Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Deep Metallogenic prediction model construction of the Xiongcun no. II orebody based on the DNN algorithm

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the continuous mining and gradual reduction of shallow deposits, deep prospecting has become a new global prospecting trend. In addition, with the development of artificial intelligence, deep learning provides a favorable means for geological big data analysis. This paper, researches the No. II Orebody of the Xiongcun deposit. First, based on previous research results and metallogenic regularity, prospecting information, namely, lithology, Au-Ag-Cu chemical elements and wall rock alteration is extracted, and the block model is established by combining the Kriging interpolation structure. Second, the datasets are divided into dataset I and dataset II according to “randomness” and “depth”. Third, deep prospecting prediction models based on deep neural networks (DNN) and the convolutional neural networks (CNN) is constructed, and the model parameters are optimized. Finally, the models are applied to the deep prediction of the Xiongcun No. II Orebody. The results show that the accuracy rate and recall rate of the prediction model based on the DNN algorithm are 96.15% and 89.23%, respectively, and the AUC is 96.39%, which are higher values than those of the CNN algorithm, indicating that the performance of the prediction model based on the DNN algorithm is better. The accuracy of prediction model based on dataset I is higher than that of dataset II. The accuracy of deep metallogenic prediction based on the DNN algorithm is approximately 89%, that based on the CNN is approximately 87%, and that based on prospecting information method is approximately 61.27%. The prediction results of the DNN algorithm are relatively consistent in the spatial location and scale of the orebody. Therefore, based on the work done in this paper, it is feasible to use a deep learning method to carry out deep mineral prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amit SNKB, Aoki Y (2017). Disaster detection from aerial imagery with convolutional neural network. International electronics symposium on knowledge creation and intelligent computing, 239-245

  2. Bang C (2002). The application of PROSEPECTING - information contents in METALLOGENIC prognosis at TONGSHAN copper deposit. Geology and Prospecting

  3. Bianco S, Buzzelli M, Mazzini D, Schettini R (2017) Deep learning for logo recognition. Neurocomputing 245:23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown WM, Gedeon TD, Groves D, Barnes RG (2000) Artificial neural networks: a new method for mineral prospectivity mapping. Aust J Earth Sci 47(4):757–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carranza EJM, Laborte AG (2015) Random forest predictive modeling of mineral prospectivity with small number of prospects and data with missing values in Abra (Philippines). Comput Geosci 74:60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Y (2015) Mineral potential mapping with a restricted Boltzmann machine. Ore Geol Rev 71:749–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng Q (2012) Singularity theory and methods for mapping geochemical anomalies caused by buried sources and for predicting undiscovered mineral deposits in covered areas. J Geochem Explor 122:55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deng H, Zheng Y, Wei YF, Mao XC (2020) Deep learning-based 3D prediction model for the Dayingezhuang gold deposit, Shandong Province(article). Acta Geosci Sin 02:157–165 (in chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fallara F, Legault M, Rabeau O (2006) 3-D integrated geological modeling in the Abitibi subprovince (Québec, Canada): techniques and applications. Explor Min Geol 15:27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fan Y, Qian Y, Soong FK, He L (2015). Multi-speaker modeling and speaker adaptation for DNN-based TTS synthesis. In 2015 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), 4475–4479

  11. Gao Y, Zhang Z, Xiong Y, Zuo R (2016) Mapping mineral prospectivity for cu polymetallic mineralization in Southwest Fujian Province, China. Ore Geol Rev 75:16–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guang ZR (2019). Deep learning-based mining and integration of deep-level mineralization information. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry

  13. Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR (2006) Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313(5786):504–507

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu W, Fu M, Pan W (2016). Primi speech recognition based on deep neural network. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems. IEEE

  15. Imamverdiyev Y, Sukhostat L (2019) Lithological facies classification using deep convolutional neural network. J Pet Sci Eng 174:216–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Keiller N, Fadel SG, Dourado IC, Rafael DOW, Munoz JAV, Penatti OAB et al. (2017). Exploiting convnet diversity for flooding identification. IEEE Geoscience & Remote Sensing Letters

  17. Khare N, Devan P, Chowdhary CL, Bhattacharya S, Singh G, Singh S, Yoon B (2020) SMO-DNN: spider monkey optimization and deep neural network hybrid classifier model for intrusion detection. Electronics 9(4):692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim S, Kojima M, Toh K-C (2016) A Lagrangian---DNN relaxation: a fast method for computing tight lower bounds for a class of quadratic optimization problems. Math Program 156(1):161–187

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kingma DP, Ba JL (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In ICLR 2015 : International Conference on Learning Representations 2015

  20. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2017) ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM 60(6):84–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lake BM, Salakhutdinov R, Tenenbaum JB (2015) Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction. Science 350(6266):1332–1338

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Lang X, Tang J, Li Z, Huang Y, Ding F, Yang H, Xie F, Zhang L, Wang Q, Zhou Y (2014) U–Pb and re–Os geochronological evidence for the Jurassic porphyry metallogenic event of the Xiongcun district in the Gangdese porphyry copper belt, southern Tibet, PRC. J Asian Earth Sci 79:608–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lecun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015). Deep learning, 521(7553), 436

  24. Leite EP, de Filho CRS (2009) Artificial neural networks applied to mineral potential mapping for copper-gold mineralizations in the Carajas Mineral Province, Brazil. Geophys Prospect 57(6):1049–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li Y, Cheng X, Gui G (2018) Co-robust-ADMM-net: joint ADMM framework and DNN for robust sparse composite regularization. IEEE Access 6:47943–47952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li, W., Chen, J. P., ;Jia, Y. L., Zhou, G. Y., Mao, X. C., & Xiao, K. Y. (2020). Three-dimensional modeling and comprehensive Metallogenic prediction of the Zaozigou gold deposit, Gansu Province Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 144–156. (in chinese)

  27. Lou DB, Zhang CQ, Shan CD, Liu H (2019) Role of regional geochemical survey for Ge mineral prediction in Chuan-Dian-Qian Pb-Zn (Ge) metallogenic region. Acta Petrol Sin 11:3407–3428 (in chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maas AL, Qi P, Xie Z, Hannun AY, Lengerich CT, Jurafsky D, Ng AY (2017) Building dnn acoustic models for large vocabulary speech recognition. Comput Speech Lang 41:195–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Martin L, Perron G, Masson M (2007). Discovery from 3D visualization and quantitative modelling. Proceedings of exploration 07: fifth decennial international conference on mineral exploration, 543–550

  30. Maskey M, Ramachandran R, Miller J (2017) Deep learning for phenomena-based classification of earth science images. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 11(4):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pan M, Li J, Wang Z, Jin J (2009) Application of 3-D geoscience modeling Technology for the Estimation of solid mineral reserves. Acta Geologica Sinica-English Edition 83(3):655–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pan Y, Peng GX, Pan LY, Zhang JD (2018). Three-dimensional positioning metallogenic prediction method and system for concealed orebody. (in chinese)

  33. Porwal A, González-Álvarez I, Markwitz V, McCuaig TC, Mamuse A (2010) Weights-of-evidence and logistic regression modeling of magmatic nickel sulfide prospectivity in the Yilgarn craton, Western Australia. Ore Geol Rev 38(3):184–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Priya RMS, Maddikunta PKR, Parimala M, Koppu S, Gadekallu TR, Chowdhary CL, Alazab M (2020) An effective feature engineering for DNN using hybrid PCA-GWO for intrusion detection in IoMT architecture. Comput Commun 160:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ravuri S (2015). Hybrid DNN-latent structured SVM acoustic models for continuous speech recognition. In 2015 IEEE workshop on automatic speech recognition and understanding (ASRU), 37–44

  36. Ross ZE, Meier M-A, Hauksson E (2018) P-wave arrival picking and first-motion polarity determination with deep learning. J Geophys Res 123(6):5120–5129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Saljoughi BS, Hezarkhani A (2018) A comparative analysis of artificial neural network (ANN), wavelet neural network (WNN), and support vector machine (SVM) data-driven models to mineral potential mapping for copper mineralizations in the Shahr-e-Babak region, Kerman, Iran. Applied Geomatics 10(3):229–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schmidhuber, Jürgen (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw 61:85–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Singer DA, Kouda R (1996) Application of a feedforward neural network in the search for Kuroko deposits in the Hokuroku district, Japan. Math Geosci 28(8):1017–1023

    Google Scholar 

  40. Somayaji SRK, Alazab M, Mk M, Bucchiarone A, Chowdhary CL, Gadekallu TR (2020). A framework for prediction and storage of battery life in IoT devices using DNN and Blockchain. In 2020 IEEE Globecom workshops (GC Wkshps)

  41. Sprague K, Kemp ED, Wong W, Mcgaughey J, Perron G, Barrie T (2006) Spatial targeting using queries in a 3-d gis environment with application to mineral exploration. Comput Geosci 32(3):396–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sun T, Li H, Wu K, Chen F, Hu Z (2020) Data-driven predictive modelling of mineral prospectivity using machine learning and deep learning methods: a case study from southern Jiangxi province, China. Minerals 10(2):102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tang J, Lang X, Xie F, Gao Y, Li Z, Huang Y, … Wang Q (2015) Geological characteristics and genesis of the Jurassic no. I porphyry cu–au deposit in the Xiongcun district, Gangdese porphyry copper belt, Tibet. Ore Geol Rev 70:438–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang G, Zhang S, Yan C, Song Y, Sun Y, Li D, Xu F (2011) Mineral potential targeting and resource assessment based on 3D geological modeling in Luanchuan region, China. Comput Geosci 37(12):1976–1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang DH, Liu XX, Liu LJ (2015) Characteristics of geological big data and its application in the study of metallogenic regularity and metallogenic series. Mineral Deposits 34(6):1143–1154 (in chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wang L, Dai L, Li L, Liang T (2018) Multivariable cokriging prediction and source analysis of potentially toxic elements (cr, cu, cd, pb, and zn) in surface sediments from dongting lake, China. Ecological Indicators 94P1(NOV):312–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang T, Qiao Y, Ding W, Mao W, Zhou Y, Gong H (2019) Improved fragment sampling for ab initio protein structure prediction using deep neural networks. Nature Machine Intelligence 1:347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Xiao-Lei Z, Ji W (2013) Deep belief networks based voice activity detection. IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech & Language Processing 21(4):697–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Xie F, Tang J, Chen Y, Lang X (2018) Apatite and zircon geochemistry of Jurassic porphyries in the Xiongcun district, southern Gangdese porphyry copper belt: implications for petrogenesis and mineralization. Ore Geol Rev 96:98–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Xiong Y, Zuo R, Carranza EJM (2018) Mapping mineral prospectivity through big data analytics and a deep learning algorithm. Ore Geol Rev 102:811–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Xu Y, Du J, Dai L-R, Lee C-H (2014) An experimental study on speech enhancement based on deep neural networks. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 21(1):65–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yousefi, Mahyar (2017) Analysis of zoning pattern of geochemical indicators for targeting of porphyry-cu mineralization: a pixel-based mapping approach. Nat Resour Res 26:429–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yu H, Tan Z-H, Ma Z, Martin R, Guo J (2018) Spoofing detection in automatic speaker verification systems using DNN classifiers and dynamic acoustic features. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 29(10):4633–4644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zeng G, Chen Y, Cui B, Yu S (2019) Continual learning of context-dependent processing in neural networks. Nature Machine Intelligence 1:364–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang Z, Zuo R, Xiong Y (2016) A comparative study of fuzzy weights of evidence and random forests for mapping mineral prospectivity for skarn-type Fe deposits in the southwestern Fujian metallogenic belt, China. Science China-Earth Sciences 59(3):556–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zuo R (2017) Machine learning of mineralization-related geochemical anomalies: a review of potential methods. Nat Resour Res 26(4):457–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zuo RG (2019). Mining and integration of deep-level mineralization information based on deep learning. Bull Mineral Petrol Geochem (1). (in chinese)

  58. Zuo R, Carranza EJM (2011) Support vector machine: a tool for mapping mineral prospectivity. Comput Geosci 37(12):1967–1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zuo R, Xiong Y (2018) Big data analytics of identifying geochemical anomalies supported by machine learning methods. Nat Resour Res 27(1):5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Zuo R, Xiong Y, Wang J, Carranza EJM (2019a) Deep learning and its application in geochemical mapping. Earth Sci Rev 192:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zuo RG, Peng Y, Li T, Xiong YH (2021) Challenges of geological prospecting big data mining and integration based on deep learning. J China Univ Geosci 46(1):350 (in chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0604105); National Natural Science Foundation of China (42072322); Chengdu University of Technology Development Funding Program for Young and Middle-aged Key Teachers (10912-JXGG2020-06251).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, China

    Di Zhang, Zhongli Zhou, Suyue Han, Hao Gong, Tianyi Zou & Jie Luo

  2. Geomathematics Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, China

    Zhongli Zhou & Suyue Han

Authors
  1. Di Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhongli Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Suyue Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hao Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tianyi Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jie Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongli Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, D., Zhou, Z., Han, S. et al. Deep Metallogenic prediction model construction of the Xiongcun no. II orebody based on the DNN algorithm. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 33185–33203 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13143-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13143-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation