Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Improved PSO based clustering fusion algorithm for multimedia image data projection

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aiming at the problem that the existing multimedia image clustering fusion algorithm has poor effect on the projection processing of multimedia image data, and the result of the fusion is dispersive, a multimedia image data projection clustering fusion optimization algorithm based on improved particle swarm optimization is proposed. Firstly, using the gradient descent training of error back propagation, the cluster members of the multimedia image data projection are selected to provide an accurate data basis for subsequent cluster fusion. Secondly, each multimedia image data projection base clustering algorithm is selected into the optimized base. Probability of subsets of classes; finally, the improved inertia weight linear decrement PSO algorithm is used for global optimization, and the optimization of multimedia image data projection clustering algorithm is realized. Through experimental verification and analysis, the results show that the algorithm proposed in this paper has high accuracy of projection and clustering of multimedia image data on Data-Set virtual dataset or Iris actual dataset, and the average accuracy is above 90%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cai H, Chen G, Liu G et al (2016) Image fusion method based on bound-constrained optimal projection gradient for NMF in TINST domain[J]. Journal of Jilin University 54(5):1087–1095

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cai-Hong M U, Huo LL, Liu Y et al (2015) Change detection for remote sensing images based on wavelet fusion and PCA-kernel fuzzy clustering[J]. Acta Electron Sin 43(7):1375–1381

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Y, Wang L, Li F et al (2017) Air quality data clustering using EPLS method ☆[J]. Information Fusion 36:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Da K, Yun S, Park H (2015) SymNMF: nonnegative low-rank approximation of a similarity matrix for graph clustering[J]. J Glob Optim 62(3):1–30

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Du L (2014) Infrared and visible image fusion based on random projection and sparse representation[J]. Int J Remote Sens 35(5):1640–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fu Y, Rui W, Jin Y, et al. (2015) Fast image fusion based on alternating direction algorithms[C]// International Conference on Signal Processing

  7. Gianoli C, Fattori G, Riboldi M, et al. (2016) Projection-based deformable registration for tomographic imaging in ion beam therapy[C]// Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference

  8. Hou S, Sun Q (2014) An orthogonal regularized CCA learning algorithm for feature fusion[J]. Journal of Visual Communication & Image Representation 25(5):785–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hou B, Qian W, Zheng Y et al (2014) Unsupervised change detection in SAR image based on gauss-log ratio image fusion and compressed projection[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations & Remote Sensing 7(8):3297–3317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Knyaz VA, Vygolov OV, Vizilter YV, et al. (2016) Multispectral image fusion based on diffusion morphology for enhanced vision applications[C]// Spie Defense + Security

  11. Le MT, Chen LC, Lin CJ (2017) Reconstruction of accurate 3-D surfaces with sharp edges using digital structured light projection and multi-dimensional image fusion[J]. Optics & Lasers in Engineering 96:17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lian C, Ruan S, Denoeux T et al (2019) Joint tumor segmentation in PET-CT images using co-clustering and fusion based on belief functions[J]. IEEE Trans Image Process 28(2):755–766

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Liang G, Shivakumara P, Lu T et al (2015) Multi-spectral fusion based approach for arbitrarily oriented scene text detection in video images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing A Publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society 24(11):4488–4501

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma K, Yeganeh H, Zeng K et al (2015) High dynamic range image compression by optimizing tone mapped image quality index[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing A Publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society 24(10):3086–3097

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Mariesainte SL, Hamdi K (2016) Projection Pursuit algorithm for virtual machine clustering for monitoring purposes[C]// International Conference on Industrial Informatics & Computer Systems

  16. Meng L, Tan AH, Xu D (2014) Semi-supervised heterogeneous fusion for multimedia data co-clustering[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge & Data Engineering 26(9):2293–2306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Min L, Zhou L. (2016) A novel fast back projection algorithm based on subaperture frequency spectrum fusion in Cartesian coordinates[C]// Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium

  18. Ni J, Xu Q, Zhang G, et al. (2017) Research on Image Fusion Algorithm Based on Fuzzy Clustering and Semantics[C]// IEEE International Conference on Smart Cloud

  19. Ogata Y, Nakahara T, Ode K et al (2017) 3D SPECT/CT fusion using image data projection of bone SPECT onto 3D volume-rendered CT images: feasibility and clinical impact in the diagnosis of bone metastasis[J]. Ann Nucl Med 31(4):304–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ozay M, Vural FTY, Kulkarni SR, et al. (2014) Fusion of image segmentation algorithms using consensus clustering[C]// IEEE International Conference on Image Processing

  21. Prasad S, Hao W, Fowler JE (2014) Compressive data fusion for multi-sensor image analysis[C]// IEEE International Conference on Image Processing

  22. Sevillano X (2014) A one-shot domain-independent robust multimedia clustering methodology based on hybrid multimodal fusion[J]. Multimedia Tools & Applications 73(3):1507–1543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shabanzade F, Ghassemian H (2017) Multimodal image fusion via sparse representation and clustering-based dictionary learning algorithm in NonSubsampled Contourlet domain[C]// International Symposium on Telecommunications

  24. Shen H, Zhao Y, Ma D, et al. (2014) Query dependent multiview features fusion for effective medical image retrieval[C]// Proceedings 2014 IEEE International Conference on Security, Pattern Analysis, and Cybernetics (SPAC)

  25. Stieglitz LH, Ayer C, Schindler K et al (2014) Improved localization of implanted subdural electrode contacts on magnetic resonance imaging with an elastic image fusion algorithm in an invasive electroencephalography recording[J]. Neurosurgery 10(Suppl 4):506–513

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang HL, Zhu M (2015) A fusion algorithm of clustering and geometric features for multiclass man-made objects detection in remote sensing images[J]. Journal of Optoelectronics·laser 26(5):992–999

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang S, Zhuang F, Jiang S et al (2015) Cluster-sensitive structured correlation analysis for web cross-modal retrieval[J]. Neurocomputing 168:747–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiong F, Kam M, Hrebien L et al (2016) Kernelized information-theoretic metric learning for Cancer diagnosis using high-dimensional molecular profiling data[J]. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 10(4):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yadav M. (2014) Review of Image Classification Techniques Based on LDA, PCA and Genetic Algorithm[J]. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 3(2)

  30. Zhang Q, Maldague X (2015) An infrared-visible image fusion scheme based on NSCT and compressed sensing[C]// Signal Processing, Sensor/information Fusion, & Target Recognition XXIV

  31. Zhang H, Ren L, Kong V et al (2015) WE-EF-207-08: improve cone beam CT using a synchronized moving grid, an inter-projection sensor fusion and a probability Total variation reconstruction[J]. Med Phys 42(6Part39):3682–3682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao M, Wu ZJ, Hui L (2017) Random projection data perturbation based privacy protection in WSNs[C]// Computer Communications Workshops

  33. Zhe X, Li G, Wang S, et al. (2015) GOMES: A group-aware multi-view fusion approach towards real-world image clustering[C]// IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo

  34. Zou G. (2016) Ant Colony Clustering Algorithm and Improved Markov Random Fusion Algorithm in Image Segmentation of Brain Images[J]. International Journal Bioautomation

  35. Zuo SS, Yang ZM, Sun GC et al (2015) Geometric correction based fast factorized Back projection algorithm for spotlight SAR imaging[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology 37(6):1389–1394

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No.61370103,61762020) and the teaching quality project in Guizhou (No.20161113006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Software Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China

    Feng Pan

  2. School of Data Science & Information Engineering, Guizhou Minzu University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China

    Feng Pan & Deqiang Chen

  3. School of Computer Science & Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China

    Lu Lu

Authors
  1. Feng Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deqiang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lu Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Pan.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, F., Chen, D. & Lu, L. Improved PSO based clustering fusion algorithm for multimedia image data projection. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 9509–9522 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08015-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08015-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation