Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

A longitudinal analysis of citation distribution breadth for Chinese scholars

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, the research behavior of Chinese scholars has continually evolved. This paper studied the citing behavior of Chinese scholars by employing three indicators of citation concentration from the perspective of citation breadth analysis. All the citations from 2,338,033 papers from the Chinese Citation Database (1979–2008) covering four disciplines—Chemistry; Clinical Medicine; Library, Information and Archival Science; and Chinese Literature and World Literature—were analyzed. Empirical results show a general weakening tendency towards citation concentration: (1) decreasing percentage of uncited published papers within a given year; (2) a higher percentage of papers required to account for the same proportion of citation than before; and (3) the steady decline in the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI) of citation distribution. All three measures indicate a decline in citing concentration or an increase in citation breadth. This phenomenon may be the result of increased access to materials, perhaps because of the ease with which scholarly materials can be accessed through the Internet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • CNKI. (2008). Project milestones. Retrieved January 10, 2010, from http://www.cnki.net/gycnki/gycnki04_1.htm.

  • Egghe, L. (2010). A model showing the increase in time of the average and median reference age and the decrease in time of the Price index. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0057-3.

  • Evans, J. A., et al. (2008). Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship. Science, 321(5887), 395–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1983). Citation indexing—its theory and application in science, technology and humanities Philadelphia. ISI Press, 12–56.

  • Garfield, E. (1998). I had a dream…about uncitedness. The Scientist, 12, 10.

  • Gray, K., Thompson, C., & Clerehan, et al. (2008). Web 2.0 authorship: Issues of referencing and citation for academic integrity. The Internet and Higher Education, 11, 112–118.

  • Hooker, H. (2008). An open access partisan’s view of “Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship”. Retrieved January 10, 2010, from http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2008/07/an_open_access_partisans_view.php.

  • Koenig, M. E. D. (1983). Bibliometric indicators versus expert opinion in assessing research performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34, 136–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2007). How is science cited on the web? A classification of google unique web citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 1631–1644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V. (2006). The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1997–10040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V., Archambault, É., & Gingras, Y. (2008). Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady-state science (1900–2004). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 288–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2009). The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 858–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawani, S. M., & Bayer, A. E. (1983). Validity of citation criteria for assessing the influence of scientific publications: new evidence with peer assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34, 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (2010). Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meho. (2007).The rise and rise of citation analysis. Physics World, 1, 32–36.

  • Pendlebury, D. (1991). Science, citation, and funding. Science, 251, 1410–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peritz, B. C. (1983). A note on “scholarliness” and “impact”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34, 360–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, A., & Liston-Heyes, C. (2004). Inventive concentration: An analysis of fuel cell patents. Science and Public Policy, 31(1), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. D. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 145, 510–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, J. (2007). The informetrics (pp. 103–108). Wuhan: Wuhan University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, R. E. (2004). Foundations of library and information science (2nd ed., pp. 220–288). New York: Neal-Schuman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, C. A. (1997). The rise and fall of uncitedness. College & Research Libraries, 58(1), 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sina in China. (2003). The first event in Chinese Internet. Retrieved October 15, 2009, from http://tech.sina.com.cn/i/w/2003-11-17/1545257151.shtml.

  • Stern, R. E. (1990). Uncitedness in the biomedical literature. Journal of the American society for information science, 41(3), 193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Bartheld, C. S. (2009). To each citation, a Purpose. Science, 323(5910), 36–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z. (2009). An empirical study of the accessibility of web references in two Chinese academic journals. Scientometrics, 78(3), 481–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S. L. (2010). An empirical study on the utilization of web academic resources in humanities and social sciences based on web citations. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0142-7.

  • Zhao, D. (2002). Citation analysis using scientific publications on the Web as data source: A case study in the XML research area. Scientometrics, 54(3), 449–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Humanities and Social Science Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (09YJC870027) and enlightening comments from reviewers. We would also like to extend special thanks to Ronghui Zhang, Qingyuan Wu, and Navarro A. Richard for proof-reading our paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siluo Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, S., Ma, F., Song, Y. et al. A longitudinal analysis of citation distribution breadth for Chinese scholars. Scientometrics 85, 755–765 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0245-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0245-1

Keywords