Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

A general framework for convexity analysis in deterministic global optimization

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In previous work, we, and also Epperly and Pistikopoulos, proposed an analysis of general nonlinear programs that identified certain variables as convex, not ever needing subdivision, and non-convex, or possibly needing subdivision in branch and bound algorithms. We proposed a specific algorithm, based on a generated computational graph of the problem, for identifying such variables. In our previous work, we identified only independent variables in the computational graph. Here, we examine alternative sets of non-convex variables consisting not just of independent variables, but of a possibly smaller number of intermediate variables. We do so with examples and theorems. We also apply variants of our proposed analysis to the well-known COCONUT Lib-1 test set. If the number of such non-convex variables is sufficiently small, it may be possible to fully subdivide them before analysis of ranges of objective and constraints, thus dispensing totally with the branch and bound process. Advantages to such a non-adaptive process include higher predictability and easier parallizability. We present an algorithm and exploratory results here, with a more complete empirical study in a subsequent paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belotti P., Lee J., Liberti L., Margot F., Wächter A.: Branching and bounds tightening techniques for non-convex MINLP. Optim. Methods Softw. 24(4–5), 597–634 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Epperly T.G.W., Pistikopoulos E.N.: A reduced space branch and bound algorithm for global optimization. J. Glob. Optim. 11(3), 287–311 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Floudas, C.: Deterministic global optimization: advances and challenges, June 2009. Plenary Lecture, First World Congress on Global Optimization in Engineering and Sciences, WCGO-2009

  4. Griewank, A.: Evaluating Derivatives: Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation. Number 19 in Frontiers in Appl. Math. SIAM, Philadelphia (2000)

  5. Kearfott R.B.: GlobSol user guide. Optim. Methods Softw. 24(4–5), 687–708 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kearfott R.B.: Interval computations, rigour and non-rigour in deterministic continuous global optimization. Optim. Methods Softw. 26(2), 259–279 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kearfott, R.B., Castille, J.M., Tyagi, G.: Assessment of a non-adaptive deterministic global optimization algorithm for problems with low-dimensional non-convex subspaces. Optim. Methods Softw. (submitted) (2011). http://interval.louisiana.edu/preprints/2011-optimization-by-discretization.pdf

  8. Kearfott R.B., Hongthong S.: Validated linear relaxations and preprocessing: some experiments. SIAM J. Optim. 16(2), 418–433 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McCormick, G.P.: Converting general nonlinear programming problems to separable nonlinear programming problems. Technical Report T-267, George Washington University, Washington (1972)

  10. McCormick G.P.: Computability of global solutions to factorable nonconvex programs. Math. Prog. 10(2), 147–175 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Neumaier, A.: COCONUT Web page, 2001–2003. http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/ñeum/glopt/coconut

  12. Neumaier A., Shcherbina O.: Safe bounds in linear and mixed-integer programming. Math. Prog. 99(2), 283–296 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ninin, J.: Optimisation Globale Basée sur l’Analyse d’Intervalles: Relaxations Affines et Techniques d’Accélération. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France (December 2010)

  14. Ninin J., Messine F.: A metaheuristic methodology based on the limitation of the memory of interval branch and bound algorithms. J. Glob. Optim. 50, 629–644 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rall L.B., Corliss G.F.: An introduction to automatic differentiation. In: Berz, M., Bischof, C.H., Corliss, G.F., Griewank, A. (eds) Computational Differentiation: Techniques, Applications, and Tools, pp. 1–17. SIAM, Philadelphia (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roy, J.: Singularities in Deterministic Global Optimization. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana, Lafayette (May 2010)

  17. Schichl H., Neumaier A.: Interval analysis on directed acyclic graphs for global optimization. J. Glob. Optim. 33(4), 541–562 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shcherbina O., Neumaier A., Sam-Haroud D., Vu X.-H., Nguyen T.-V.: Benchmarking global optimization and constraint satisfaction codes. In: Bliek, C., Jermann, C., Neumaier, A. (eds) COCOS, volume 2861 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 211–222. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smith E.M.B., Pantelides C.C.: A symbolic reformulation/spatial branch-and-bound algorithm for the global optimisation of nonconvex MINLPs. Comput. Chem. Eng. 23(4–5), 457–478 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tawarmalani M., Sahinidis N.V.: Global optimization of mixed-integer nonlinear programs: atheoretical and computational study. Math. Program. 99(3), 563–591 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Baker Kearfott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kearfott, R.B., Castille, J. & Tyagi, G. A general framework for convexity analysis in deterministic global optimization. J Glob Optim 56, 765–785 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-012-9905-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-012-9905-4

Keywords