Abstract
Although flood risk assessments are frequently associated with significant uncertainty, formal uncertainty analyses are the exception rather than the rule. We propose to separate two fundamentally different types of uncertainty in flood risk analyses: aleatory and epistemic uncertainty. Aleatory uncertainty refers to quantities that are inherently variable in time, space or populations of individuals or objects. Epistemic uncertainty results from incomplete knowledge and is related to our inability to understand, measure and describe the system under investigation. The separation between aleatory and epistemic uncertainty is exemplified for the flood risk analysis of the city of Cologne, Germany. This flood risk assessment consists of three modules: (1) flood frequency analysis, (2) inundation estimation and (3) damage estimation. By the concept of parallel models, the epistemic uncertainty of each module is quantified. The epistemic uncertainty associated with the risk estimate is reduced by introducing additional information into the risk analysis. Finally, the contribution of different modules to the total uncertainty is quantified. The flood risk analysis results in a flood risk curve, representing aleatory uncertainty, and in associated uncertainty bounds, representing epistemic uncertainty. In this way, the separation reveals the uncertainty (epistemic) that can be reduced by more knowledge and the uncertainty (aleatory) that is not reducible.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apel H, Thieken A, Merz B, Blöschl G (2004) Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4:295–308
Apel H, Merz B, Thieken AH (2008) Quantification of uncertainties in flood risk assessments. J River Basin Manag 6(2):149–162
Bárdossy A, Markovic D (2002) Extremwertstatistik—Bericht des Instituts für Wasserbau, Universität Stuttgart für die Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde (unpublished)
Bobee B, Ashkar F (1988) Review of statistical methods for estimating flood risk with special emphasis on the Log Pearson Type 3 distribution. In: El-Sabh MI, Murty TS (eds) Natural and man-made hazards. D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp 357–367
Büchele B, Kreibich H, Kron A, Thieken AH, Ihringer J, Oberle P, Merz B, Nestmann F (2006) Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks. NHESS 6:485–503
Cullen AC, Frey HC (1999) Probabilistic techniques in exposure assessment. A handbook for dealing with variability and uncertainty in models and inputs. Plenum Press, New York, p 335
Disse M, Engel H (2001) Flood events in the Rhine basins: genesis, influences and mitigation. Nat Hazards 23:271–290
Downton MW, Morss RE, Wilhelmi OV, Gruntfest E, Higgings ML (2005) Interactions between scientific uncertainty and flood management decisions: two case studies in Colorado. Environ Hazards 6:134–146
DVWK (1999) Statistische Analyse von Hochwasserabflüssen. Wirtschafts- und Verlags-Ges. Gas und Wasser, Bonn, p 42
El Adlouni S, Bobée B, Ouarda TBMJ (2008) On the tails of extreme event distributions in hydrology. J Hydrol 355:16–33
Ferson S, Ginzburg LR (1996) Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54:133–144
Fink A, Ulbrich U, Engel H (1996) Aspects of the January 1995 flood in Germany. Weather 51:34–39
Geomer (2009) http://www.geomer.de/produkte/floodarea/index.html. Accessed 12 June 2009
Gouldby B, Sayers P, Mulet-Marti J, Hassan MAAM, Benwell D (2008) A methodology for regional-scale flood risk assessment. Water Manag 161(WM3):169–182
Grünthal G, Thieken AH, Schwarz J, Radtke K, Smolka A, Merz B (2006) Comparative risk assessment for the city of Cologne, Germany—storms, floods, earthquakes. Nat Hazards 38(1–2):21–44
Haimes YY (1998) Risk modeling, assessment, and management, Wiley series in systems engineering. Wiley, New York, p 726
Hall JW (2003) Handling uncertainty in the hydroinformatic process. J Hydroinformatics 05.4:215–232
Hall J, Anderson M (2002) Handling uncertainty in extreme unrepeatable hydrological processes—the need for an alternative paradigm. Hydrol Process 16:1867–1870
Hammitt JK, Shlyakhter AI (1999) The expected value of information and the probability of surprise. Risk Anal 19(1):135–152
Helton JC, Oberkampf WL (2004) Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 85:1–10
Hoffman FO, Hammonds JS (1994) Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: the need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability. Risk Anal 14(5):707–712
Hora SC (1996) Aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in probability elicitation with an example from hazardous waste management. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54:217–223
Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (1997) Regional frequency analysis. An approach based on L-moments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hydrotec (2001) Hochwasser-Aktionsplan Angerbach. Teil I: Berichte und Anlagen. Studie im Auftrag des StUA Düsseldorf, Aachen (unpublished report)
ICPR (2001) Atlas of flood danger and potential damage due to extreme floods of the Rhine. International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR), ISBN 9-935324-43-x
Institute of Hydrology (1999) Flood estimation handbook, vol 1–5. Institute of Hydrology, Crowmarsh Gifford
Kleeberg H-B, Schumann AH (2001) Ableitung von Bemessungsabflüssen kleiner Überschreitungswahrscheinlichkeiten. Wasserwirtschaft 91(2):90–94
Kleist L, Thieken A, Köhler P, Müller M, Seifert I, Borst D, Werner U (2006) Estimation of the regional stock of residential buildings as a basis for comparative risk assessment for Germany. NHESS 6:541–552
Krahe P (1997) Hochwasser und Klimafluktuationen am Rhein seit dem Mittelalter. In: Immendorf R (ed) Hochwasser—Natur im Überfluß?. Müller, Heidelberg, pp 57–82
Kundzewicz ZW, Robson AJ (2004) Change detection in hydrological records—a review of the methodology. J Hydrol Sci 49(1):7–19
Lammersen R, Engel H, Van de Langemheen W, Buiteveld H (2002) Impact of river training and retention measures on flood peaks along the Rhine. J Hydrol 267(1–2):115–124
Merz B, Thieken A (2005) Separating natural and epistemic uncertainty in flood frequency analysis. J Hydrol 309(1–4):114–132
Merz B, Thieken A, Blöschl G (2002) Uncertainty analysis for flood risk estimation, International Commission for the Hydrology of the Rhine basin, Proceedings of the International Conference on Flood Estimation, 6–8 March 2002, Berne, CHR Report II-17, pp 577–585
Merz B, Kreibich H, Thieken A, Schmidtke R (2004) Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4:153–163
Mosley M, McKerchar AI (1992) Streamflow. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 8.1–8.39
MURL (2000) Potentielle Hochwasserschäden am Rhein in NRW. Ministerium für Umwelt. Raumordnung und Landwirtschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. Düsseldorf (unpublished report)
Palmer TN (2000) Predicting uncertainty in forecasts of weather and climate. Rep Prog Phys 63:71–116
Parry GW (1996) The characterization of uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessment of complex systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54:119–126
Petrow T, Merz B (2009) Trends in flood magnitude, frequency and seasonality in Germany in the period 1951–2002. J Hydrol 371:129–141
Petrow T, Zimmer J, Merz B (2009) Changes in the flood hazard through changing frequency and persistence of circulation patterns. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1409–1423
Pfister L, Kwadijk J, Musy A, Bronstert A, Hoffmann L (2004) Climate change, land use change and runoff prediction in the Rhine-Meuse Basins. River Res Appl 20:229–241. doi:10.1002/rra.775
Pinter N, van der Ploeg RR, Schweigert P, Hoefer G (2006) Flood magnification on the River Rhine. Hydrol Process 20:147–164
Stanescu VA (2002) Outstanding floods in Europe: a regionalization and comparison. International Conference on Flood Estimation, Berne, Switzerland CHR-Report II-17, pp 697–706
Stedinger JR, Vogel RM, Foufoula-Georgiou E (1992) Frequency analysis of extreme events. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 18.1–18.66
Svensson C, Kundzewicz ZW, Maurer T (2005) Trend detection in river flow 697 series: 2. Flood and low-flow index series. J Hydrol Sci 50(5):811–824
Thieken AH, Müller M, Kleist L, Seifert I, Borst D, Werner U (2006) Regionalisation of asset values for risk analyses. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:167–178
Thieken AH, Olschewski A, Kreibich H, Kobsch S, Merz B (2008) Development and evaluation of FLEMOps—a new Flood Loss Estimation MOdel for the private sector. In: Proverbs D, Brebbia CA, Penning-Rowsell E (eds) Flood recovery, innovation and response. WIT Press, London, pp 315–324
Van Asselt MBA, Rotmans J (2002) Uncertainty in integrated assessment modelling. Clim Chang 54(1):75–105
Visser H, Folkert RJM, Hoekstra J, de Wolff JJ (2000) Identifying key sources of uncertainty in climate change projections. Clim Chang 45(3–4):421–457
Vogt R (1995) Hochwasser in Köln. In: Dokumentation der Fachtagung “Mit dem Hochwasser leben”, Baden-Baden, pp 48–55
Von Storch H, Zwiers FW (1999) Statistical analysis in climate research. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 484
Watson SR (1994) The meaning of probability in probabilistic safety analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 45:261–269
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the provision of data by Hochwasserschutzzentrale Köln (Flood Defence Centre Cologne).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Merz, B., Thieken, A.H. Flood risk curves and uncertainty bounds. Nat Hazards 51, 437–458 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9452-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9452-6