Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Web visibility of scholars in media and communication journals

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the Web visibility of researchers in the field of communication. First, we measured the Web visibility of authors who have recently published their research in communication journals contained in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) provided by the Web of Science. Second, we identified a subset of authors based on their publication outlets and summarize those researchers with the highest Web presence. Lastly, we determined the factors affecting their Web visibility by using a set of national and linguistic variables of the individual researchers. Web data were collected by using a Bing.com advanced search tool based on the API. Web presence is defined as the number of Web (co-) mentions of each researcher. We identified the most solely-visible scholars in the entire communication webosphere and scholars with the most networked visibility based on co-mentions. There is a weak but statistically significant correlation between researchers’ Web visibility and their SSCI publication counts. Further, US-based and/or English-speaking scholars were more noticeable than others on cyberspace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaltojärvi, I., Arminen, I., Auranen, O., & Pasanen, H. (2008). Scientific productivity Web visibility and citation patterns in sixteen nordic sociology departments. Acta Sociologica, 51, 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguillo, I. F., Granadino, B., Ortega, J. L., & Prieto, J. A. (2006). Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetrics indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1296–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barjak, F., Li, X., & Thelwall, M. (2007). Which factors explain the Web impact of scientists’ personal homepages? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 200–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 2–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldas, A. (2006). On Web structure and digital knowledge bases: Online and offline connections in science. In C. Hine (Ed.), New infrastructures for knowledge production: Understanding e-Science (pp. 206–232). London: Sage.

  • Cronin, B. (2001). Bibliometrics and beyond: Some thoughts on Web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 26, 329–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espadas, J., Calero, C., & Piattini, M. (2008). Web site visibility evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1727–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimeriks, G., & Vasileiadou, E. (2008). Changes or transition? analysing the use of ICTs in the sciences. Social Science Information, 47, 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen, P. (1998). The calculation of Web impact. Journal of Documentation, 54, 236–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasco, P. (2005). Google Scholar: The pros and the cons. Online Information Review, 29, 208–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2007). Google Scholars citations and Google Web/URL citation: A multidiscipline exploratory analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1055–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, H. (2004). Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web. Scientometrics, 60, 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, H., Kretschmer, U., & Kretschmer, T. (2007). Reflection of co-authorship networks in the Web: Web hyperlinks versus Web visibility rates. Scientometrics, 70, 519–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, S., & Giles, C. L. (2004). Accessibility of information on the Web. Science, 400, 107–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Park, H. W. (2012). Exploring the Web visibility of world-class universities. Scientometrics, 90, 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, E. T., & Schroeder, R. (2009). The World Wide Web of research and access to knowledge. Knowledge Management Research Practice, 7, 218–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notess, G. R. (2003). Search engine statistics: Relative size showdown. Retrieved from http://www.searchengineshowdown.com/statistics/size.shtml.

  • Park, H. W., & Thelwall, M. (2006). Web science communication in the age of globalization. New Media and Society., 8, 629–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Link analysis: Hyperlink patterns and social structure on politicians’ Web sites in South Korea. Quality and Quantity, 42, 687–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, D. (2006). Nielsen Netrating search engine ratings. Retrieved from http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2067079/Nielsen-NetRatings-Search-Engine- Ratings.

  • Thelwall, M. (2001). Results from a Web impact factor crawler. Journal of Documentation, 57, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2011). Introduction to Webometric Analyst: A research tool for social scientists. Retrieved from lexiurl.wlv.ac.uk/searcher/IntroductionToWebometricAnalyst2.doc.

  • Thelwall, M., & Harries, G. (2004). Do better scholars’ Web publications have significantly higher online impact? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., & Sud, P. (2011). A comparison of methods for collecting Web citation data for academic organisations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 1488–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Tang, R., & Price, L. (2003). Linguistic patterns of academic Web use in Western Europe. Scientometrics, 56(3), 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Li, X., Barjak, F., & Robinson, S. (2008). Assessing the international Web connectivity of research groups. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 60, 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2003). Bibliographic and Web citation: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 1313–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D. (2005). Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science: A comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals. Information Processing Management, 41, 1403–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The corresponding author acknowledges that this work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2010-330-B00232, Social Science Korea Program). Many thanks go to Yeon-ok Lee and research assistants, Ji-Young Park, Ji-Young Kim, Seoung-Cheol Choi, and Ho-Young Yoon.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Woo Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, C.J., Park, H.W. Web visibility of scholars in media and communication journals. Scientometrics 93, 207–215 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0707-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0707-8

Keywords