Abstract
The development of the scientific output of Mexico in Applied Physics is explored from 1973 to 2017 in the Web of Science using traditional bibliometric indicators such as prolific authors and institutions; collaborating countries; journal preferences. A total of 9078 documents in the subject category of Applied Physics were retrieved and analyzed in five periods: 1973–1985, 1986–1995, 1996–2005, 2006–2010 and 2011–2017. Main findings point to an exponential increase in the production of Mexican papers over the 45 years of our study but with some slowing down in the first decade of the present century. A diversity of authors both national and foreign were identified but production found to be highly concentrated in five Mexican institutions. Journals were mainly those in basic sciences of Physics, Material Science, and Optics but with Energy and Fuels, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging appearing around the turn of the century. In a second part of the study a text mining technique is used to determine the most frequently occurring words in the abstracts of the documents from 1985 onwards. In a similar exercise the main words found in the 911 literature reviews published worldwide in the category of Applied Physics during 2014, were examined with the purpose of providing relevant information for deciding on the desired path for future Mexican research in this area. Our results suggest that national efforts in this category are aligned with international interests in nanotechnology, particularly with respect to renewable and sustainable energy resources and mainly solar energy technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
From here, we are using acronyms for all Mexican institutions, the list of these acronyms is provided in the “Appendix”.
We do not show in the Table 1 the following paper types : Correction; Review-Book Chapter; Editorial Material-Book Chapter; Meeting abstract, as their contribution was insignificant or non-relevant to our study, when compared to the other document types. This explains why the totals do not correspond to the sum of the columns. The document type Note, which included Short Papers, Brief Communications, and Technical Notes, was merged with Article in 1996 (Clarivite 2020b).
References
Aleman Nava, G. S., Casiano Flores, V. H., Cárdenas Chávez, D. L., Díaz Chávez, R., Scarlat, N., Mahlknecht, J., et al. (2014). Renewable energy research progress in Mexico: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 32, 140–153.
AMC, Academia Mexicana de Ciencias. (2010a). Atlas Mexicana de la Ciencia. http://atlasdelacienciamexicana.org/cienciasfisicas/pdf/fisicatabla2-22.pdf.
AMC, Academia Mexicana de Ciencias. (2010b). Atlas Mexicana de la Ciencia. http://atlasdelacienciamexicana.org/cienciasfisicas/pdf/fisicatabla2-18c.pdf.
AMC, Academia Mexicana de Ciencias. (2010c). Atlas Mexicana de la Ciencia. http://atlasdelacienciamexicana.org/cienciasfisicas/pdf/fisicatabla2-23b.pdf.
Anzaldo, M., Chauvet, M., & Maldonado, L. A. (2014). Fondos públicos para la investigación en nanotecnologías en México y el cambio de paradigma de la política de CTI. Interciencia, 39, 8–15.
Barrios, C., Flores, E., Martínez, M. A., & Ruiz-Martínez, M. (2019). Is there convergence in international research collaboration? An exploration at the country level in the basic and applied science fields. Scientometrics, 120, 631–659.
Braun, T., Gómez, I., Méndez, A., & Schubert, A. (1992). International co-authorship patterns in physics and its subfields, 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 24, 181–200.
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Krupp, H. (1995). The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–1993. Part i. All fields combined, mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics. Scientometrics, 33, 263–293.
Cedano, K. G., Ricalde, K. F., del Río, J. A., & Martínez, M. (2014). Solar energy research in Ibero-America, a citation mining approach. Energy Procedia, 57, 930–939.
Clarivite., Clarivate Analytics. (2020a). Keywords-Plus. https://support.clarivate.com/ScientificandAcademicResearch/s/article/KeyWords-Plus-generation-creation-and-changes?language=en_US.
Clarivite., Clarivate Analytics. (2020b). Web-of-Science-Core-Collection-Document-Type-Note-merged-with-Article;. https://support.clarivate.com/ScientificandAcademicResearch/s/article/Web-of-Science-Core-Collection-Document-Type-Note-merged-with-Article?language=en_US.
Collazo-Reyes, F. (2002). Dinámica de la literatura citada en la física mexicana en el período de mayor crecimiento. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 24, 395–407.
Collazo-Reyes, F., Herrera-Corral, G., & Baños, A. (2008). Surgimiento de la física y la investigación académica en México. Avance y Perspectiva, 1, 85–99.
Collazo-Reyes, F., Pérez-Angón, M. A., & Russell, J. M. (2010). Una visión de la física mexicana. Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Física, 24, 227–234.
CONACYT, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. (2014). Programa Especial de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación 2014-2018. http://www.siicyt.gob.mx/index.php/normatividad/nacional/631-3-programa-especial-de-ciencia-tecnologia-e-innovacion-2014-2018/file.
CONACYT, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. (2018a). Criterios Específicos de Evaluación. Área I: Físico Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Tierra.https://www.conacyt.gob.mx/index.php/el-conacyt/sistema-nacional-de-investigadores/marco-legal/criterios-sni/13714-criterios-especificos-ai/file.
CONACYT, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. (2018b). Programa de Redes Temáticas. https://www.conacyt.gob.mx/index.php/el-conacyt/desarrollo-cientifico/redes-tematicas-conacyt.
Cortés, H. D., del Río, J. A., & García, E. O. (2005). Web Implementations of Entropy-like Algorithm for Citation Mining. WSEAS Transactions on Informational Sciences and Applications, 2, 1430–1437.
Cortés, H. D., del Río, J. A., García, E. O., & Robles, M. (2006). Web application to profiling scientific institutions through citation mining. Enformatika, 14, 419–423.
Donner, P. (2017). Document type assignment accuracy in the journal citation index data of Web of Science. Scientometrics, 113, 219–236.
Flores-Vargas, X., & Collazo-Reyes, F. (2018). Diversificación geográfica de prácticas científicas y fortalecimiento de capacidades científico-técnicas locales en México, 1980–2013 / Geographic diversification of scientific practices and strengthening in local technical scientific capacities in Mexico, 1980–2013. Tla-Melaua Nueva Época, 11(43), 6–22.
Foladori, G., Arteaga-Figueroa, E., Záyago-Lau, E., Appelbaum, R., Robles-Belmont, E., Villa, L., et al. (2015). Nanotechnology in Mexico: Key findings based on OECD criteria. Minerva, 53, 279–301.
Frixione, E., & Laclette, J. P. (2017). Mexico’s basic science funding falls short. Science, 357, 260–261.
Frixione, E., Ruiz-Zamarripa, L., & Hernández, G. (2016). Assessing individual intellectual output in scientific research: Mexico’s national system for evaluating scholars performance in the humanities and the behavioral sciences. PLOS ONE, 11, e0155732.
García-Colín, L. S. (2013). Perspectiva de la física en México. Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Física, 25, 87–90.
Glänzel, W., & Schlemmer, B. (2007). National research profiles in a changing Europe (1983–2003) An exploratory study of sectoral characteristics in the Triple Helix. Scientometrics, 70(2), 267–275.
Kostoff, R. N., & del Río, J. A. (2001). The impact of physics research. Physics World, 14(6), 47–51.
Kostoff, R. N., Braun, T., Schubert, A., Toothman, D. R., & Humenik, J. A. (2000). Fullerene data mining using bibliometrics and database technology. Journal of Chemical Information and Computing Science, 40, 19–39.
Kostoff, R. N., del Río, J. A., Cortés, H. D., Smith, C., Smith, A., Wagner, C., et al. (2005). The structure and infrastructure of Mexico’s science and technology. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 72(7), 798–814.
Lancho-Barrantes, B. S., & Cantú-Ortiz, F. J. (2019). Science in Mexico: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 118(2), 499–517.
Li, K., Rollins, J., & Yan, E. (2018). Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics, 115, 1–20.
Losiewicz, P., Oard, D. W., & Kostoff, R. N. (2000). Textual data mining to support science and technology management. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 15, 99–119.
Manzano-Agugliaro, F., Alcayde, A., Montoya, F. G., Zapata-Sierra, A., & Gil, C. (2013). Scientific production of renewable energies worldwide: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 134–143.
Menchaca, A. (2000). Las ciencias exactas en México. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Chap. III. La física en México. Los temas y las instituciones.
Menchaca, A. (2001). El impulso de la física. Ciencia, octubre, 98–103.
Muñoz-Écija, T., Vargas-Quesada, B., & Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z. (2017). Identification and visualization of the intellectual structure and main research lines in nanoscience and nanotechnology at the worldwide level. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 19, 62.
OECD. (2006). Gross Domestic Spending on R & D. 1981-2017;. https://data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm.
Ortuno, M., Carpena, P., Bernaola-Galvan, P., Muñoz, E., & Somoza, A. M. (2002). Keyword detection in natural languages and DNA. Europhysics Letters, 57(5), 759–764.
Packalen, M. (2019). Edge factors: Scientific frontier positions of nations. Scientometrics, 118(3), 787–808.
Pérez-Angón, M. A., & Torres-Vega, G. (1994). Retos y perspectivas de la física mexicana 1989–1993. Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Física, 8(3), 119–130.
Pérez-Angón, M. A., & Torres-Vega, G. (1998). La física mexicana en perspectiva 1986–1996. Interciencia, 23(3), 163–175.
Raghavan, V. V., Deogun, J. S., & Sever, H. (1998). Introduction. Special Issue on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 397–402.
Rinia, E. J., de Lange, C., & Moed, H. F. (1993). Measuring national output in physics. Scientometrics, 28(1), 89–110.
Romo-Fernández, L. M., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). World scientific production on renewable energy, sustainability and the environment. Energy for Sustainable Development, 16(4), 500–508.
Russell, J. M., del Río, J. A., Ainsworth, S., Narváez-Berthelemot, N., & Cortés, H. D. (2007a). Collaboration in science among Latin American countries. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 30(2), 180–198.
Russell, J. M., del Río, J. A., & Cortés, H. D. (2007b). Highly visible science: A look at three decades of research from four Iberoamerican countries. Interciencia, 32(9), 629–634.
Russell, J. M., Hernández-García, Y., & Kleiche-Dray, M. (2016). Collaboration dynamics of Mexican research in Chemistry and its relationship with communication patterns. Scientometrics, 109(1), 283–316.
SCIE., Clarivate Analytics. (2018). Scope Notes;. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/scope/scope_scie/.
Tala-Ighil, R. (2016). Nanomaterials in solar cells. In M. Aliofkhazraei & A. S. H. Makhlouf (Eds.), Handbook of nanoelectrochemistry (pp. 1251–1270). Berlin: Springer.
Thilakaratne, M., Falkner, K., & Atapatuu, T. (2019). A systematic review on literature-based discovery workflow. PeerJ Computer Science, 15, e235.
Tsai, H.-H. (2012). Global data mining: An empirical study of current trends, future forecasts and technology diffusions. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 8172–8181.
Tsai, H.-H. (2013). Knowledge management vs. data mining: Research trend, forecast and citation approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 3160–3173.
Viccaro, P. J. (2014). Reflections on my tenure as Editor-in-Chief of Journal of Applied Physics. Journal of Applied Physics, 115(23), 230401.
WB, The World Bank. (2020). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS?locations=MX.
WoK., Web of knowledge. (2020). Document type. https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hs_document_type.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 13.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
del Río, J.A., Russell, J.M. & Juárez, D. Applied physics in Mexico: mining the past to predict the future. Scientometrics 125, 187–212 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03639-7
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03639-7