Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Biomechanics of nodal, seminal and lateral roots of barley: effects of diameter, waterlogging and mechanical impedance

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

Biomechanical properties of cereal root systems largely control both resistance to root lodging and their ability to stabilise soil. Abiotic stresses can greatly modify root system growth and form. In this paper the effect of waterlogging and moderate mechanical impedance on root biomechanics is studied for both lateral roots and the main axes of barley.

Methods

Barley (Hordeum vulgare) plants were subjected to transient water-logging and moderate mechanical impedance in repacked soil columns. Roots were excavated, separated into types (nodal, seminal or lateral) and tested in tension to measure strength and elastic modulus.

Results

Water-logging and mechanical impedance substantially changed root system growth whilst root biomechanical properties were affected by waterlogging. Root strength was generally greater in thin roots and depended on root type. For example, seminal roots 0.4–0.6 mm in diameter were approximately seven times stronger and five times stiffer than lateral roots of the same diameter when mechanically impeded. Root sample populations typically exhibited negative power-law relationships between root strength and diameter for all root types. Mechanical impedance slowed seminal root elongation by approximately 50 % and resulted in a 15 % and 11 % increase in the diameter of in nodal and seminal roots respectively. Power-law relationships between root diameter and root biomechanical properties corresponded to the different root types. Coefficients for between root diameter, strength and elastic modulus improved when separated by root type, with R2 values increasing in some roots from 0.05 to 0.71 for root strength and 0.08 to 0.74 for elastic modulus.

Conclusions

Moderate mechanical impedance did not influence the tensile strength of roots, but, waterlogging diminished the relationship between root strength and diameter. Separation of root type improved predictions of root strength and elastic modulus using power-law regressions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Abe K, Ziemer RR (1991) Effect of tree roots on a shear zone—modeling reinforced shear-stress. Can J For Res 21:1012–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beek L, Wint J, Cammeraat L, Edwards J (2005) Observation and simulation of root reinforcement on abandoned Mediterranean slopes. Plant Soil 278:55–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bengough AG, Bransby MF, Hans J, McKenna SJ, Roberts TJ, Valentine TA (2006) Root responses to soil physical conditions; growth dynamics from field to cell. J Exp Bot 57:437–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berry PM, Sterling M, Spink JH, Baker CJ, Sylvester-Bradley R, Mooney SJ, Tams AR, Ennos AR (2004) Understanding and reducing lodging in cereals. Elsevier Academic Press Inc, San Diego, p 271

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischetti GB, Chiaradia EA, Simonato T, Speziali B, Vitali B, Vullo P, Zocco A (2005) Root strength and root area ratio of forest species in Lombardy (Northern Italy). Plant Soil 278:11–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bischetti GB, Chiaradia EA, Epis T, Morlotti E (2009) Root cohesion of forest species in the Italian Alps. Plant Soil 324:71–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crook MJ, Ennos AR (1993) The mechanics of root lodging in winter-wheat, triticum-aestivum l. J Exp Bot 44:1219–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels HE (1945) The statistical theory of the strength of bundles of threads.1. Proc Roy Soc A-Math Phys 183:405–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich RC, Bengough AG, Jones HG, White PJ (2012) A new physical interpretation of plant root capacitance. J Exp Bot 63:6149–6159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engelaar WMHG, Jacobs MHHE, Blom CWPM (1993) Root-growth of Rumex and Plantago species in compacted and waterlogged soils. Acta Bot Neerlandica 42:25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennos AR (1989) The mechanics of anchorage in seedlings of sunflower, Helianthus-annuus l. New Phytol 113:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennos AR (1991a) The mechanics of anchorage in wheat triticum-aestivum l.1. the anchorage of wheat seedlings. J Exp Bot 42:1601–1606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennos AR (1991b) The mechanics of anchorage in wheat triticum-aestivum l.2. Anchorage of mature wheat against lodging. J Exp Bot 42:1607–1613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennos AR, Crook MJ, Grimshaw C (1993) The anchorage mechanics of Maize, Zea-mays. J Exp Bot 44:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans DE (2004) Aerenchyma formation. New Phytol 161:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favis-Mortlock DT, Guerra SJT (1999) The implications of general circulation model estimates of rainfall for future erosion: a case study from Brazil. Catena 37:329–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genet M, Stokes A, Salin F, Mickovski S, Fourcaud T, Dumail JF, van Beek R (2005) The influence of cellulose content on tensile strength in tree roots. Plant Soil 278:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Genet M, Kokutse N, Stokes A, Fourcaud T, Cai X, Ji J, Mickovski S (2008) Root reinforcement in plantations of Cryptomeria japonica D. Don: effect of tree age and stand structure on slope stability. For Ecol Manag 256:1517–1526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hales TC, Ford CR, Hwang T, Vose JM, Band LE (2009) Topographic and ecologic controls on root reinforcement. J Geophys Res-Earth 114:FO3013

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepworth DG, Vincent JFV (1998) The mechanical properties of xylem tissue from tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum ‘Samsun’). Ann Bot 81:751–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepworth DG, Vincent JFV (1999) The growth response of the stems of genetically modified tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum ‘Samsun’) to flexural stimulation. Ann Bot 83:39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iijima M, Kato J (2007) Combined soil physical stress of soil drying, anaerobiosis and mechanical impedance to seedling root growth of four crop species. Plant Prod Sci 10:451–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishaq M, Hassan A, Saeed M, Ibrahim M, Lal R (2001) Subsoil compaction effects on crops in Punjab, Pakistan: I. Soil physical properties and crop yield. Soil Tillage Res 59:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loades KW, Bengough AG, Bransby MF, Hallett PD (2010) Planting density influence on fibrous root reinforcement of soils. Ecol Eng 36:276–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik AI, Colmer TD, Lambers H, Setter TL, Schortemeyer M (2002) Short-term waterlogging has long-term effects on the growth and physiology of wheat. New Phytol 153:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickovski SB, Bengough AG, Bransby MF, Davies MCR, Hallett PD, Sonnenberg R (2007) Material stiffness, branching pattern and soil matric potential affect the pullout resistance of model root systems. Eur J Soil Sci 58:1471–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickovski S, Hallett PD, Bransby MF, Davies MCR, Sonnenberg R, Bengough AG (2009) Mechanical reinforcement of soil by willow roots: impacts of root properties and root failure mechanism. Soil Sci Soc Am J :1276–1285

  • Niklas KJ (1998) Effects of vibration on mechanical properties and biomass allocation pattern of Capsella bursa-pastoris (Cruciferae). Ann Bot-London 82:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niklas KJ, Molina-Freaner F, Tinoco-Ojanguren C, Paolillo DJ (2002) The biomechanics of Pachycereus pringlei root systems. Am J Bot 89:12–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niklas KJ, Spatz HC, Vincent J (2006) Plant biomechanics: an overview and prospectus. Am J Bot 93:1369–1378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oladokun MAO, Ennos AR (2006) Structural development and stability of rice Oryza sativa L. var. Nerica 1. J Exp Bot 57:3123–3130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pollen N, Simon A (2005) Estimating the mechanical effects of riparian vegetation on stream bank stability using a fiber bundle model. Water Resour Res 41:W07025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahnoune M, Adda A, Soualem S, Harch MK, Merah O (2004) Early water-deficit effects on seminal roots morphology in barley. C R Biol 327:389–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt S, Gregory PJ, Grinev DV, Bengough AG (2013) Contrasting responses of maize and lupin root growth to compact and dry soil are similar in their association of root elongation rate with length of the non-root hair—bearing apical region. Accepted with minor revisions in Plant and Soil

  • Schwarz M, Preti F, Giadrossich F, Lehmann P, Or D (2010) Quantifying the role of vegetation in slope stability: a case study in Tuscany (Italy). Ecol Eng 36:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott DI, Tams AR, Berry PM, Mooney SJ (2005) The effects of wheel-induced soil compaction on anchorage strength and resistance to root lodging of winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Soil Tillage Res 82:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes A, Mattheck C (1996) Variation of wood strength in tree roots. J Exp Bot 47:693–699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Striker GG, Insausti P, Grimoldi AA, Vega AS (2007) Trade-off between root porosity and mechanical strength in species with different types of aerenchyma. Plant Cell Environ 30:580–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Visser EJW, Voesenek LACJ (2005) Acclimation to soil flooding—sensing and signal-transduction. Plant Soil 274:197–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron LJ (1977) Shear resistance of root-permeated homogeneous and stratified soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:843–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt M, Magee LJ, McCully ME (2008) Types, structure and potential for axial water flow in the deepest roots of field-grown cereals. New Phytol 178:135–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whalley WR, Watts CW, Gregory AS, Mooney SJ, Clark LJ, Whitmore AP (2008) The effect of soil strength on the yield of wheat. Plant Soil 306:237–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu JINM, Brown KM, Lynch JP (2010) Root cortical aerenchyma improves the drought tolerance of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Cell Environ 33:740–749

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the BBSRC for funding a PhD studentship (BBS/S/K/2005/12211A) for Kenneth Loades. The James Hutton Institute receives funding from the Scottish Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. W. Loades.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Eric J. W. Visser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loades, K.W., Bengough, A.G., Bransby, M.F. et al. Biomechanics of nodal, seminal and lateral roots of barley: effects of diameter, waterlogging and mechanical impedance. Plant Soil 370, 407–418 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1643-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1643-y

Keywords