Abstract
Manufacturing today has become global in all aspects marketing, design, production, distribution, etc. While product family design has been an essential viewpoint for meeting the demand for product variety, its interaction with the issues of supply chain, market systems, etc. makes the meaning of product family both broad and more complicated. In this paper we call such situation ‘global product family,’ and first characterizes its components and complexity. Following this, we proposes a mathematical model for the simultaneous design problem of module commonalization strategies under the given product architecture and supply chain configuration through selection of manufacturing sites for module production, assembly and final distribution as an instance of the problems. In the model, the choice of modules and various sites are represented with 0-1 design variables with the volume of production and transportation represented with non-negative continuous design variables, and the objective defined on total cost. An optimization method is configured with a genetic algorithm and a simplex method for such a mixed integer programming problem. Some numerical case studies are included to determine the validity and promise of the developed mathematical model and algorithm. Finally, we conclude with some discussion of future work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Akai, R., Amaya, H., & Fujita, K. (2010). Product family deployment through optimal resource allocation under market system. In Proceedings of the 2010 ASME design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, paper no. DETC2010-28662.
Chiu, M.-C., & Okudan, G. (2011). An integrative methodology for product and supply chain design decisions at the product design stage. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design, 133(2):021008-1–021008-15.
Friedman T. L. (2005) The world is flat. A brief history of the twenty-first century. Farrar Straus and Giroux, New York, NY
Fujita, K., & Ishii, K. (1997). Task structuring toward computational approaches to product variety design. In Proceedings of the 1997 ASME design engineering technical conferences, paper no. 97DETC/DAC-3766.
Fujita, K., Sakaguchi, H. & Akagi, S. (1999). Product variety deployment and its optimization under modular architecture and module commonalization. In Proceedings of the 1999 ASME design engineering technical conferences, paper no. DETC99/DFM-8923.
Fujita K. (2002) Product variety optimization under modular architecture. Computer-Aided Design 34(12): 953–965
Fujita K., Yoshida H. (2004) Product variety optimization simultaneously designing module combination and module attributes. Concurrent Engineering—Research and Applications 12(2): 105–118
Gonzalez-Zugasti J. P., Otto K. N., Whitcomb C. A. (2007) Options-based multi-objective evaluation of product platforms. Naval Engineers Journal 119(3): 89–106
Hui L., Azarm S. (2002) An approach for product line design selection under uncertainty and competition. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design 124(3): 385–392
Iyer A., Seshadri S., Vasher R. (2009) Toyota supply chain management: A strategic approach to Toyota’s renowned system. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
Jiao J., Lim C. M., Kumar A. (2006) Real option identification and valuation for the financial analysis of product family design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Part B: Journal of engineering manufacture 220(6): 929–939
Jiao J., Simpson T. W., Siddique Z. (2007) Product family design and platform-based product development: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18(1): 5–29
Lamothe J., Hadj-Hamou K., Aldanondo M. (2006) An optimization model for selecting a product family and designing its supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research 169(3): 1030–1047
Michalek J.J., Ceryan O., Papalambros P.Y., Koren Y. (2006) Balancing marketing and manufacturing objectives in product line design. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design 128(6): 1196–1204
Nikkei Monozukuri. (2010, October). New MARCH that will be mass-produced at an emerging country (in Japanese). Tokyo: Nikkei Business Publications.
Olivarres-Benitez E., Gonzalez-Belarde J. L. (2008) A metaheuristic approach for selecting a common platform for modular products based on product performance and manufacturing cost. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 19(5): 599–610
Pine B. J. (1993) Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Simchi-Levi D., Kaminsky P., Simchi-Levi E. (1999) Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies, and cases. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, NY
Simpson, T. W., Siddique, Z., Jiao, J. (eds) (2005) Product platform and product family design: Methods and applications. Springer, New York, NY
Su, J. C. P., Lin, Y. C., & Lee, V. (2010). Component commonality in closed-loop manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (published online). doi:10.1007/s10845-010-0485-1.
Suh E. S., de Weck O., Kim I. Y., Chang D. (2007) Flexible platform component design under uncertainty. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18(1): 115–126
Ulrich E. (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy 24(3): 419–440
Wassenaar H. J., Chen W. (2003) An approach to decision-based design with discrete choice analysis for demand modeling. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design 125(3): 490–497
Zacharias N. Z., Yassine A. A. (2008) Optimal platform investment for product family design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 19(2): 131–148
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fujita, K., Amaya, H. & Akai, R. Mathematical model for simultaneous design of module commonalization and supply chain configuration toward global product family. J Intell Manuf 24, 991–1004 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0641-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0641-x