Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Enhancing values through virtuality for intelligent artifacts that influence human attitude and behavior

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Embodied interaction technologies allow us to enhance physical artifacts surrounding us by adding an information layer to the artifacts. The information layer that we call virtual forms presents dynamically generated visual information representing virtual objects and creatures that influence human attitude and behavior. The focus of our research is to develop intelligent artifacts enhanced with virtual forms that influence human attitude and behavior. To suggest some ways to develop such artifacts that harmoniously integrate virtual forms into them, based on our experience with three case studies presented in the paper, we propose a value-based analysis framework, which allows us to discuss and consider some good-design implications for the design of the enhanced intelligent artifacts. We also present design implications to apply the value-based analysis framework to analyze and enhance one of intelligent artifact. Finally, our experience suggests that incorporating fictionality is a promising direction for the designing of intelligent artifacts with ideological messages intended to influence people’s attitude and behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.gamesforchange.org/

  2. In this paper, real TCG means that the game is performed using real trading cards on a real table and that two or four players play the game face-to-face.

  3. http://www.geocities.jp/higuchuu4

  4. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/kinectforwindows/

  5. https://github.com/OpenNI/OpenNI

  6. The solution was proposed in AwareMirror [21] for maintaining the balance between ambient abstract imformation and textual concrete information in intelligent daily artifacts.

  7. http://www.artandsciencejournal.com/post/44792197338/technology-meets-fashion-meets-art-the-beautiful

  8. http://www.yugioh-card.com/en/

  9. http://zelda.com/

  10. http://blackrockshooter.wikia.com/

  11. Using fictional stories is now very popular to project a virtual character in the real world. In Japan, for example, a virtual idol sings in a concert and appears in the real world by using a film screen: http://5pb.jp/mikupa/. The approach achieves the effect to live the virtual idol in the real world.

  12. The term was coined by Huizinga [28]. The magic circle is a place of dreams and fantasy. It is an escape from everyday problems and chores. Most importantly, everything inside the magic circle is, in some way, transformative. Each time a person leaves the magic circle, they bring meaning and experience.

  13. The results of positive psychology teach us that positive thinking plays a very important role in increasing our self-efficacy to solve difficult problems [17].

References

  1. Ardenne P., Dunne A. and Antonelli P. (2009) AC/DC: Contemporary Art Contemporary Design, Jrp Ringier.

  2. Arrasvuori, J., Boberg M., Holopainen J., Korhonen H., Lucero A. and Montola M. (2011) Applying the PLEX Framework in Designing for Playfulness, In Proceedings of Designing Pleasurable Product and Interface.

  3. Baudrillard J (1994) Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan Press, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beyer H, Holtzblatt K (1999) Contextual design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bogost I, Ferrari S, Schweizer B (2010) Newsgames: journalism at play. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boztepe S (2007) User value: competing theories and models. Int J Des 1(2):55–63

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cagan C, Vogel J (2002) Creating breakthrough products: innovation from product planning to program approval. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cockton G. (2006) Designing Worth is Worth Designing, In Proceedings of International Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp.165-174

  9. Consolvo S., Everitt K., Smith I. and Landay J.A. (2006) Design Requirements for Technologies that Encourage Physical Activity, In Proceedings of International Conference of Human Factors in Computing Systems.

  10. Dena C. (2009) Transmedia Practice: Theorising the Practice of Expressing a Fictional World across Distinct Media and Environments, Dissertation Thesis, University Sydney

  11. Deterding S., Dixon D., Khaled R. and Nacke L. (2011) From Game Design Elements to Gamefullness: Defining “Gamification”, In Proceedings of Academic Mindtrek Conference.

  12. Djajadiningrat T., Overbeeke K. and Wensween S. (2002) But How, how, Donald, tell us how? On the creation of meaning in interaction design through feedforward and inherent feedback, In Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 285–192.

  13. Dewey J (1987) Art as experience. Southern Illinois University press, Carbondale

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dunne A, Raby F (2013) Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dunne L (2010) Smart clothing in practice: key design barriers to commercialization, fashion practice, 2(1). Berg Publishers, London, pp 41–66

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ehn P (1993) Scandinavian design: on participation and skill. In: Schuler D, Namioka A (eds) Participatory design: principles and practices. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 41–77

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fogg BJ (2002) Persuasive technology: using to change what We think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fredrikson B (2009) Positivity: Top-notch research reveals the 3 to 1 ratio that will change your life. Three Rivers Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Friedman B, Kahn PH, Borning A (2006) Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Zhang P, Galletta D (eds) Human-computer interaction and management information systems: foundations. M.E. Sharpe Inc, New York, pp 348–372

  20. Fuad-Luka A (2009) Design activism—beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fujinami K., Kawsar F. and Nakajima T. (2005) AwareMirror: A personalized display using a mirror, In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Pervasive Computing, pp.137-150.

  22. Fujinami K. and Nakajima T. (2005) Sentient artefacts: Acquiring user’s context through daily objects, In Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 335–344.

  23. Goffman E (1974) Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hakknas L. and Redstrom J. (2001) Slow Technology; Designing for Reflection, Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 5, No. 3.

  25. Hara K (2011) Japanese design—aesthetics makes the future. Iwanami Publisher, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hassenzahl M. and Tractinsky N. (2006) User Experience – a Research Agenda, Behaviour and Information Technology, pp. 91–97

  27. Hekler E., Klasnja P., Froehlich J., and Buman M. (2013) Mind the Theoretical Gap: Interpreting, Using, and Developing Behavioral Theory in HCI Research, In Proceedings of CHI 2013.

  28. Huizinga J (1955) Homo ludens: a study of the play-element in culture. The Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  29. IDEO (2003) IDEO method cards: 51 ways to inspire design. William Stout, Richmond

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ishii H, Ullmer B (1997) Tangible bits: toward seamless interfaces between people, bits, and atoms. In: Proceedings of the international conference on human factors in computer systems, Atlanta. ACM, New York, pp 234–241

    Google Scholar 

  31. Iwata T, Yamabe T, Nakajima T (2011) Augmented reality Go: extending traditional game play with interactive self-learning support, in proceedings of the 17th IEEE conference on embedded and real-tie computing systems ad applications. IEEE, Macao, pp 105–114

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jordan PW (2002) Designing pleasurable products: an introduction to the new human factors. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jull J (2005) Half-real: video games between Rea rules ad fictional worlds. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kahneman D (2012) Thinking, fast and slow. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kim WC, Mauborgne RA (2005) Blue ocean strategy: from theory to practice. Calif Manag Rev 47(3):105–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kawsar F., Fujinami K. and Nakajima T. (2005) Augmenting everyday life with sentient artefacts, In Proceedings of the 2005 joint conference on Smart objects and ambient intelligence: innovative context-aware services: usages and technologies, pp.141-146.

  37. Kawsar F., Nakajima T. and Fujinami K. (2008) Deploy spontaneously: supporting end-users in building and enhancing a smart home, In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, pp. 282–291.

  38. Krippendorff K (2005) The semantic turn: a new foundation for design. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Lehdonvirta V. (2009) Virtual Consumption, Publications of the Turku School of Economics, A-11:2009, http://info.tse.fi/julkaisut/vk/Ae11_2009.pdf.

  40. Lehdonvirta V (2009) Virtual item sales as a revenue model: identifying attributes that drive purchase decisions. Electronic commerce research, Vol.9, No.1. Springer, London, pp 97–113

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lehdonvirta V. and Ernkvist M. (2011) Knowledge Map of the Virtual Economy, Washington DC: World Bank, http://www.infodev.org/en/Document.1056.pdf.

  42. Lockton D, Harrison D, Stanton NA (2010) The design with intent method: a design tool for influencing user behavior. Appl Ergon 41(3):382–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Marzano S, Aarts E (2003) The new everyday view on ambient intelligence. 010 Publisher, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  44. Maslow AH (1970) Motivation and personality. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mattila AS (2000) The role of narratives in the advertising of experiential services. J Serv Res 3(August):35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. McGonigal J (2011) Reality is broken: why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  47. Montola M, Stenros J, Waern A (2009) Pervasive games—theory and design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mori M. (1970) On the Uncanny Valley, Energy, Vol. 7, No.4, pp.33-35 Translated by Karl F. MacDorman and Takashi Minato, Elsevier.

  49. Nakajima T, Lehdonvirta V (2013) Designing motivation in persuasive ambient mirrors. Pers Ubiquit Comput 17(1):107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Petersen M.G., Iversen O.S., Krogh P.G., and Ludvigsen M.M. (2004), Aesthetic Interaction—A Pragmatist’s Aesthetics of Interactive Systems, In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Designing of Interactive Systems, pp.269-276.

  51. Pine BJ, Gilmore JH (1999) The experience economy: work is theater and every business a stage. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  52. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF (1997) The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot: September/October 1997 12(1):38–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Reeves B, Nass C (1998) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ritterfeld U, Cody M, Vorderer P (2009) Serious games: mechanisms and effects. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ruppel M.N. (2012) “Visualizing Transmedia Network: Links, Paths and Peripheries, Dissertation Thesis, University of Maryland.

  56. Ruth M., Schoormans J.P.L. and Schifferstein N.H.J. (2007) Product Attachment: Design Strategies to Stimulate the Emotional Bonding with Products, In Product Experience Hendrik N. J. Schifferstein, Paul Hekkert ed., Elsevier.

  57. Sakamoto M., Alexandrova T. and Nakajima T. (2013) Analyzing the Effects if Virtualizing and Augmenting Trading Card Game based in the Player’s Personality, In Proceedings of The Sixth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions

  58. Sakamoto M., Alexandrova T. and Nakajima T. (2013) Augmenting Remote Trading Card Play with Virtual Characters used in Animation and Game Stories – Toward Persuasive and Ambient Transmedia Storytelling –, In Proceedings of The Sixth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions

  59. Sakamoto M. and Nakajima T. (2013) Micro-Crowdfunding: Achieving a Sustainable Society through Economic and Social Incentives in Micro-Level Crowdfunding, In Proceedings of International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia.

  60. Sakamoto M. and Nakajima T. (2014) The GamiMedia Model: Gamifying Content Culture, In the 6th International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design.

  61. Sakamoto M. and Nakajima T. (2014) Gamifying Intelligent Daily Environments through Introducing Fictionality, International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology, Vol. 7, No. 4.

  62. Sakamoto M. and Nakajima T. (2014), Gamifying Social Media to Encourage Social Activities with Digital-Physical Hybrid Role-Playing, In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media.

  63. Sakamoto M., Nakajima T., and Akioka A. (2014) A Methodology for Gamifying Smart Cities: Navigating Human Behavior and Attitude, In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions

  64. Sakamoto M., Tong T.H., Liu Y., Nakajima T. and Akioka S. (2014), Designing Incentives for Community-based Mobile Crowdsourcing Architecture, In Proceedings of 25th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications.

  65. Sakamoto M., Alexandrova T. and Nakajima T. (2014) Introducing Virtuality to Enhance Game-related Physical Artifacts, International Journal of Smart Home, Vol. 8, No. 2.

  66. Sakamoto M. and Nakajima T. (2014) A Community-based Crowdsourcing Service for Achieving a Sustainable Society through Micro-Level Crowdfunding, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet, Politics, Policy 2014: Crowdsoucing for Politics and Policy.

  67. Schwartz B (2005) The paradox of choice: why more is less. Harper Perennial, New York

    Google Scholar 

  68. Schwarz N, Clore GL (2006) Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In: Higgins ET, Kruglanski AW (eds) Social psychology: handbook of basic principles. Guilford Pr, New York

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sengers P, Gaver B (2006) Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation, in proceedings of 6th international conference on designing interactive systems. ACM, New York, pp 99–108

    Google Scholar 

  70. Fulton SJ (2005) Thoughtless acts? Chronicle Books, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  71. Szulborski D (2005) This is not a game: a guide to alternate reality gaming. Lulu.Com, New York

    Google Scholar 

  72. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2009) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  73. Todd PM (2007) How much information do we need? Eur J Oper Res 177(Elsevier):1417–1332

    Google Scholar 

  74. Yamabe T, Nakajima T (2013) Playful training with augmented reality games: case studies toward reality-oriented system design. Multimedia Tools Appl 62(1):259–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wright P, McCarthy J (2010) Experience-centered design. Morgan & Claypoll Punlisher, San Rafael

    Google Scholar 

  76. Zuckerman O. and Gal-Oz A. (2014) Deconstructing Gamification: Evaluating the effectiveness of Continuous Measurement, Virtual Rewards, and Social Comparison for Promoting Physical Activates, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 18, No. 6.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 169-8555, Japan

    Mizuki Sakamoto, Tatsuo Nakajima & Todorka Alexandrova

Authors
  1. Mizuki Sakamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tatsuo Nakajima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Todorka Alexandrova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatsuo Nakajima.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakamoto, M., Nakajima, T. & Alexandrova, T. Enhancing values through virtuality for intelligent artifacts that influence human attitude and behavior. Multimed Tools Appl 74, 11537–11568 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-014-2250-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-014-2250-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation