Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Communication in virtual world: Second life and business opportunities

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Second Life is an online 3D virtual world imagined and created by its residents. The residents can communicate, explore, participate in social activities, create and trade virtual properties and services. The most common communication media used in Second Life are text, voice, instant messaging and video conferencing. The purpose of the current study is to investigate why people communicate in Second Life and opportunities of making real business value. An online survey from Second Life residents was performed to study communication behavior and business opportunities in Second Life. The theoretical backgrounds used in this study were the communication theory and social systems and word of mouth communications for consumer learning. The result was focused on the effectiveness and superiority of communication in Second Life among other social networking sites such as Facebook, Myspace and Youtube. The communication is significant to policy makers, managers and leaders for information sharing and decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Arakji, R. Y., & Lang, K. R. (2008). Avatar business value analyses: A method for the evaluation of business value creation in virtual commerce. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 9(3), 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Study, 2, 285–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News (2006). Security breach hits online world. Retrieved 14th January 2009, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/5333996.stm

  • Bennett, J., & Beith, M. (2007). Alternate universe [electronic version], newsweekly. Retrieved 15th January 2009, from http://www.newsweek.com/id/32824

  • Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. University of Pennsylvania Publications in Conduct and Communication p. 338.

  • Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W., Engel, J. F. (2001). Consumer behavior. Orlando, FL.

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, D., & Konsynski, B. (2007)v Virtual worlds: Mutli-disciplinary research opportunities. The Database for Advanced Information Systems 38(4). Retrieved March 2nd 2009, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1016485

  • Bruckman, A., & Jensen, C. (2002). Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 21–33). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castranova, E. (2005). Synthetic worlds: The business and culture of online games. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castranova, E. (2001). Virtual worlds: A first-hand account of market and society on the Cyberian frontier. CESinfo Working Paper, No. 618.

  • Chambers, J. (2005). The sponsered avatar: Examining the present reality and future possibilities of advertising in digital games, in Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views Worlds in Play.

  • Chesney, T., Chuah, S., Hoffmann, R. (2007). Virtual world experimentation: An exploratory study. Retrieved 20th March 2008, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1068225

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (2001). PLS-graph user’s guide version 3.0. Houston: C.T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claypool, M., & Claypool, K. (2006). Latency and player actions in online games. Communications of the ACM, 49(11), 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, E. K. (2009). The complex problem of monetizing virtual electronic social networks. Decision Support Systems, 47(4), 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compeau, D. R., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. P., Steur, K., Pagulayan, R. (2005). A survey method for assessing perceptions of a game: The consumer playtest in game design, game studies 5(1). Retrieved May 19th 2007, from http://www.gamestudies.org

  • Dubin, R. (1976). Theory building in applied areas, in handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 17–26). Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. T. (1987). A typology for interactive media. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron: The University of Akron.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Bookstein, L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 440–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fteschrin, M., & Lattermann, C. (2008). User acceptance of virtual world. Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(3), 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, Inc. Press Release (2007). Available at: www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=503861 (accessed 4 March 2009).

  • Guo, Y., & Barnes, S. (2007). Why people buy virtual items in virtual worlds with real money. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 38(4), 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckel, P. (1991). The elements of friendly software design (new ed.). Alameda: SYBEX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, R. M., & Durlach, N. I. (1992). Telepresence and presence. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemp, P. (2006). Avatar-based marketing. Harvard Business Review, 84(6), 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, C. W., Pakath, R., & Sasidharan, S. (2005). A website interface design framework for the cognitively impaired: A study in the context of Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6(4), 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, D., & Lastowka, F. (2005). The laws of the virtual worlds. California Law Review, 92(1).

  • Hustad, E., & Teigland, R. (2008). Implementing social networking media and web 2.0 in multinationals: Implications for knowledge management. Proceedings of The 9th European Conference on Knowledge Management, 323–331.

  • Jiming, W., Peng, T. C., & Rao, S. (2008). Why they enjoy virtual game worlds? an empirical investigation. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 9, 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevin, S. L. (2007). The online identity and deviant behavior: Who are you in MMORPG? USA: Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H., Park, J. Y., Kim, D. Y., Moon, H. I., & Chun, H. C. (2002). E-lifestyle and motives to use online games. Irish Marketing Review, 15(2), 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleeberger, J. (2002). Online-gaming as a marketing and sales catalyst. Switzerland: Department of Media and Communication, University of St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurel, B. (1986). Interface as mimesis. In D. N. Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), User-centered system design (pp. 67–86). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leimster, J. M., Pascal, S., Helmut K. (2004). Success factors of virtual communities from the perspective of members and operators: An empirical study, 2004. 37th Hawai International Conference on System Sciences.

  • Leo, S. W., & Kim, J. Y. (2005). The comparison of online game experiences by players in games of ‘lineage’ and ‘everquest’: Role play vs. consumption. Digra conference: Changing views- worlds in play.

  • Lohmoller, J. (1989). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P. B., Robert, T. L., Romano, N. C., Cheney, P. D., & Hightower, R. T. (2006). The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication. Small Group Research, 3796, 631–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucia, A. D., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2008). Development and evolution of a virtual campus on second life: The case of second DMI. Computers in Education, 52, 220–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lui, T. W., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2007). Marketing strategies in virtual worlds. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 38(4), 77–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. (1994). Factor analysis. In B. F. J. Manly (Ed.), Multivariate statistical methods. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, F., & Christoph, L. (2008). User acceptance of virtual world. Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(3), 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L. (1994). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science, 5(4), 502–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messinger, P. R., Stroulia, E., Lyons, K., Bone, M., Niud, R. H., Smirnova, K., & Perelgute, S. (2009). Virtual worlds-past, present and future: New direction in social computing. Decision Support Systems, 47, 204–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. (2005). Communication theories: Perspectives, processes, and contexts (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. N. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0? [web log post]. Retrieved June 23rd 2011, from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html

  • Peter, R., Mark, B., Aukje, T., & Marcia, L. (2008). Face to face with white rabbit: Sharing ideas in second life. New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1994). Interactivity on the nets, information systems and human communication technology divisions, in ICA Annual Conference (Sydney, Australia, 1994).

  • Reeves, B., & Nass, C. I. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television and new media real people and places. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riva, G. (1997). Virtual reality as assessment tool in psychology: Virtual reality in neuro-psycho-physiology, Netherlands. International Journal o f Information Management, 17(4), 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, E. (2007). Setting the research agenda. The Database for Advances in Information Systems, 38(4), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence, 1(1), 120–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Research Foundation. (2008). Second life survey. New York: Social Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2000). Source orientation in human-computer interaction: Programmer, networker, or independent social actor? Communication Research, 27(6), 683–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steve, H., Sharon, G., Miko, A., et al. (2008). Collaboration opportunities in second life: Collective experiences (pp. 114–119). Australia: University of Western Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talamasca, A. (2006). Second life addiction: Do you have a problem? retrieved June 12th 2007, from http://www.secondlifeinsider.com/2006/10/13/sl-addiction-do-you-have-aproblem/

  • Teltzrow, M., Meyer, B., & Lenz, H. J. (2007). Multi-channel consumer perceptions. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 8(1), 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valck, K. D., Bruggen, G. H., & Wierenga, B. (2009). Virtual communities: A marketing perspective. Decision Support System, 47, 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedrashko, I. (2006). Advertising in computer games. Cambridge: Department of Comparative and Media Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., & Liu, D. (2007). The effects of trust and enjoyment on intention to play online games. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 8, 128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., Urbanek, M., Chang, F., & Merget, D. (2007). The unbearable likeness of being digital: The persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 10(1), 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, N. (2001). The Norrathian scrolls: A study of everquest. Retrieved October 10th 2008, from http://www.nickyee.com/eqt/report.html

  • Yi, M. Y., & Davis, F. D. (2003). Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 146–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younghwa, L., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2007). Avatar e-mail verses traditional e-mail: Perceptual difference and media selection difference. Decision Support Systems, 46(2), 451–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, Y. (2005). Does electronic business create value for firms? an organizational innovation perspective. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6(2), 146–159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to extend our thanks to Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, China for providing supports to conduct and complete this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, 92 West Dazhi Street, Nangang District, Harbin, 150001, People’s Republic of China

    Gajendra Sharma, Ye Qiang, Sun Wenjun & Lu Qi

Authors
  1. Gajendra Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ye Qiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sun Wenjun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lu Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gajendra Sharma.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 8 Items for second life communication measure
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, G., Qiang, Y., Wenjun, S. et al. Communication in virtual world: Second life and business opportunities. Inf Syst Front 15, 677–694 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-012-9347-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-012-9347-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation