Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Natural disasters management using social internet of things

  • 1174: Futuristic Trends and Innovations in Multimedia Systems Using Big Data, IoT and Cloud Technologies (FTIMS)
  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural disasters are very unexpected in human life. The best prevention from such natural disasters is an early warning system which gives a good period to take some necessary measures during the occurrence of disasters. Social media is the best medium to broadcast ominous massages and this can be done by integrating the internet of things with Social Networks. This paper proposes pre-identification of communities that may expose to natural disasters and identification of the best node where the broadcasting system can be placed. A smart broadcasting device that includes a Programmable IoT board like Raspberry Pi or Jetson Nano can be placed at a node with high centrality. The proposed work is very useful to prevent human causality by issuing early warnings of natural disasters like rain flooding, the collapse of old buildings, old bridges, earthquakes, land sliding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albino V, Berardi U, Dangelico RM (2015) Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J Urban Technol 22(1):3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali M, Khan SU, Vasilakos AV (2015) Security in cloud computing: opportunities and challenges. Inf Sci 305:357–383

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2014) From “smart objects” to “social objects”: The next evolutionary step of the internet of things. IEEE Commun Mag 52(1):97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baham C, Hirschheim R, Calderon AA, Kisekka V (2017) An agile methodology for the disaster recovery of information systems under catastrophic scenarios. J Manag Inf Syst 34(3):633–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Birregah B, Top T, Perez C, Châtelet E, Matta N, Lemercier M, Snoussi H (2012) Multi-layer crisis mapping: a social media-based approach. In: 2012 IEEE 21st international workshop on enabling technologies: infrastructure for collaborative enterprises. IEEE, pp 379–384

  6. Braddock RD (2003) Sensitivity analysis of the tsunami warning potential. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 79(2):225–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Challagidad PS, Reshmi VS, Birje MN (2017) Reputation based trust model in cloud computing. Internet Things Cloud Comput 5(5–1):5–12

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chiregi M, Navimipour NJ (2018) Cloud computing and trust evaluation: A systematic literature review of the state-of-the-art mechanisms. J Electric Syst Inform Technol 5(3):608–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fan WJ, Yang SL, Perros H, Pei J (2015) A multi-dimensional trust-aware cloud service selection mechanism based on evidential reasoning approach. Int J Autom Comput 12(2):208–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher D, Hagon K, Lattimer C, O’Callaghan S, Swithern S, Walmsley L (2018) Executive summary world disasters report: leaving no one behind. Int Fed Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland, Tech Rep. https://media.ifrc.org/ifrc/wpcontent/uploads/sites/5/2018/10/B-WDR-2018-EXECSUM-EN.pdf.

  11. Gonzalez AJ, Nencioni G, Helvik BE, Kamisinski A (2016) A fault-tolerant and consistent SDN controller. In 2016 IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM). IEEE, pp 1–6

  12. Habib SM, Ries S, Muhlhauser M (2011) Towards a trust management system for cloud computing. In: 2011 IEEE 10th international conference on trust, security and privacy in computing and communications. IEEE, pp 933–939

  13. Hanka W, Saul J, Weber B, Becker J, Harjadi P, Rudloff A, Clinton J (2010) Real-time earthquake monitoring for tsunami warning in the Indian Ocean and beyond. Nat Hazard. https://doi.org/10.5194/NHESS-10-2611-2010

  14. Haworth B, Bruce E (2015) A review of volunteered geographic information for disaster management. Geogr Compass 9(5):237–250

  15. Huang J, Nicol DM (2013) Trust mechanisms for cloud computing. J Cloud Comput 2(1):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin D, Lin J (2011) Managing tsunamis through early warning systems: a multidisciplinary approach. Ocean Coast Manag 54(2):189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kapucu N (2006) Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners in multiagency coordination. Am Rev Public Admin 36(2):207–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khajehei K (2017) Trust models in cloud computing: a review. Int J Wirel Microwav Technol 4:14–27

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ko RK, Jagadpramana P, Mowbray M, Pearson S, Kirchberg M, Liang Q, Lee BS (2011) TrustCloud: a framework for accountability and trust in cloud computing. In: 2011 IEEE world congress on services. IEEE, pp 584–588

  20. Lansing J, Sunyaev A (2016) Trust in cloud computing: conceptual typology and trust-building antecedents. ACM SIGMIS Database 47(2):58–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mijumbi R, Serrat J, Gorricho JL, Bouten N, De Turck F, Boutaba R (2015) Network function virtualization: state-of-the-art and research challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 18(1):236–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohammadi M, Al-Fuqaha A, Sorour S, Guizani M (2018) Deep learning for IoT big data and streaming analytics: a survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 20(4):2923–2960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mouradian C, Jahromi NT, Glitho RH (2018) NFV and SDN-based distributed IoT gateway for large-scale disaster management. IEEE Internet Things J 5(5):4119–4131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pandey P, Litoriya R (2019) Elderly care through unusual behavior detection: a disaster management approach using IoT and intelligence. IBM J Res Dev 64(1/2):15–21

    Google Scholar 

  25. Poslad S, Middleton SE, Chaves F, Tao R, Necmioglu O, Bügel U (2015) A semantic IoT early warning system for natural environment crisis management. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput 3(2):246–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shah SA, Seker DZ, Rathore MM, Hameed S, Yahia SB, Draheim D (2019) Towards disaster resilient smart cities: can internet of things and big data analytics be the game changers? IEEE Access 7:91885–91903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shah SA, Seker DZ, Hameed S, Draheim D (2019) The rising role of big data analytics and IoT in disaster management: recent advances, taxonomy and prospects. IEEE Access 7:54595–54614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shaikh R, Sasikumar M (2015) Trust model for measuring security strength of cloud computing service. Proc Comput Sci 45:380–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Silva BN, Khan M, Han K (2018) Towards sustainable smart cities: a review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustain Cities Soc 38:697–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sun D, Chang G, Sun L, Wang X (2011) Surveying and analyzing security, privacy and trust issues in cloud computing environments. Proc Eng 15:2852–2856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Takabi H, Joshi JB, Ahn GJ (2010) Securecloud: towards a comprehensive security framework for cloud computing environments. In 2010 IEEE 34th annual computer software and applications conference workshops. IEEE, pp 393–398

  32. Tang M, Dai X, Liu J, Chen J (2017) Towards a trust evaluation middleware for cloud service selection. Futur Gener Comput Syst 74:302–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tekeli-Yeşil S (2006) Public health and natural disasters: disaster preparedness and response in health systems. J Public Health 14(5):317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wiltshire A (2006) Developing early warning systems: a checklist. In: Proc 3rd Int Conf Early Warning (EWC), pp 27–19

  35. Wisner B (2016) Vulnerability as concept, model, metric, and tool. Nat Hazard Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wisner B, Gaillard JC, Kelman I (eds) (2012) Handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  37. Xia W, Zhao P, Wen Y, Xie H (2016) A survey on data center networking (DCN): infrastructure and operations. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 19(1):640–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zakaria SAS, Azimi MA, Majid TA (2014) Exploring the issues of information and communication technology (ICT) application in disaster risk management: a case study of 2014 major flood event in Kelantan

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jaypee University of Information Technology, Waknaghat, India

    Abhilasha Rangra & Vivek Kumar Sehgal

Authors
  1. Abhilasha Rangra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vivek Kumar Sehgal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivek Kumar Sehgal.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rangra, A., Sehgal, V.K. Natural disasters management using social internet of things. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 34447–34461 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11486-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11486-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation