Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Self-disclosure at social networking sites: An exploration through relational capitals

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research the authors examine member self-disclosure phenomenon at social networking sites. Self-disclosure enables member interactions, service customizations, and digital content generation and hence self-disclosure is imperative to the success of social networking sites. Drawing upon Social Capital Theory, we develop a succinct research model that examines the role of relational capitals in member disclosure behavior. This model also investigates the intricate relationships among relational capitals such as trust, reciprocity, and identification. This research model has been validated through survey data collected from 222 social networking site users and the analysis results provide strong support to the hypothesized relationships. The current study generates new knowledge on the exact role of relational capitals in sustaining social networking sites and it also informs the service providers of social networks to identify strategies that promote member disclosure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Natour, S., Benbasat, I., and Cenfetelli, R. (2009). “The antecedents of customer self-disclosure to online virtual advisors,” International conference on information systems.

  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ba, S., and Pavlou, P.A. (2002). “Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior,” MIS Quarterly (26:3), pp 243, 226.

  • Bateman, P. J., Pike, J. C., & Butler, B. (2011). To disclose or not: Publicness in social networking sites. Information Technology & People, 24(1), 78–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. (2004). “Friendster and publicly articulated social networks,” ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY.

  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications, 13(1), 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazier, J. A., Shao, B. B. M., & Lous, R. D. (2007). Sharing information and building trust through value congruence. Information Systems Frontiers, 9(5), 515–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, S., Das, S., and Rao, H.R. (2008). “An exploratory study of bloggers’ information sharing behavior: The role of online privacy concerns,” Americas conference on information systems.

  • Chin, W. (1998). Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42, 1872–1888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 457–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1971). Test validation. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M.R. (2010). “Social networking goes to school,” Digital Directions, Bethesda, MD.

  • Derlega, V., & Grzelak, J. (1979). Appropriateness of self-disclosure. In G. J. Chelune (Ed.), Self disclosure (pp. 151–176). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, M., Pittard, R., & Sterling, M. (2008). “Self-disclosure and friendship closeness”. Hanover, IN: Hanover College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror the role of image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S.R., and Passerini, K. (2007). “Trust and privacy concern within social netoworking sites: A comparison of facebook and MySpace,” Americas Conference on Information Systems.

  • Facebook “Facebook Statistics,” Facebook.Com, 2010.

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., and Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). “Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems (4:7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Golder, S.A., Wilkinson, D., and Huberman, B.A. (2007). “Rhythms of social interaction: Messaging within a massive online network,” The third international conference on communities and technologies, London, UK.

  • HCI (2010). “Social networking in government: Opportunities and challenges,” Human capital institute, Washington, D.C.

  • Hu, T., & Kettinger, W. J. (2008). “Why people continue to use social networking services: Developing a comprehensive model,” International conference on information systems. Canada: Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(12), 45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, Y., Zhao, Y., & Lin, Y. (2010). “Effects of system characteristics on users’ self-disclosure in social networking sites,” The seventh international conference on information technology. Las Vegas, Nevada: New Generations IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasnova, H., Kolesnikova, E., and Guenther, O. (2009). “It Won’t Happen to Me!: Self-disclosure in online social networks,” Americas conference on information systems.

  • Lambert, S. J. (2006). Both art and science: Employing organizational documentation in workplace-based research. In M. Pitt-Catsouphes, E. E. Kossek, & S. Sweet (Eds.), The work and family handbook: Multi-disciplinary perspectives, methods, and approaches. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, C., Ellison, N.B., and Steinfeld, C. (2007). “A familar Face(book): Profile elements as signals in an online social network,” Conference on human factor in computing systems, New York, NY.

  • Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., and Zickuhr, K. (2010) “Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults,” Pew Internet, Washington, DC.

  • Lo, J. (2010). “Privacy concern, locus of control, and salience in a trust-risk model of information disclosure on social networking sites,”. Lima, Peru: AMCIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, J., & Riemenschneider, C. (2010). “An examination of privacy concernsand trust entities in determining willingness to disclose personal information on a social networking site,”. Lima, Peru: AMCIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 102–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. (2005). “I’m a lot more interesting than a friendster profile: Identity presentation, authenticity, and power in social networking services,” Internet Research 6.0, Chicago, IL.

  • Massari, L. (2009). Analysis of MySpace user profiles. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(4), 361–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, D.H., and Chervany, N.L. (2000). “What is trust? A conceptual analysis and an interdisciplinary model,” The 2000 Americas conference on information systems, Long Beach, CA.

  • Metzger, M.J. (2004). “Privacy, trust, and disclosure: Exploring barriers to electronic commerce,” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication (9:4).

  • Molm, L. D. (1997). Coercive power in social exchange. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morry, M. M. (2005). Allocentrism and friendship satisfaction: The mediating roles of disclosure and closeness. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 37(3), 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, J., & Schaumburg, H. (2004). “Electronic privacy, trust and self-disclosure in e-recruitment,”. Vienna, Austria: CHI2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen (2010) “Social networks/blogs now account for one in every four and a half minutes online,” The Nielsen Company.

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1976). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D.W. (1988) Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome Lexington books, Lexington, MA.

  • Park, N., Jin, B., and Jin, S.-A. (2009) “Motivations, Impression Management, and Self-Disclosure in Social Network Sites,” In: The Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Pike, J.C., Bateman, P.J., and Butler, B. (2009). “I didn’t know you could see that: The effect of social networking environment characteristics on publicness and self-disclosure,” The fifteenth americas conference on information systems, San Francisco, CA.

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-report in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 12(4), 531–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 839–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawlings, W.K. (1983). “Openness as problematic in ongoing friendships: Two conversational dilemmas,” Communication Monographs (50:1), 13.

  • Reidl, R., Hubert, M., & Kenning, P. (2010). Are there neural gender differences in online trust? An FMRI study on the perceived trustworthiness of EBay offers. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 397–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, P.A., and Kluemper, D.H. (2008). “The impact of the big five personality traits on the acceptance of social networking website,” Americas Conference on Information Systems.

  • Sledgianoski, D., and Kulviwat, S. (2008). “Social network sites: Antecedents of user adoption and usage,” Americas Conference on Information Systems.

  • Tow, W.N.-F.H., Dell, P., and Venable, J.R. (2008) “Understanding information disclosure behaviour in Australian facebook users,” 19th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Christchurch.

  • Trepte, S., and Reinecke, L. (2010) “Young scholars network on privacy and web 2.0,” German Research Foundation, Der Bildung.

  • Tyler, T.R., and Blader, S.L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity and behavioral engagement psychology press, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Walker, L. S., & Wright, P. H. (1976). Self-disclosure in friendship. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42(3), 735–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Joreskog, K. G. (1974). Interclass reliablity estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whinston, A.B. (2009). “Opportunities and challenges in analysis of social netowrks,” Americas Conference on Information Systems.

  • Williams, T. A. (1996). Government regulation through voluntary cooperation: A follow-up study of the strategic impact of information technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 5(2), 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H., Parks, R., Chu, C.H., and Zhang, X.L. (2010). “Information disclosure and online social networks: From the case of facebook news feed controversy to a theoretical understanding,” Americas Conference on Information Systems.

  • Zheng, W., and Jin, L. (2009) “Online reputation systems in web 2.0 Era,” AMCIS2009.

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank the Coordinating Editor and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions that have significantly improved the quality of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information Systems and Operations Management, Miller College of Business, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, 47306, USA

    Rui Chen & Sushil K. Sharma

Authors
  1. Rui Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sushil K. Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, R., Sharma, S.K. Self-disclosure at social networking sites: An exploration through relational capitals. Inf Syst Front 15, 269–278 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-011-9335-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-011-9335-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation