Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Implementing a Pharmacy System: Facilitators and Barriers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To describe facilitators and barriers to the implementation of an inpatient pharmacy system at two pediatric hospitals. Interviews, pre- and post-implementation, were conducted with pharmacy and clinical managers. Key findings from the pre-implementation survey were included in the post-implementation survey to further assess facilitators and barriers to the adoption of a pharmacy system. The majority of pharmacy participants and all clinical leaders believed that project goals were being met. Pharmacist’s described staff readiness-to-change as the most significant facilitator to adoption and concerns with the usability of information in the pediatric drug file as the most significant barrier. Clinical managers described system training and education as the most significant facilitator to adoption and adjustment to new work processes as the most significant barrier. We described major facilitators and barriers to the adoption of an inpatient pharmacy system at two pediatric hospitals. Strategies identified by our informants to overcome barriers may promote successful pharmacy implementations at other pediatric facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S., eds, Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington DC. National Academy Press, 1999.

  2. Bates, D. W., Cullen, D. J., Laird, N., et al., Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 274:29–34, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bobb, A., Gleason, K., Husch, M., et al., The epidemiology of prescribing errors: the potential impact of computerized prescribing order entry. Archives of Internal Medicine. 164:785–792, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ebbesen, J., Juajordet, I., Erikssen, J., et al., Drug-related deaths in a department of internal medicine. Archives of Internal Medicine. 161:2317–2323, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lazarou, J., Pomeranz, B. H., and Corey, P. N., Incidence of adverse drug reaction in hospitalized patients. JAMA. 277:301–311, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leape, L. L., Bates, D. W., Cullen, D. J., et al., Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 274:35–43, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crawley, E., Williams, R., and Cousins, D., Medication errors in children: a descriptive summary of medication error reports submitted to the United States Pharmacopeia. Current Therapeutic Research. 26:627–640, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaushal, R., Bates, D., Landrigan, C., et al., Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. JAMA. 285:2114–2120, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Institute of Medicine, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington DC. National Academy Press, 2001.

  10. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Drugs, Committee on Hospital Care, Prevention of medication errors in the pediatric inpatient setting. Pediatrics. 112:431–436, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berg, M., Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. International Journal of Medical Information. 64:143–156, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gray, M. D., and Felkey, B. G., Computerized prescriber order entry systems: evaluation, selection and implementation. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 61:190–197, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Poon, E. G., Blumenthal, D., JAggi, T., et al., Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in US hospitals. Health Affairs. 23:184–190, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmad, A., Teater, P., Bentley, T., et al., Key attributes of a successful physician order entry system implementation in a multi-hospital environment. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 9(1):16–24, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sengstach, P., and Gugerty, B., CPOE systems: success factors and implementation issues. Journal of Healthcare Information Management. 18(1):36–45, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ash, J. S., Stavri, P. Z., and Kuperman, G. J., A consensus statement on considerations for a successful CPOE implementation. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 10(3):229–234, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ash, J. S., Gorman, P. N., Lavelle, M., et al., A cross-site qualitative study of physician order entry. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 10:188–200, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Doebbeling, B. N., Chou, A. F., and Tierney, W. M., Priorities and strategies for the implementation of integrated informatics and communications technology to improve evidence-based practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 21:S50–S57, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hersh, W., Health care information technology: progress and barriers. JAMA. 292(18):2273–2274, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ash, J. S., Sittig, D. F., Poon, E. G., et al., The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 14(4):415–423, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Naeem, A. A., Hagop, S. M., Kuehn, L., Bently, T. D., Kumar, R., et al., Specificity of computerized physician order entry has significant effect on the efficiency of workflow for critically ill patients. Critical Care Medicine. 33(1):110–114, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gerstle, R. S., and Lehmann, C. U., Electronic Prescribing systems in pediatrics: the rationale and functionality requirements. Pediatrics. 119:e1413–e1422, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grossman, J. M., Gland, A., Reed, M. C., et al., Physicians’ Experiences using commercial e-prescribing systems. Health Affairs. 10:w393–w404, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Upperman, J. S., Staley, P., Friend, K., et al., The introduction of computerized physician order entry and change management in a tertiary pediatric hospital. Pediatrics. 116(5):e634–e642, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cordero, L., Kuehn, L., Kumar, R. R., and Mekhjan, H. S., Impact of computerized physician order entry on clinical practice in a newborn intensive care unit. Journal of Perinatology. 24:88–93, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Potts, A. L., Barr, F. E., Gregory, D. F., Wright, L., and Patel, N. R., Computerized physician order entry and medication errors in a pediatric critical care unit. Pediatrics. 113:59–63, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ammenwerth, E., Mansmann, U., Carola, I., et al., Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 10:69–84, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bradburn, N., Sudman, S., and Wansink, B., Asking questions: The definitive guide to questionnaire design. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ash, J. S., and Bates, D. W., Factors and forces affecting HER system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 12:8–12, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Saleem, J. J., Patterson, E. S., Militello, L., Render, M. L., Orshanshy, G., et al., Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical reminders. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 12:438–447, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Davidson, E., and William, C., Planning and managing computerized order entry: a case study of IT-enabled organizational transformation. Top Health Information Management. 19(4):47–61, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This project was supported by grant number 1 UC1 HSO15236 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven D. Culler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Culler, S.D., Jose, J., Kohler, S. et al. Implementing a Pharmacy System: Facilitators and Barriers. J Med Syst 33, 81–90 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9167-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9167-3

Keywords