Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Applied physics in Mexico: mining the past to predict the future

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of the scientific output of Mexico in Applied Physics is explored from 1973 to 2017 in the Web of Science using traditional bibliometric indicators such as prolific authors and institutions; collaborating countries; journal preferences. A total of 9078 documents in the subject category of Applied Physics were retrieved and analyzed in five periods: 1973–1985, 1986–1995, 1996–2005, 2006–2010 and 2011–2017. Main findings point to an exponential increase in the production of Mexican papers over the 45 years of our study but with some slowing down in the first decade of the present century. A diversity of authors both national and foreign were identified but production found to be highly concentrated in five Mexican institutions. Journals were mainly those in basic sciences of Physics, Material Science, and Optics but with Energy and Fuels, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging appearing around the turn of the century. In a second part of the study a text mining technique is used to determine the most frequently occurring words in the abstracts of the documents from 1985 onwards. In a similar exercise the main words found in the 911 literature reviews published worldwide in the category of Applied Physics during 2014, were examined with the purpose of providing relevant information for deciding on the desired path for future Mexican research in this area. Our results suggest that national efforts in this category are aligned with international interests in nanotechnology, particularly with respect to renewable and sustainable energy resources and mainly solar energy technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. From here, we are using acronyms for all Mexican institutions, the list of these acronyms is provided in the “Appendix”.

  2. We do not show in the Table 1 the following paper types : Correction; Review-Book Chapter; Editorial Material-Book Chapter; Meeting abstract, as their contribution was insignificant or non-relevant to our study, when compared to the other document types. This explains why the totals do not correspond to the sum of the columns. The document type Note, which included Short Papers, Brief Communications, and Technical Notes, was merged with Article in 1996 (Clarivite 2020b).

References

  • Aleman Nava, G. S., Casiano Flores, V. H., Cárdenas Chávez, D. L., Díaz Chávez, R., Scarlat, N., Mahlknecht, J., et al. (2014). Renewable energy research progress in Mexico: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 32, 140–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMC, Academia Mexicana de Ciencias. (2010a). Atlas Mexicana de la Ciencia. http://atlasdelacienciamexicana.org/cienciasfisicas/pdf/fisicatabla2-22.pdf.

  • AMC, Academia Mexicana de Ciencias. (2010b). Atlas Mexicana de la Ciencia. http://atlasdelacienciamexicana.org/cienciasfisicas/pdf/fisicatabla2-18c.pdf.

  • AMC, Academia Mexicana de Ciencias. (2010c). Atlas Mexicana de la Ciencia. http://atlasdelacienciamexicana.org/cienciasfisicas/pdf/fisicatabla2-23b.pdf.

  • Anzaldo, M., Chauvet, M., & Maldonado, L. A. (2014). Fondos públicos para la investigación en nanotecnologías en México y el cambio de paradigma de la política de CTI. Interciencia, 39, 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, C., Flores, E., Martínez, M. A., & Ruiz-Martínez, M. (2019). Is there convergence in international research collaboration? An exploration at the country level in the basic and applied science fields. Scientometrics, 120, 631–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Gómez, I., Méndez, A., & Schubert, A. (1992). International co-authorship patterns in physics and its subfields, 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 24, 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Krupp, H. (1995). The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–1993. Part i. All fields combined, mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics. Scientometrics, 33, 263–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedano, K. G., Ricalde, K. F., del Río, J. A., & Martínez, M. (2014). Solar energy research in Ibero-America, a citation mining approach. Energy Procedia, 57, 930–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarivite., Clarivate Analytics. (2020a). Keywords-Plus. https://support.clarivate.com/ScientificandAcademicResearch/s/article/KeyWords-Plus-generation-creation-and-changes?language=en_US.

  • Clarivite., Clarivate Analytics. (2020b). Web-of-Science-Core-Collection-Document-Type-Note-merged-with-Article;. https://support.clarivate.com/ScientificandAcademicResearch/s/article/Web-of-Science-Core-Collection-Document-Type-Note-merged-with-Article?language=en_US.

  • Collazo-Reyes, F. (2002). Dinámica de la literatura citada en la física mexicana en el período de mayor crecimiento. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 24, 395–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collazo-Reyes, F., Herrera-Corral, G., & Baños, A. (2008). Surgimiento de la física y la investigación académica en México. Avance y Perspectiva, 1, 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collazo-Reyes, F., Pérez-Angón, M. A., & Russell, J. M. (2010). Una visión de la física mexicana. Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Física, 24, 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONACYT, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. (2014). Programa Especial de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación 2014-2018. http://www.siicyt.gob.mx/index.php/normatividad/nacional/631-3-programa-especial-de-ciencia-tecnologia-e-innovacion-2014-2018/file.

  • CONACYT, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. (2018a). Criterios Específicos de Evaluación. Área I: Físico Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Tierra.https://www.conacyt.gob.mx/index.php/el-conacyt/sistema-nacional-de-investigadores/marco-legal/criterios-sni/13714-criterios-especificos-ai/file.

  • CONACYT, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. (2018b). Programa de Redes Temáticas. https://www.conacyt.gob.mx/index.php/el-conacyt/desarrollo-cientifico/redes-tematicas-conacyt.

  • Cortés, H. D., del Río, J. A., & García, E. O. (2005). Web Implementations of Entropy-like Algorithm for Citation Mining. WSEAS Transactions on Informational Sciences and Applications, 2, 1430–1437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortés, H. D., del Río, J. A., García, E. O., & Robles, M. (2006). Web application to profiling scientific institutions through citation mining. Enformatika, 14, 419–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donner, P. (2017). Document type assignment accuracy in the journal citation index data of Web of Science. Scientometrics, 113, 219–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Vargas, X., & Collazo-Reyes, F. (2018). Diversificación geográfica de prácticas científicas y fortalecimiento de capacidades científico-técnicas locales en México, 1980–2013 / Geographic diversification of scientific practices and strengthening in local technical scientific capacities in Mexico, 1980–2013. Tla-Melaua Nueva Época, 11(43), 6–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foladori, G., Arteaga-Figueroa, E., Záyago-Lau, E., Appelbaum, R., Robles-Belmont, E., Villa, L., et al. (2015). Nanotechnology in Mexico: Key findings based on OECD criteria. Minerva, 53, 279–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frixione, E., & Laclette, J. P. (2017). Mexico’s basic science funding falls short. Science, 357, 260–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frixione, E., Ruiz-Zamarripa, L., & Hernández, G. (2016). Assessing individual intellectual output in scientific research: Mexico’s national system for evaluating scholars performance in the humanities and the behavioral sciences. PLOS ONE, 11, e0155732.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Colín, L. S. (2013). Perspectiva de la física en México. Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Física, 25, 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schlemmer, B. (2007). National research profiles in a changing Europe (1983–2003) An exploratory study of sectoral characteristics in the Triple Helix. Scientometrics, 70(2), 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., & del Río, J. A. (2001). The impact of physics research. Physics World, 14(6), 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Braun, T., Schubert, A., Toothman, D. R., & Humenik, J. A. (2000). Fullerene data mining using bibliometrics and database technology. Journal of Chemical Information and Computing Science, 40, 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., del Río, J. A., Cortés, H. D., Smith, C., Smith, A., Wagner, C., et al. (2005). The structure and infrastructure of Mexico’s science and technology. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 72(7), 798–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancho-Barrantes, B. S., & Cantú-Ortiz, F. J. (2019). Science in Mexico: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 118(2), 499–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., Rollins, J., & Yan, E. (2018). Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics, 115, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losiewicz, P., Oard, D. W., & Kostoff, R. N. (2000). Textual data mining to support science and technology management. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 15, 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzano-Agugliaro, F., Alcayde, A., Montoya, F. G., Zapata-Sierra, A., & Gil, C. (2013). Scientific production of renewable energies worldwide: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 134–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menchaca, A. (2000). Las ciencias exactas en México. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Chap. III. La física en México. Los temas y las instituciones.

  • Menchaca, A. (2001). El impulso de la física. Ciencia, octubre, 98–103.

  • Muñoz-Écija, T., Vargas-Quesada, B., & Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z. (2017). Identification and visualization of the intellectual structure and main research lines in nanoscience and nanotechnology at the worldwide level. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 19, 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2006). Gross Domestic Spending on R & D. 1981-2017;. https://data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm.

  • Ortuno, M., Carpena, P., Bernaola-Galvan, P., Muñoz, E., & Somoza, A. M. (2002). Keyword detection in natural languages and DNA. Europhysics Letters, 57(5), 759–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packalen, M. (2019). Edge factors: Scientific frontier positions of nations. Scientometrics, 118(3), 787–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Angón, M. A., & Torres-Vega, G. (1994). Retos y perspectivas de la física mexicana 1989–1993. Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Física, 8(3), 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Angón, M. A., & Torres-Vega, G. (1998). La física mexicana en perspectiva 1986–1996. Interciencia, 23(3), 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, V. V., Deogun, J. S., & Sever, H. (1998). Introduction. Special Issue on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinia, E. J., de Lange, C., & Moed, H. F. (1993). Measuring national output in physics. Scientometrics, 28(1), 89–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romo-Fernández, L. M., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). World scientific production on renewable energy, sustainability and the environment. Energy for Sustainable Development, 16(4), 500–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. M., del Río, J. A., Ainsworth, S., Narváez-Berthelemot, N., & Cortés, H. D. (2007a). Collaboration in science among Latin American countries. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 30(2), 180–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. M., del Río, J. A., & Cortés, H. D. (2007b). Highly visible science: A look at three decades of research from four Iberoamerican countries. Interciencia, 32(9), 629–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. M., Hernández-García, Y., & Kleiche-Dray, M. (2016). Collaboration dynamics of Mexican research in Chemistry and its relationship with communication patterns. Scientometrics, 109(1), 283–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCIE., Clarivate Analytics. (2018). Scope Notes;. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/scope/scope_scie/.

  • Tala-Ighil, R. (2016). Nanomaterials in solar cells. In M. Aliofkhazraei & A. S. H. Makhlouf (Eds.), Handbook of nanoelectrochemistry (pp. 1251–1270). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thilakaratne, M., Falkner, K., & Atapatuu, T. (2019). A systematic review on literature-based discovery workflow. PeerJ Computer Science, 15, e235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, H.-H. (2012). Global data mining: An empirical study of current trends, future forecasts and technology diffusions. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 8172–8181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, H.-H. (2013). Knowledge management vs. data mining: Research trend, forecast and citation approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 3160–3173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viccaro, P. J. (2014). Reflections on my tenure as Editor-in-Chief of Journal of Applied Physics. Journal of Applied Physics, 115(23), 230401.

    Google Scholar 

  • WB, The World Bank. (2020). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS?locations=MX.

  • WoK., Web of knowledge. (2020). Document type. https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hs_document_type.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Antonio del Río.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 13.

Table 13 Acronyms

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

del Río, J.A., Russell, J.M. & Juárez, D. Applied physics in Mexico: mining the past to predict the future. Scientometrics 125, 187–212 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03639-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03639-7

Keywords