Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

An efficient image integration algorithm for night mode vision applications

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The night mode visible images are often fused with infrared images for increased visual perception and contextual enhancement as the later is equipped with the complimentary information which is otherwise missing due to night mode image acquisition. This technology finds extensive application in the field of armed forces and surveillance. The night mode visible images, due to under-exposure and poor atmospheric conditions are prone to noise and artefacts which leads deterred level of information analysis and extraction. This article not only provides higher visual perception of the individual source images but also proposes an efficient fusion algorithm for visible and infrared images in night mode which is able to generate high quality results with increased focus on the objects of interest competitive with the state-of-the-art methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arunkumar N, Ramkumar K, Venkatraman V, Abdulhay E, Fernandes SL, Kadry S, Segal S (2017) Classification of focal and non focal EEG using entropies. Pattern Recogn Lett 94:112–117

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bavirisetti DP, Dhuli R (2016) Multi-focus image fusion using multi-scale image decomposition and saliency detection. Ain Shams Eng J

  3. Bavirisetti DP, Dhuli R (2016) Two-scale image fusion of visible and infrared images using saliency detection. Infrared Phys Technol 76:52–64

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burt PJ, Adelson EH (1987) The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. In Read Comput Vis 671–679

  5. Dippel S, Stahl M, Wiemker R, Blaffert T (2002) Multiscale contrast enhancement for radiographies: Laplacian pyramid versus fast wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21(4):343–353

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dogra A, Goyal B, Agrawal S (2017) From multi-scale decomposition to non-multi-scale decomposition methods: a comprehensive survey of image fusion techniques and its applications. IEEE Access 5:16040–16067

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dogra A, Goyal B, Agrawal S. (2018) Osseous and digital subtraction angiography image fusion via various enhancement schemes and Laplacian pyramid transformations. Futur Gen Comput Syst

  8. Fernandes SL, Gurupur VP, Lin H, Martis RJ (2017) A novel fusion approach for early lung Cancer detection using computer aided diagnosis techniques. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics. 7(8):1841–1850

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gonzalez Rafael C, Woods Richard E, Eddins SL (2004) Digital image processing using MATLAB. Editorial Pearson-Prentice Hall, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jin X, Jiang Q, Yao S, Zhou D, Nie R, Hai J, He K (2017) A survey of infrared and visual image fusion methods. Infrared Phys Technol 85:478–501

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khan MW, Sharif M, Yasmin M (2016) Fernandes SL. A new approach of cup to disk ratio based glaucoma detection using fundus images. J Integr Des Process Sci 20(1):77–94

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar BS (2015) Image fusion based on pixel significance using cross bilateral filter. SIViP 9(5):1193–1204

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li S, Kang X (2013) Hu J. Image fusion with guided filtering. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(7):2864–2875

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li X, Qin SY (2011) Efficient fusion for infrared and visible images based on compressive sensing principle. IET Image Process 5(2):141–147

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li H, Manjunath BS, Mitra SK (1995) Multisensor image fusion using the wavelet transform. Graph Models Image Proc 57(3):235–232

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li S, Kang X, Fang L, Hu J, Yin H (2017) Pixel-level image fusion: a survey of the state of the art. Inform Fus 33:100–112

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu Y, Chen X, Ward RK, Wang ZJ (2016) Image fusion with convolutional sparse representation. IEEE Sign Proc Lett 23(12):1882–1886

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ma J, Chen C, Li C, Huang J (2016) Infrared and visible image fusion via gradient transfer and total variation minimization. Inform Fus 31:100–109

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ma J, Ma Y, Li C (2018) Infrared and visible image fusion methods and applications: A survey. Inform Fus

  20. Naidu VP (2011) Image fusion technique using multi-resolution singular value decomposition. Def Sci J 61(5):479

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Perona P, Shiota T, Malik J (1994) Anisotropic diffusion. InGeometry-driven diffusion in computer vision (73–92). Springer, Dordrecht

  22. Raja N, Rajinikanth V, Fernandes SL, Satapathy SC (2017) Segmentation of breast thermal images using Kapur's entropy and hidden Markov random field. J Med Imaging Health Inform 7(8):1825–1829

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rajinikanth V, Satapathy SC, Fernandes SL, Nachiappan S (2017) Entropy based segmentation of tumor from brain MR images–a study with teaching learning based optimization. Pattern Recogn Lett 94:87–95

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rajinikanth V, Madhavaraja N, Satapathy SC, Fernandes SL (2017) Otsu's multi-thresholding and active contour snake model to segment Dermoscopy images. J Med Imaging Health Inform 7(8):1837–1840

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rajinikanth V, Satapathy SC, Dey N, Vijayarajan R (2018) DWT-PCA image fusion technique to improve segmentation accuracy in brain tumor analysis. InMicroelectronics, electromagnetics and telecommunications. Springer, Singapore, pp 453–462

    Google Scholar 

  26. Saeedi J, Faez K (2012) Infrared and visible image fusion using fuzzy logic and population-based optimization. Appl Soft Comput 12(3):1041–1054

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shah JH, Sharif M, Yasmin M, Fernandes SL (2017) Facial expressions classification and false label reduction using LDA and threefold SVM. Pattern Recognition Letters

  28. Toet A (1989) Image fusion by a ratio of low-pass pyramid. Pattern Recogn Lett 9(4):245–253

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Torabi A, Massé G, Bilodeau GA (2012) An iterative integrated framework for thermal–visible image registration, sensor fusion, and people tracking for video surveillance applications. Comput Vis Image Underst 116(2):210–221

    Google Scholar 

  30. Treece G (2016) The bitonic filter: linear filtering in an edge-preserving morphological framework. IEEE Trans Image Process 25(11):5199–5211

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang W, Chang F (2011) A multi-focus image fusion method based on laplacian pyramid. JCP 6(12):2559–2566

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang D, Li Z, Cao L, Balas VE, Dey N, Ashour AS, McCauley P, Dimitra SP, Shi F (2017) Image fusion incorporating parameter estimation optimized Gaussian mixture model and fuzzy weighted evaluation system: a case study in time-series plantar pressure data set. IEEE Sensors J 17(5):1407–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Waxman AM, Gove AN, Fay DA, Racamato JP, Carrick JE, Seibert MC, Savoye ED (1997) Color night vision: opponent processing in the fusion of visible and IR imagery. Neural Netw 10(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  34. Xydeas CS (2000) And, and V. Petrovic. "objective image fusion performance measure.". Electron Lett 36(4):308–309

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yasmin M, Sharif M, Irum I, Mehmood W, Fernandes SL (2016) Combining multiple color and shape features for image retrieval. IIOAB J 7(32):97–110

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zeeuw P (1998) Wavelets and image fusion. CWI, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayush Dogra.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 6
figure 6

(a) CSR fusion result, (b) ROLP based fusion, (c) SDMF fusion method, (d) M-SVD fusion rule, (e) Two-scale decomposition image fusion method, (f) Guided Filtering, (g) Wavelet based fusion rule, (h) Gradient transfer fusion rule, (i) proposed method

Table 3 Objective evaluation

In the results given above, the proposed algorithm is performing subjectively at par with CSR method. But in the results given in Fig. 5, our method performs the best. So it can be concluded that performance of the given algorithm remains consistent with the change in the data set.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dogra, A., Kadry, S., Goyal, B. et al. An efficient image integration algorithm for night mode vision applications. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 10995–11012 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6631-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6631-z

Keywords