Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Fault Diagnosis in Highly Dependable Medical Wearable Systems

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High levels of dependability are required to promote the adherence by public and medical communities to wearable medical devices. The study presented herein addresses fault detection and diagnosis in these systems. The main objective resides on correctly classifying the captured physiological signals, in order to distinguish whether the actual cause of a detected anomaly is a wearer health condition or a system functional flaw. Data fusion techniques, namely fuzzy logic, artificial neural networks, decision trees and naive Bayes classifiers are employed to process the captured data to increase the trust levels with which diagnostics are made. Concerning the wearer condition, additional information is provided after classifying the set of signals into normal or abnormal (e.g., arrhythmia, tachycardia and bradycardia). As for the monitoring system, once an abnormal situation is detected in its operation or in the sensors, a set of tests is run to check if actually the wearer shows a degradation of his health condition or if the system is reporting erroneous values. Selected features from the vital signals and from quantities that characterize the system performance serve as inputs to the data fusion algorithms for Patient and System Status diagnosis purposes. The algorithms performance was evaluated based on their sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Based on these criteria the naive Bayes classifier presented the best performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Portuguese acronym for integrated cardiovascular surveillance system.

References

  1. Abbod MF, von Keyserlingk DG, Linkens DA, Mahfouf M (2001) Survey of utilisation of fuzzy technology in Medicine and Healthcare. Fuzzy Sets Syst 120(2):331–349

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alemzadeh H, Jin Z, Kalbarczyk Z, Iyer R (2011) An embedded reconfigurable architecture for patient-specific multi-paramater medical monitoring. In: 2011 Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society,EMBC, pp 1896–1900

  3. Amour N, Hersi A, Alajlan N, Bazi Y, AlHichri H (2015) Implementation of a Mobile Health System for Monitoring ECG signals. Working Paper, Academy of Science and Engineering, USA

  4. Bates JHT, Young MP (2003) Applying fuzzy logic to medical decision making in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167(7):948–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Becker K, Thull B, Ksmacher-Leidinger H, Stemmer J, Rau G, Kalff G, Zimmermann HJ (1997) Design and validation of an intelligent patient monitoring and alarm system based on a fuzzy logic process model. Artif Intell Med 11(1):33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, Belmont

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cinque M, Coronato A, Testa A (2012) Dependable services for mobile health monitoring systems. Int J Ambient Comput Intell 4(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Delano MK, Sodini CG (2013) A long-term wearable electrocardiogram measurement system. In: 2013 IEEE International conference on body sensor networks (BSN), pp 1–6

  9. Elgendi M, Eskofier B, Dokos S, Abbott D (2014) Revisiting QRS detection methodologies for portable, wearable, Battery-Operated, and wireless ECG systems. PLoS ONE 9(1):e84,018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Glass L, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov PC, Mark RG, Mietus JE, Moody GB, Peng CK, Stanley HE (2000) Physiobank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals. Circulation 101(23):e215–e220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hao S (2013) A self-calibration method for an implantable displacement sensor. In: Microwaves, communications, antennas and electronics systems (COMCAS), 2013 IEEE international conference on, pp 1–5

  12. Hovakeemian Y, Naik K, Nayak A (2011) A survey on dependability in body area networks. In: 2011 5Th international symposium on medical information communication technology (ISMICT), pp 10–14

  13. Karjalainen JVM (1986) Fever and cardiac rhythm. Arch Intern Med 146(6):1169–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kenneth E, Rajendra AU, Kannathal N, Lim CM (2005) Data fusion of multimodal cardiovascular signals. In: Engineering in medicine and biology society, 2005. IEEE-EMBS 2005. 27th annual international conference of the, pp 4689–4692

  15. Khan M, Kerkhoff H (2011) Soc mixed-signal dependability enhancement: A strategy from design to end-of-life. In: 2011 IEEE International symposium on defect and fault tolerance in VLSI and nanotechnology systems (DFT), pp 374–381

  16. Kligfield P, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, Childers R, Deal BJ, Hancock EW, Herpen VM, Kors JA, Macfarlane P, Mirvis DM, Pahlm O, Rautaharju P, Wagner GS (2007) Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram Part I: The Electrocardiogram and Its Technology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation 115(10):1306– 1324

    Google Scholar 

  17. Le Floch F, Bernard S, Bontorin G, Soulier F, Cathebras G (2011) Global strategy to guaranty dependability of electrical medical implanted devices. In: 2011 5Th international IEEE/EMBS conference on neural engineering (NER), pp 515–518

  18. Lesbros G, Sawan M (2006) Wireless implantable sensing device for in-vivo monitoring of electrode-tissues contact variation. In: Computer architecture for machine perception and sensing, 2006. CAMP 2006. International workshop on, pp 67–68

  19. Mahfouf M, Abbod MF, Linkens DA (2001) A survey of fuzzy logic monitoring and control utilisation in medicine. Artif Intell Med 21(13):27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Møller MF (1993) A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Netw 6(4):525–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oliveira C, Almeida N, Machado da Silva J (2013) A stent-graft endoleakage monitor: Telemetry system based on inductive-coupling transmission for implantable pressure sensors. In: Bioengineering (ENBENG), 2013 IEEE 3rd portuguese meeting in, pp 1–4

  22. Oliveira C, Sepúlveda A, Almeida N, Wardle B, Machado da Silva J, Rocha L (2015) Implantable flexible pressure measurement system based on inductive coupling. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 62(2):680–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oliveira C, Machado da Silva J (2012) Fault detection system for a stent-graft endoleakage monitor. In: Mixed-signals, sensors and systems test workshop (IMS3TW), 2012 18th international, pp 17–21

  24. Oliveira C, Machado da Silva J, Trindade I, Martins F (2014) Characterization of the electrode-skin impedance of textile electrodes. In: 2014 Conference on design of circuits and integrated circuits (DCIS), pp 1–6

  25. Oliveira C C, Silva JMd (2015) A fuzzy logic approach for highly dependable medical wearable systems. In: Mixed-signal testing workshop (IMSTW), 2015 20th international, pp 1–5

  26. Pan J, Tompkins WJ (1985) A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME 32 (3):230–236. doi:10.1109/TBME.1985.325532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paradiso R, Loriga G, Taccini N (2005) A wearable health care system based on knitted integrated sensors. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 9(3):337–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Salazar A, da Silva JM, Correia M, Mendes BJ (2014) Built-in self-testing methodology and infrastructure for an emg monitoring sensor module. IARIA Int J Adv Syst Meas 7(1-2):68–79

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stratigopoulos HG, Makris Y (2008) Error moderation in low-cost machine-learning-based analog/rf testing. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 27(2):339–351. doi:10.1109/TCAD.2007.907232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Trindade I, Martins F, Dias R, Oliveira C, Machado da Silva J (2015) Novel textile systems for the continuous monitoring of vital signals: design and characterization. In: 2015 37th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC), pp 3743–3746

  31. Wan J, Kerkhoff H (2011) Boosted gain programmable opamp with embedded gain monitor for dependable SoCs. In: Soc design conference (ISOCC), 2011 international, pp 294–297

  32. Welch J, Ford P, Teplick R, Rubsamen R (1991) The massachusetts general hospital-marquette foundation hemodynamic and electrocardiographic database – comprehensive collection of critical care waveforms. J Clin Monit 7(1):96–97

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zadeh LA (1988) Fuzzy Logic. Computer 21(4):83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been financed by the ERDF - European Regional Development Fund through the COMPETE Programme (operational programme for competitiveness) and by National Funds through the FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) within project SIVIC PTDC/EEI-ELC/1838/2012 (FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-028937), and grant contract SFRH/BD/81476/2011 (first author).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina C. Oliveira.

Additional information

Responsible Editors: G. Léger and C. Wegener.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oliveira, C.C., da Silva, J.M. Fault Diagnosis in Highly Dependable Medical Wearable Systems. J Electron Test 32, 467–479 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-016-5602-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-016-5602-4

Keywords