Abstract
SMILES strings and other classic 2D structural formats offer a convenient way to represent molecules as a simplistic connection table, with the inherent advantages of ease of handling and storage. In the context of virtual screening, chemical databases to be screened are often initially represented by canonicalised SMILES strings that can be filtered and pre-processed in a number of ways, resulting in molecules that occupy similar regions of chemical space to active compounds of a therapeutic target. A wide variety of software exists to convert molecules into SMILES format, namely, Mol2smi (Daylight Inc.), MOE (Chemical Computing Group) and Babel (Openeye Scientific Software). Depending on the algorithm employed, the atoms of a SMILES string defining a molecule can be ordered differently. Upon conversion to 3D coordinates they result in the production of ostensibly the same molecule.
In this work we show how different permutations of a SMILES string can affect conformer generation, affecting reliability and repeatability of the results. Furthermore, we propose a novel procedure for the generation of conformers, taking advantage of the permutation of the input strings—both SMILES and other 2D formats, leading to more effective sampling of conformation space in output, and also implementing fingerprint and principal component analyses step to post process and visualise the results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hou T, Xu X (2004) Curr Pharm Des 10(9):1011
Liao C, Liu B, Shi L, Zhou J, Lu XP (2005) Eur J Med Chem 40(7):632
Bringmann BKA (2004) Frequent SMILES. Lernen, Wissensentdeckung und Adaptivität, Workshop GI Fachgruppe Maschinelles Lernen, part of LWA 2004
Weininger D (1988) J Chem Inf Comput 28:31
Knox AJS, Meegan MJ, Carta G, Lloyd DG (2005) J Chem Inf Model 45(6):1908–19
Vigers GP, Rizzi JP (2004) J Med Chem 47(1):80–89
Kauppi B, Jakob C, Farnegardh M, Yang J, Ahola H, Alarcon M, Calles K, Engstrom O, Harlan J, Muchmore S, Ramqvist AK, Thorell S, Ohman L, Greer J, Gustafsson JA, Carlstedt-Duke J, Carlquist M (2003) J Biol Chem 278(25):22748
Cronet P, Petersen JF, Folmer R, Blomberg N, Sjoblom K, Karlsson U, Lindstedt EL, Bamberg K (2001) Structure (Camb) 9(8):699
Daylight Chemical Informations Systems Inc. (URL: http://www.daylight.com)
Molecular Operating Environment (MOE), developed and distributed by Chemical Computing Group (http://wwwchemcompcom)
Babel v2.0A3, distributed by Openeye Scientific Software
Chemsketch v8.17, www.acdlabs.com
Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T, Klebe G (1996) J Mol Biol 261(3):470
Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R (1997) J Mol Biol 267(3):727
CORINA 3.6, distributed by Molecular Networks GmbH
Cambridge Structural Database, http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/
OMEGA 1.8.1, distributed by Openeye Scientific Software
Catalyst v4.9.1, www.accelrys.com
RUBICON, distributed by Daylight Chemical Informations Systems Inc
Shanno DF, Phua KH (1980) ACM Trans Math Software 6:618
Bostrom J, Greenwood JR, Gottfries J (2003) J Mol Graph Model 21(5):449
Bostrom J (2001) J Comput Aided Mol Des 15(12):1137
Ivanciuc O (2003) In: Gasteiger J (ed) Handbook of chemoinformatic , vol. 1. p 103
Kudo Y, Sasaki S (1974) J Chem Document 14(4):200
Babel 1.100.2, Distributed by Openeye Scientific Software
oechem, RMSD, Distributed by Openeye Scientific Software
Acknowledgement
This work was supported through funding from Science Foundation Ireland and the Irish Health Research Board.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carta, G., Onnis, V., Knox, A.J.S. et al. Permuting input for more effective sampling of 3D conformer space. J Comput Aided Mol Des 20, 179–190 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-006-9044-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-006-9044-4