Abstract
In this paper we continue the study of Roman dominating functions in graphs. A signed Roman dominating function (SRDF) on a graph G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{−1,1,2} satisfying the conditions that (i) the sum of its function values over any closed neighborhood is at least one and (ii) for every vertex u for which f(u)=−1 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f(v)=2. The weight of a SRDF is the sum of its function values over all vertices. The signed Roman domination number of G is the minimum weight of a SRDF in G. We present various lower and upper bounds on the signed Roman domination number of a graph. Let G be a graph of order n and size m with no isolated vertex. We show that \(\gamma _{\mathrm{sR}}(G) \ge\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}} \sqrt{n} - n\) and that γ sR(G)≥(3n−4m)/2. In both cases, we characterize the graphs achieving equality in these bounds. If G is a bipartite graph of order n, then we show that \(\gamma_{\mathrm{sR}}(G) \ge3\sqrt{n+1} - n - 3\), and we characterize the extremal graphs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/640ad/640ad07e3dc871478689c43810a31f63ed7ce186" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chambers W, Kinnersley B, Prince N, West DB (2009) Extremal problems for Roman domination. SIAM J Discrete Math 23:1575–1586
Cockayne EJ, Dreyer Jr PA, Hedetniemi SM, Hedetniemi ST (2004) Roman domination in graphs. Discrete Math 278:11–22
Cockayne EJ, Grobler PJP, Grundlingh W, Munganga J, van Vuuren JH (2005) Protection of a graph. Util Math 67:19–32
Dunbar J, Hedetniemi ST, Henning MA, Slater PJ (1995) Signed domination in graphs. Graph Theory Comb Appl 1:311–322
Favaron O (1996) Signed domination in regular graphs. Discrete Math 158:287–293
Fernau H (2008) Roman domination: a parameterized perspective. Int J Comput Math 85:25–38
Furedi Z, Mubayi D (1999) Signed domination in regular graphs and set-systems. J Comb Theory, Ser B 76:223–239
Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998) Fundamentals of domination in graphs. Dekker, New York
Henning MA (1998) Dominating functions in graphs. In: Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (eds) Domination in graphs: vol II. Dekker, New York, pp 31–62
Henning MA (2002) A characterization of Roman trees. Discuss Math, Graph Theory 22(2):325–334
Henning MA (2003) Defending the Roman empire from multiple attacks. Discrete Math 271:101–115
Henning MA, Hedetniemi ST (2003) Defending the Roman empire–a new strategy. Discrete Math 266:239–251
ReVelle CS (1997) Can you protect the Roman empire? Johns Hopkins Mag 49(2):40
ReVelle CS, Rosing KE (2000) Defendens imperium Romanum: a classical problem in military strategy. Am Math Mon 107(7):585–594
Song X, Wang X (2006) Roman domination number and domination number of a tree. Chin Q J Math 21:358–367
Stewart I (1999) Defend the Roman empire! Sci Am December:136–138
Zhang Z, Xu B, Li Y, Liu L (1999) A note on the lower bounds of signed domination number of a graph. Discrete Math 195:295–298
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the referees for their helpful comments and suggestions to improve the exposition and readability of the paper.
Research of the second author was supported in part by the South African National Research Foundation and the University of Johannesburg. Research of the fourth author was partially supported by the Nature Science Foundation of Anhui Provincial Education Department (No. KJ2011B090). Research of the third author was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GZ: LO 1758/1-1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abdollahzadeh Ahangar, H., Henning, M.A., Löwenstein, C. et al. Signed Roman domination in graphs. J Comb Optim 27, 241–255 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-012-9500-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-012-9500-0