Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Can green financial development promote regional ecological efficiency? A case study of China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to objectively identify the impact of green finance on the green economy of China, and then put forward some suggestions that good for the government to guide the development of green finance, and promote the full play of finance in promoting development of the green economy. Through constructing an index system and a super-efficiency slack-based model, this study measures the level of green financial development and regional ecological efficiency, respectively, for Chinese 30 provinces between 2010 and 2015. On this basis, taking per capita GDP, industrial structure, urbanization rate, and energy efficiency as controlling variables, we construct a varying intercept model and a varying coefficient model. Our primary findings are that the impact of China’s green financial development on regional ecological efficiency is not obvious in general, and the corresponding average influence coefficient is − 0.1847, which is inconsistent with theoretical analysis. Also, other impacts from per capita GDP, industrial structure, urbanization rate, and energy efficiency on ecological efficiency are statistically significant; the coefficients are − 0.1701, 0.3901, 0.5410, and 0.3022, respectively. Moreover, there are significant regional differences in the impacts of green financial development on ecological efficiency. For some provinces, such as Tianjin, Jilin, and Heilongjiang, green financial development significantly promotes ecological efficiency. However, for Beijing, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang, it is inconsistent with theoretical analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antimiani A, Costantini V, Markandya A et al (2017) The Green Climate Fund as an effective compensatory mechanism in global climate negotiations. Environ Sci Policy 77:49–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chami R, Cosimano TF, Fullenkamp C (2002) Managing ethical risk: how investing in ethics adds value. J Bank Finance 9:1697–1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z (2017) The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: a panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 76:138–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen P, Lu Y-T, Gao J et al (2016) Study on the construction and propulsion mechanism of green financial system in China. Environ Prot Sci 1:52–56 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen NC, Lei X, Chen ZQ (2017) Environmental efficiency analysis of the Yangtze River Economic Zone using super efficiency data envelopment analysis (SEDEA) and tobit models. Energy 134:659–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Climent F, Soriano P (2011) Green and good? The investment performance of US environmental mutual funds. J Bus Ethics 103(2):275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan E (1999) Topical issues in environmental finance. Research paper was commissioned by the Asia Branch of the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) 1:1–20

  • Cui L, Huang Y (2018) Exploring the schemes for green climate fund financing: international lessons. World Dev 101:173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durusu-Ciftci D, Ispir MS, Yetkiner H (2017) Financial development and economic growth: some theory and more evidence. J Policy Model 39(2):290–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty M, Gevorkyan A, Radpour S et al (2016) Financing climate policies through climate bonds–a three stage model and empirics. Res Int Bus Finance 42:468–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaz V, Gars J, Moberg F et al (2015) Why ecologists should care about financial markets. Trends Ecol Evol 30(10):571–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Li Z, Wang F et al (2018) A game theory approach for corporate environmental risk mitigation. Resour Conserv Recycl 130:240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Y-Q, Chen L-X, Jiao J-X et al (2017) Study on the relationship between spatial–temporal differences of financial agglomeration and provincial ecological efficiency. Math Stat Manag 1:162–174 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho TQ, Hoang VN, Wilson C et al (2018) Eco-efficiency analysis of sustainability-certified coffee production in Vietnam. J Clean Prod 183:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdren JP, Ehrlich PR (1974) Human population and the global environment. Am Sci 62(3):282–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu B, Fu Y-T (2016) Empirical study on ecological efficiency measurement and spatial difference in China-based on the analysis of SBM model and spatial autocorrelation. J Arid Land Resour Environ 6:6–12 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang JH, Lv H-L, Wang J-L (2014a) The mechanism of the influence of financial development on regional green development-based on the research of ecological efficiency and spatial quantity. Geogr Res 33(03):532–545 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Yang X, Cheng G et al (2014b) A comprehensive eco-efficiency model and dynamics of regional eco-efficiency in China. J Clean Prod 67:228–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Júnior RDL, Nunes AO, Silva DAL (2018) Creating value with less impact: lean, green and eco-efficiency in a metalworking industry towards a cleaner production. J Clean Prod 196:517–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Ding H (2016) Research on the construction of green financial system under the framework of “the belt and road initiative”. Environ Prot 19:31–35 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Li Y-B (2015) An empirical analysis on the evolution of ecological efficiency and its influencing factors in China. Stat Decis 15:120–122 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Li S-S (2017) The impact of fiscal expenditure and financial development on economic growth: nonlinear effect and correlation mechanism. Financ Res 2:21–29 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J-J, Luo N-S (2016) The influence of urban scale on ecological efficiency and regional difference analysis. Popul Resour Environ China 2:129–136 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Song C-X, Wu J (2016) Financial agglomeration and regional economic growth driven by innovation. Financ Sci 1:88–99 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu B-Q, Li L-M, Song J-K (2011) Measurement and difference analysis of regional ecological efficiency in China. Techno-Econ Manag Res 10:3–6 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao J-S, Zeng R, Du C-Y et al (2010) Eco-efficiency of China’s industrial sectors. Environ Sci 11:2788–2794 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng AW (2018) From sustainability accounting to a green financing system: institutional legitimacy and market heterogeneity in a global financial centre. J Clean Prod 195:585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham L (2016) Is it risky to go green? A volatility analysis of the green bond market. J Sustain Finance Invest 6(4):263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu S (2008) Study on the ecological efficiency of regional economic development in China. Energy Environ 4(8–10):13 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar J (1998) Environmental finance: linking two world. In: A workshop on financial innovations for biodiversity, vol 1. Bratislava, pp 2–18

  • Schaltegger S, Sturm A (1990) Ökologische Rationalität: Ansatzpunkte zur Ausgestaltung von ökologieorientierten Managementinstrumenten. Die Unternehmung 44(4):273–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens B (2017) Why finance should care about ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 32(7):500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song M, Song Y, An Q et al (2013) Review of environmental efficiency and its influencing factors in China: 1998–2009. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 20:8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin GA, Salahuddin M, Alam K et al (2017) Ecological footprint and real income: panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecol Ind 77:166–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Wheeler D (2005) Financial incentives and endogenous enforcement in China’s pollution levy system. J Environ Econ Manag 49(1):174–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing Z-C, Wang J-G, Zhang J (2014) Study on the total factor ecological efficiency and its influencing factors in China’s region. China Popul Resour Environ 28(07):119–126 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y-C (2014) Financial development and economic growth: based on the analysis of the threshold variable of China’s financial. Financ Res 2:59–71 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J-Y, Zhang S-D (2018) Research on the spatial effect of regional financial development on economic growth. J Hunan Univ (Social Sciences) 32(01):82–92 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Lan Q, Liu P et al (2017) Insurance as a market mechanism in managing regional environmental and safety risks. Resour Conserv Recycl 124:62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng X-W, Liu Y-Q, Man MJ et al (2014) Analysis and measurement of the development of green finance in China. J China Yan’an Cadre Coll 7(06):112-121 + 105 (in Chinese)

  • Zheng D-F, Hao S, Sun C-Z, Lv L-T (2018) Temporal and spatial evolution analysis and trend prediction of ecological efficiency in China. Geogr Res 37(05):1034–1046 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support provided by the Key Program of National Statistical Science Research of China under Grant No. 2016LZ13, the Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science project of China under Grant No. 16YJAZH015, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 71742001, 71203219.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, No. 1 Daxue Road, Quanshan District, Xuzhou, 221116, Jiangsu, China

    Rongyan Liu, Deqing Wang, Li Zhang & Lihong Zhang

Authors
  1. Rongyan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deqing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lihong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deqing Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, R., Wang, D., Zhang, L. et al. Can green financial development promote regional ecological efficiency? A case study of China. Nat Hazards 95, 325–341 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3502-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3502-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation