Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Separating the effects of task load and task motivation on the effort–fatigue relationship

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study is reported on the effects of task load and task motivation on the relationship between effort and fatigue in a demanding life-support simulation, aimed to test the hypothesis that effort, rather than demands, was the direct cause of fatigue in task performance. This was done by independently manipulating two factors that affect effort: task load and task motivation. A total of 28 participants were tested in a mixed 3 × 2 factorial design; task load (within-Ss) was varied in terms of the number of manual control systems (1, 3 or 5) that needed to be managed during a 100 min session, while task motivation (between-Ss) was defined by instructions (standard vs. enhanced) designed to influence the level of voluntary commitment to task goals. Effort and fatigue were measured by self report, as were perceived demands and anxiety (included as manipulation checks). While both task load and task motivation led to an increase in effort, there was a stronger fatigue response to task load under enhanced task motivation. As predicted, while both perceived demands and anxiety increased with task load, they were not affected by task motivation. An independent assessment of after-effects of fatigue on a fault finding task showed an increased use of low effort strategies under enhanced task motivation. The findings support the hypothesized effort → fatigue linkage. During task performance, fatigue is a consequence not of task demands per se, but of the level of commitment of effort in meeting demands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakker, A. B. (2008). The work-related flow inventory: Construction and initial validation of the WOLF. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 400–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blascovich, J. (2008). Challenge and threat. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 431–445). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40(1), 109–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E. (1979). Is a fatigue test now possible? Ergonomics, 22(12), 1277–1290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1980). After-effects of stress on human performance and social behavior: A review of research and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 82–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, F. (2004). The construct of psychological fatigue: A psychometric and experimental analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hull, Hull, UK.

  • Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Hove: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenhaeuser, M. (1986). A psychobiological framework for research on human stress and coping. In M. H. Appley & R. Trumbull (Eds.), Dynamics of stress: Physiological, psychological and social perspectives. New York, NY: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, A. W. K. (1993). Comparing the concepts of mental load and stress. Ergonomics, 36, 991–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gendolla, G. H. E., & Richter, M. (2010). Effort mobilization when the self is involved: Some lessons from the cardiovascular system. Review of General Psychology, 14(3), 212–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, P. A., & Desmond, P. A. (2001). Stress, workload and fatigue. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J. P., & Stephens, J. M. (1977). Stress, health and the social environment: A sociobiological approach to medicine. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, G. R. J. (1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload. Biological Psychology, 45, 73–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, G. R. J. (2013). The psychology of fatigue: Work, effort and control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, G. R. J., & Earle, F. (2006). Control over the scheduling of simulated office work reduces the impact of workload on mental fatigue and task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 50–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, G. R. J., Nickel, P., Roberts, A. C., & Roberts, M. H. (2009). Sensitivity of candidate markers of psychophysiological strain to cyclical changes in manual control load during simulated process control. Applied Ergonomics, 40, 1011–1018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, G. R. J., Wastell, D. G., & Sauer, J. (1998). Effects of sleep deprivation and user interface on complex performance: A multilevel analysis of compensatory control. Human Factors, 40, 233–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holding, D. H. (1983). Fatigue. In G. R. J. Hockey (Ed.), Stress and fatigue in human performance. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., Schmeichel, B. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2013). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(3), 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. R., Wall, T. D., Martin, R., & Davids, K. (1993). New measures of job control, cognitive demand and production responsibilities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 753–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalsbeek, J. W. H. (1968). Measurement of mental workload and of acceptable load: Possible applications in industry. International Journal of Production Research, 7, 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 637–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B., & Botvinick, M. M. (2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 665–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W., Bélanger, J. J., Chen, X., Köpetz, C., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2012). The energetics of motivated cognition: A force-field analysis. Psychological Review, 119, 1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013). An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 661–726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science, 1, 240–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, K. B. (2008). Effortful control, explicit processing, and the regulation of human evolved predispositions. Psychological Review, 115, 1012–1031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. (2011). Personality and individual differences in cognitive fatigue. In P. L. Ackerman (Ed.), Cognitive fatigue: Multidisciplinary perspectives on current research and future applications. Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. L., & Duncan, K. D. (1988). Strategies and tactics fault diagnosis. Ergonomics, 31(5), 761–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, G. (1986). The concept and measurement of mental effort. In G. R. J. Hockey, A. W. K. Gaillard & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.) Energetics and human information processing (pp. 175–198).

  • Mulert, C., Menzinger, E., Leicht, G., Pogarell, O., & Hegerl, U. (2005). Evidence for a close relationship between conscious effort and anterior cingulate cortex activity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 56, 65–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obrist, P. A. (1976). The cardiovascular–behavioral interaction—As it appears today. Psychophysiology, 13, 95–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 466–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, G. B., & Nygren, T. E. (1988). The subjective workload assessment technique: A scaling procedure for measuring mental workload. Advances in Psychology, 52, 185–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, W. B. (1978). Human problem solving performance in a fault diagnosis task. IEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 8, 258–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarter, M., Gehring, W. J., & Kozak, R. (2006). More attention must be paid: The neurobiology of attentional effort. Brain Research Review, 51(2), 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtke, H. (1976). Vigilance. In E. Simpson & P. C. Weiser (Eds.), Psychological and physiological correlates of work and fatigue (pp. 193–219). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ursin, H., & Eriksen, H. R. (2004). The cognitive activation theory of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 567–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, D., Frese, M., & Meijman, T. F. (2003). Mental fatigue and the control of cognitive processes: Effects on perseveration and planning. Acta Psychologica, 113, 45–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waldstein, S. R., Bachen, E. A., & Manuck, S. B. (1997). Active coping and cardiovascular reactivity: A multiplicity of influences. Psychosomatic Medicine, 59, 620–625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. M., Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). On leaping to conclusions when feeling tired: Mental fatigue effects on impressional primacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(2), 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. A. (2008). Refining the prediction of effort: Brehm’s distinction between potential motivation and motivation intensity. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 682–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. A., Junious, T. R., Neal, C., Avello, A., Graham, C., Herrmann, L., et al. (2007). Mental fatigue influence on effort-related cardiovascular response: Difficulty effects and extension across cognitive performance domains. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors are unaware of any actual or potential conflict of interest with any aspect of the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona Earle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Earle, F., Hockey, B., Earle, K. et al. Separating the effects of task load and task motivation on the effort–fatigue relationship. Motiv Emot 39, 467–476 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9481-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9481-2

Keywords