Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Exploring high school students’ disciplinary science identities and their differences

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The notion of science identity has been widely discussed in the field of science education in recent years. Many research studies have focused on students’ science identity in a general sense in spite of the fact that students are usually exposed to discipline-specific science courses in high school. We argue that it is more appropriate to explore high school students’ disciplinary identities in natural sciences (i.e. physics, chemistry and biology). A quantitative approach was used to investigate high school students’ disciplinary identities among three science subjects and explore the effects of these identities on students’ intentions to major in college science programs. An instrument addressing three disciplinary identities was administered to 510 students from 10 science classes in seven high schools in Guangzhou, the capital of Guangdong, China. The major findings indicate that high school students had the lowest identity in physics among the three disciplines. Moreover, physics identity was found to be a significant indicator that had the strongest effect on students’ intentions to choose science-related college programs, while biology identity was a non-significant indicator with the weakest effect on intended selection of a college science program. The results of this study have practical implications for enhancing high school students’ science identities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20353

  • Avraamidou, L. (2020). Science identity as a landscape of becoming: Rethinking recognition and emotions through an intersectionality lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09954-7

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Worth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmby, P., & Defty, N. (2006). Secondary school pupils’ perceptions of physics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140600811585

  • Barton, A. C., Kang, H., Tan, E., O’Neill, T. B., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a future in science: Tracing high school girls’ identity work over time and space. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 37–75. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212458142

  • Basu, S. J., Barton, A. C., Clairmont, N., & Locke, D. (2009). Developing a framework for critical science agency through case study in a conceptual physics context. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(2), 345–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9135-8

  • Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<441::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-3

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts applications, and programming. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237

  • Cass, C. A. P., Hazari, Z., Cribbs, J., Sadler, P. M., & Sonnert, G. (2011). Examining the impact of mathematics identity on the choice of engineering careers for male and female students. In Proceedings of the 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. F2H-1–F2H-5). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2011.6142881

  • Chang, M. J., Eagan, M. K., Lin, M. H., & Hurtado, S. (2011). Considering the impact of racial stigmas and science identity: Persistence among biomedical and behavioral science aspirants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(5), 564–596. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2011.0030

  • Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01710.x

  • Chen, C., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. M. (2020). The effect of first high school science teacher’s gender and gender matching on students’ science identity in college. Science Education, 104(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21551

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cribbs, J. D., Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. M. (2015). Establishing an explanatory model for mathematics identity. Child Development, 86(4), 1048–1062.

  • Dabney, K. P., Chakraverty, D., & Tai, R. H. (2013). The association of family influence and initial interest in science. Science Education, 97(3), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21060

  • DeWitt, J., & Archer, L. (2015). Who aspires to a science career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2170–2192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1071899

  • Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., Hernandez, P. R., & Schultz, P. W. (2011). Toward a model of social influence that explains minority student integration into the scientific community. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020743

  • Gardner, P. L. (1998). The development of males’ and females’ interest in science and technology. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and Learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender (pp. 41–57). Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik (IPN) [Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education].

  • Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167322

  • Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2016). Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 312–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20118

  • Hazari, Z., Sadler, P. M., & Sonnert, G. (2013). The science identity of college students: Exploring the intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003.

  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

  • Hosbein, K. N., & Barbera, J. (2020a). Alignment of theoretically grounded constructs for the measurement of science and chemistry identity. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00193J

  • Hosbein, K. N., & Barbera, J. (2020b). Development and evaluation of novel science and chemistry identity measures. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(3), 852–877. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00223E

  • Hurley, A. E., Scandura, T. A., Schriesheim, C. A., Brannick, M. T., Seers, A., Vandenberg, R. J., & Williams, L. J. (1997). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues, and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(6), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199711)18:6<667::AID-JOB874>3.0.CO;2-T

  • Kapucu, S. (2017). Predicting physics achievement: Attitude towards physics, self-efficacy of learning physics, and mathematics achievement. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 18(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215

  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

  • Robinson, K. A., Perez, T., Nuttall, A. K., Roseth, C. J., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2018). From science student to scientist: Predictors and outcomes of heterogeneous science identity trajectories in college. Developmental Psychology, 54(10), 1977–1992. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000567

  • Rüschenpöhler, L., & Markic, S. (2020). Secondary school students’ acquisition of science capital in the field of chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00127A

  • Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136

  • Shaby, N., & Vedder-Weiss, D. (2020). Science identity trajectories throughout school visits to a science museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(5), 733–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21608

  • Shein, P. P., Falk, J. H., & Li, Y. Y. (2019). The role of science identity in science center visits and effects. Science Education, 103(6), 1478–1492. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21535

  • Sjaastad, J. (2012). Sources of Inspiration: The role of significant persons in young people’s choice of science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1615–1636. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.590543

  • Stahl, G., Scholes, L., McDonald, S., & Lunn, J. (2021). Middle years students’ engagement with science in rural and urban communities in Australia: Exploring science capital, place-based knowledges and familial relationships. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 29(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2019.1684351

  • Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143–1144. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128690

  • Trujillo, G., & Tanner, K. D. (2014). Considering the role of affect in learning: Monitoring students’ self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and science identity. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0241

  • Tytler, R. (2014). Attitudes, identity, and aspirations towards science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 82–103). Routledge.

  • Uitto, A. (2014). Interest, attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs explaining upper-secondary school students’ orientation towards biology-related careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1425–1444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9516-2

  • Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2021). Identity complexes and science identity in early secondary: Mono-topical or in combination with other topical identities. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09882-0

  • Wang, J., & Hazari, Z. (2018). Promoting high school students’ physics identity through explicit and implicit recognition. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020111

  • Wang, J., Li, Q., & Luo, Y. (2020). Physics identity of Chinese students before and after Gaokao: The effect of high-stake testing. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09978-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, P., Hazari, Z., Petersen, S., & Neumann, K. (2018). Engaging young women in physics: An intervention to support young women’s physics identity development. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020113

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a research project entitled "Developing a Science Identity Survey Instrument and Applying It in Measuring the Effects of a STEM program" provided by University of Macau (MYRG2019-00134-FED).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing Wei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, S., Wei, B. & Zhang, H. Exploring high school students’ disciplinary science identities and their differences. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 21, 377–394 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10257-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10257-7

Keywords