Abstract
This article introduces a method for identifying potential opportunities of innovation arising from the convergence of different technological areas, based on the presence of edge outliers in a patent citation network. Edge outliers are detected via the assessment of their centrality; pairs of patents connected by edge outliers are then analyzed for technological relatedness and past involvement in technological convergence. The pairs with the highest potential for future convergence are finally selected and their keywords combined to suggest new directions of innovation. We illustrate our method on a data set of US patents in the field of digital information and security.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.References
Abbas, A., Zhang, L., & Khan, S. U. (2014). A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information, 37, 3–13.
Bollen, K. A., & Jackman, R. W. (1990). Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases. Modern Methods of Data Analysis, 13(4), 257–291.
Chang, P., Wu, C., & Leu, H. (2010). Using patent analyses to monitor the technological trends in an emerging field of technology: A case of carbon nanotube field emission display. Scientometrics, 82(1), 5–19.
Choi, S., Yoon, J., Kim, K., Lee, J. Y., & Kim, C. H. (2011). SAO network analysis of patents for technology trends identification: A case study of polymer electrolyte membrane technology in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Scientometrics, 88(3), 863–883.
Golub, G. H., & Van Loan, C. F. (1996). Matrix computations (3rd ed.). Baltimore: JHU Press.
Hacklin, F., Raurich, V., & Marxt, C. (2004). How incremental innovation becomes disruptive: The case of technology convergence. In Proceedings 2004 IEEE international engineering management conference (vol. 1, pp. 32–36).
Kim, B., Gazzola, G., Lee, J. M., Kim, D., Kim, K., & Jeong, M. K. (2014). Inter-cluster connectivity analysis for technology opportunity discovery. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1811–1825.
Kim, D., Lee, B., Lee, H. J., Lee, S. P., Moon, Y., & Jeong, M. K. (2012). Automated detection of influential patents using singular values. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 9(4), 723–733.
Lee, C., Cho, Y., Seol, H., & Park, Y. (2012). A stochastic patent citation analysis approach to assessing future technological impacts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(1), 16–29.
Lee, Y., Kim, S. Y., Song, I., Park, Y., & Shin, J. (2013). Technology opportunity identification customized to the technological capability of SMEs through two-stage patent analysis. Scientometrics, 100(1), 1–18.
Lee, Y., Kim, S. Y., Song, I., Park, Y., & Shin, J. (2014). Technology opportunity identification customized to the technological capability of SMEs through two-stage patent analysis. Scientometrics, 100(1), 227–244.
Lee, M., Lee, S., Kim, J., Seo, D., Kim, P., Jung, H., Lee, J., Kim, T., Koo, H. K., & Sung, W. K. (2011). Decision-making support service based on technology opportunity discovery model. In International Conference on U-and E-service, Science and Technology (pp. 263–268). Berlin: Springer.
Lee, S., Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2009). An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach. Technovation, 29(6), 481–497.
Liu, S., Liao, H., Pi, S., & Hu, J. (2011). Development of a patent retrieval and analysis platform-a hybrid approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7864–7868.
Ma, J., & Porter, A. L. (2015). Analyzing patent topical information to identify technology pathways and potential opportunities. Scientometrics, 102(1), 811–827.
Madani, F., Daim, T., & Weng, C. (2017). ‘Smart building’ technology network analysis: Applying core–periphery structure analysis. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 12(1), 1–11.
Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2003). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113.
Park, H. S., Ree, J. J., & Kim, K. (2013). Identification of promising patents for technology transfers using TRIZ evolution trends. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(2), 736–743.
Petruzzelli, A. M. (2011). The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university–industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis. Technovation, 31(7), 309–319.
Porter, A. L., & Detampel, M. J. (1995). Technology opportunities analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 49(3), 237–255.
Rodriguez, A., Kim, B., Lee, J. M., Coh, B. Y., & Jeong, M. K. (2015a). Graph kernel based measure for evaluating the influence of patents in a patent citation network. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 1479–1486.
Rodriguez, A., Kim, B., Turkoz, M., Lee, J. M., Coh, B. Y., & Jeong, M. K. (2015b). New multi-stage similarity measure for calculation of pairwise patent similarity in a patent citation network. Scientometrics, 103(2), 565–581.
Schuh, G., & Grawatsch, M. (2004). TRIZ-based technology intelligence. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on management of technology. Anais eletrônicos. Washington: IAMOT (pp. 85–111).
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.
Strang, G. (2011). Introduction to linear algebra. Wellesley: Wellesley Cambridge Press.
Theodoridis, S., & Koutroumbas, K. (2009). Pattern recognition (4th ed.). Cambridge: Academic Press.
Wang, W., & Cheung, C. (2011). A semantic-based intellectual property management system (SIPMS) for supporting patent analysis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 24(8), 1510–1520.
Winnink, J. J., & Tijssen, R. J. (2015). Early stage identification of breakthroughs at the interface of science and technology: Lessons drawn from a landmark publication. Scientometrics, 102(1), 113–134.
Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2012). Detecting signals of new technological opportunities using semantic patent analysis and outlier detection. Scientometrics, 90(2), 445–461.
Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2005). A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: Keyword-based morphology analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(2), 145–160.
Yoon, B., Park, I., & Coh, B. Y. (2014). Exploring technological opportunities by linking technology and products: Application of morphology analysis and text mining. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 86, 287–303.
Zhang, H., Kiranyaz, S., & Gabbouj, M. (2016). Outlier edge detection using random graph generation models and applications. Technical reports, arXiv:1606.06447.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the anonymous reviewers and editor for their helpful and constructive comments that greatly contributed to improving the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, B., Gazzola, G., Yang, J. et al. Two-phase edge outlier detection method for technology opportunity discovery. Scientometrics 113, 1–16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2472-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2472-1