Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

OM-based video shot retrieval by one-to-one matching

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a new approach for shot-based retrieval by optimal matching (OM), which provides an effective mechanism for the similarity measure and ranking of shots by one-to-one matching. In the proposed approach, a weighted bipartite graph is constructed to model the color similarity between two shots. Then OM based on Kuhn–Munkres algorithm is employed to compute the maximum weight of a constructed bipartite graph as the shot similarity value by one-to-one matching among frames. To improve the speed efficiency of OM, two improved algorithms are also proposed: bipartite graph construction based on subshots and bipartite graph construction based on the same number of keyframes. Besides color similarity, motion feature is also employed for shot similarity measure. A motion histogram is constructed for each shot, the motion similarity between two shots is then measured by the intersection of their motion histograms. Finally, the shot similarity is based on the linear combination of color and motion similarity. Experimental results indicate that the proposed approach achieves better performance than other methods in terms of ranking and retrieval capability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen L, Chua TS (2001) A match and tiling approach to content-based video retrieval. International Conference on Multimedia and Expo

  2. Deng Y, Manjunath BS (1997) Content-based search of video using color, texture and motion. International Conference on Image Processing 534–537

  3. Fan J, Elmagarmid AK, Zhu X, Aref WG, Wu L (2004) Classview: hierarchical video shot classification, indexing, and accessing. IEEE Trans Multimedia 6(1):70–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hauptmann A, Chen M-Y, Christel M et al Confounded expectations: Informedia at TRECVID 2004. http://www-nlpir.nist.gov/projects/tvpubs/ tvpapers04/

  5. Jain AK, Vailaya A, Wei X (1999) Query by video clip. Multimedia Syst 7:369–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lienhart R, Effelsberg W, Jain R (1998) VisualGREP: a systematic method to compare and retrieve video sequences. In: SPIE Conference on Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases. pp 271–282

  7. Lin T, Ngo CW, Zhang HJ et al (2001) Integrating color and spatial features for content-based video retrieval. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP 2001). pp 592–595

  8. Liu X, Zhuang Y, Pan Y (1999) A new approach to retrieve video by example video clip. ACM Multimedia Conference

  9. MPEG video group (1999) Description of Core Experiments for MPEG-7 Color/Texture Descriptions. ISO/MPEGJTC1/SC29/WG11 MPEG98/M2819

  10. Ngo CW, Pong TC, Chin RT (2001) Video partitioning by temporal slice coherency. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 11(8):941–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ngo CW, Pong TC, Zhang HJ (2002) Motion-based video representation for scene change detection. Int J Comput Vis 50(2):127–143 (Nov)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Over P, Kraaij W, Laneva T, Smeaton A, Buckland L TREC 2005 video retrieval evaluation introductions. http://www-nlpir.nist.gov/projects/tvpubs/ tv.pubs.org.html

  13. Peng Y, Ngo CW (2006) Clip-based similarity measure for query-dependent clip retrieval and video summarization. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 16(5):612–627 (May)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schrijver A (2003) Combinatorial optimization: Polyhedra and efficiency, vol A. Springer Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smeaton A, Laneva T TRECVID 2005: Search task. http://www-nlpir.nist.gov/projects/tvpubs/tv.pubs.org.html

  16. Smeaton A, Over P, Arlandis J TRECVID-2004: Search task overview. http://www-nlpir.nist.gov/projects/tvpubs/tv.pubs.org.html

  17. Souvannavong F, Merialdo B, Huet B (2004) Latent semantic analysis for an effective region-based video shot retrieval system. In: The 6th ACM international workshop on multimedia information retrieval. New York, pp 243–250 (October)

  18. Swain MJ, Ballard DH (1991) Color indexing. Int J Comput Vis 7(1):11–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Taskiran C, Chen J-Y, Albiol A, Torres L, Bouman CA, Delp EJ (2004) ViBE: a compressed video database structured for active browsing and search. IEEE Trans Multimedia 6(1):103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu Y, Zhuang Y, Pan Y (2000) Content-based video similarity model. In: ACM Multimedia Conference.

  21. Xiao WS (1993) Graph theory and its algorithms. Aviation Industrial Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yuan J, Duan L-Y, Tian Q, Wu C (2004) Fast and robust short video clip search using an index structure. In: The 6th ACM international workshop on multimedia information retrieval. New York, pp 61–68 (October)

  23. Zhao L, Qi W, Li SZ et al (2000) “Key-frame extraction and shot retrieval using nearest feature line (NFL). In: ACM SIGMM international workshop on multimedia information retrieval.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuxin Peng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peng, Y., Ngo, CW. & Xiao, J. OM-based video shot retrieval by one-to-one matching. Multimed Tools Appl 34, 249–266 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-006-0085-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-006-0085-4

Keywords