Multiple Conversations at Once,” Proceedings of the Academy of Management, Denver, CO.

  • Watson-Manheim, M. B. and F. Bélanger. (2002). “Support for Communication-Based Work Processes in Virtual Work,” e-Services Quarterly 1(3), 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson-Manheim, M. B. and F. Bélanger. (2005). “Communication Mode Repertoires: Dealing with the Multiplicity of Media Choices,” The Business of Management Research Center and the Imasco Chair in IS Seminar Series, McGill University, Montreal, Canada April 14.

  • Watson-Manheim, M. B., K. C., and K. C. (2002). “Discontinuities and Continuities: A new way to Understand Virtual Work,” Information, Technology, and People 15(3), 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woerner, S. L., W. J. Orlikowski, and J. Yates. (2004). “The Media Toolbox: Combining Media in Organizational Communication,” Proceedings of the Academy of Management, Orlando, FL.

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, USA

    France Bélanger

  2. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA

    Mary Beth Watson-Manheim

Authors
  1. France Bélanger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mary Beth Watson-Manheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to France Bélanger.

Additional information

Both authors contributed equally to this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bélanger, F., Watson-Manheim, M.B. Virtual Teams and Multiple Media: Structuring Media Use to Attain Strategic Goals. Group Decis Negot 15, 299–321 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-006-9044-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-006-9044-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation