Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Continuous Action Recognition Based on Sequence Alignment

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 18 November 2014

Abstract

Continuous action recognition is more challenging than isolated recognition because classification and segmentation must be simultaneously carried out. We build on the well known dynamic time warping framework and devise a novel visual alignment technique, namely dynamic frame warping (DFW), which performs isolated recognition based on per-frame representation of videos, and on aligning a test sequence with a model sequence. Moreover, we propose two extensions which enable to perform recognition concomitant with segmentation, namely one-pass DFW and two-pass DFW. These two methods have their roots in the domain of continuous recognition of speech and, to the best of our knowledge, their extension to continuous visual action recognition has been overlooked. We test and illustrate the proposed techniques with a recently released dataset (RAVEL) and with two public-domain datasets widely used in action recognition (Hollywood-1 and Hollywood-2). We also compare the performances of the proposed isolated and continuous recognition algorithms with several recently published methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. https://team.inria.fr/perception/research/car/

  2. http://perception.inrialpes.fr/datasets/Ravel/

References

  • Alameda-Pineda, X., Sanchez-Riera, J., Wienke, J., Franc, V., Cech, J., Kulkarni, K., et al. (2013). RAVEL: An annotated corpus for training robots with audiovisual abilities. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 7(1–2), 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alon, J., Athitsos, V., Yuan, Q., & Sclaroff, S. (2009). A unified framework for gesture recognition and spatiotemporal gesture segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31(9), 1685–1699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, J., & Ribeiro, E. (2007). Human motion recognition using isomap and dynamic time warping. Human motion-understanding, modeling, capture and animation (pp. 285–298). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004). Convex Optimization. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brendel, W., & Todorovic, S. (2010). Activities as time series of human postures. In N. Paragios (Ed.), Computer Vision-ECCV 2010 (pp. 721–734). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. S., Donoho, D. L., & Saunders, M. A. (2001). Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM Rev, 43(1), 129–159.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Csurka, G., Dance, C. R., Fan, L., Willamowski, J., & Bray, C. (2004). Visual categorization with bags of keypoints. In ECCV Workshop on Statistical Learning in Computer Vision.

  • Escalera, S., Gonzàlez, J., Baró, X., Reyes, M., Lopes, O., Guyon, I., Athitsos, V., & Escalante, H. J. (2013). Multi-modal gesture recognition challenge 2013: Dataset and results. In ChaLearn Multi-modal Gesture Recognition Grand Challenge and Workshop, 15th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction.

  • Evangelidis, G. D., & Psarakis, E. Z. (2008). Parametric image alignment using enhanced correlation coefficient maximization. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 30(10), 1858–1865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gales, M., & Young, S. (2008). The application of hidden Markov models in speech recognition. Foundations and Trends in Signal Processing, 1(3), 195–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, P. R., Wang, A., & Molnar, A. (2011). The in-crowd algorithm for fast basis pursuit denoising. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 59(10), 4595–4605.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, D., & Medioni, G. (2011) Dynamic manifold warping for view invariant action recognition. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, (pp. 571–578). IEEE.

  • Hienz, H., Bauer, B., & Kraiss, K. F. (1999). HMM-based continuous sign language recognition using stochastic grammars. In A. Braffort, R. Gherbi, S. Gibet, D. Teil, & J. Richardson (Eds.), Gesture-based communication in human-computer interaction (Vol. 1739, pp. 185–196)., Lecture Notes in Computer Science Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoai, M., Lan, Z. Z., & De la Torre, F. (2011). Joint segmentation and classification of human actions in video. In 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR. (pp. 3265–3272). IEEE.

  • Ikizler, N., & Duygulu, P. (2009). Histogram of oriented rectangles: A new pose descriptor for human action recognition. Image and Vision Computing, 27(10), 1515–1526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, M., Jégou, H., & Bouthémy, P. (2013). Better exploiting motion for better action recognition. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, (pp. 2555–2562). IEEE.

  • Jiang, Y. G., Dai, Q., Xue, X., Liu, W., & Ngo, C. W. (2012). Trajectory-based modeling of human actions with motion reference points. In European Conference on Computer Vision, (pp. 425–438). Berlin :Springer.

  • Kulkarni, K., Cherla, S., Kale, A., & Ramasubramanian, V. (2008). A framework for indexing human actions in video. In The 1st International Workshop on Machine Learning for Vision-based Motion Analysis-MLVMA’08.

  • Laptev, I., Marszalek, M., Schmid, C., & Rozenfeld, B. (2008) Learning realistic human actions from movies. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008. CVPR 2008, (pp. 1–8). IEEE.

  • Lee, C., & Rabiner, L. (1989). A frame-synchronous network search algorithm for connected word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 37(11), 1649–1658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, R., & Ouhyoung, M. (1998). A real-time continuous gesture recognition system for sign language. In Third IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 1998, (pp. 558–567). IEEE.

  • Lv, F., & Nevatia, R. (2006). Recognition and segmentation of 3-d human action using HMM and multi-class AdaBoost. In European Conference on Computer Vision, (pp. 359–372). Berlin: Springer.

  • Lv, F., & Nevatia, R. (2007). Single view human action recognition using key pose matching and Viterbi path searching. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007. CVPR’07, (pp. 1–8). IEEE.

  • Manning, C., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marszalek, M., Laptev, I., & Schmid, C. (2009) Actions in context. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, (pp. 2929–2936). IEEE.

  • Morency, L., Quattoni, A., & Darrell, T. (2007). Latent-dynamic discriminative models for continuous gesture recognition. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, (pp. 1–8). IEEE.

  • Mueller, M. (2007). Dynamic time warping. Information retrieval for music and motion (pp. 69–84). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ney, H. (1984). The use of a one-stage dynamic programming algorithm for connected word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 32(2), 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ney, H., & Ortmanns, S. (1999). Dynamic programming search for continuous speech recognition. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 16(5), 64–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning, H., Xu, W., Gong, Y., Huang, T. (2008). Latent pose estimator for continuous action recognition. In European Conference on Computer Vision, (pp. 419–433). Springer.

  • Rabiner, L., & Juang, B. (1993). Fundamentals of speech recognition. Salt Lake: Prentice hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakoe, H. (1979). Two-level DP-matching - a dynamic programming-based pattern matching algorithm for connected word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustic, Speech, and Signal Processing, 27(6), 588–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Riera, J., Cech, J., Horaud, R. P. (2012). Action recognition robust to background clutter by using stereo vision. In The Fourth International Workshop on Video Event Categorization, Tagging and Retrieval, LNCS: Springer.

  • Shi, Q., Wang, L., Cheng, L., & Smola, A. (2011). Discriminative human action segmentation and recognition using SMMs. IJCV, 93(1), 22–32.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sigal, L., Balan, A., & Black, M. (2010). Humaneva: Synchronized video and motion capture dataset and baseline algorithm for evaluation of articulated human motion. International Journal of Computer Vision, 87(1), 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivic, J., & Zisserman, A. (2009). Efficient visual search of videos cast as text retrieval. IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 31(4), 591–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sminchisescu, C., Kanaujia, A., & Metaxas, D. N. (2006). Conditional models for contextual human motion recognition. CVIU, 104(2–3), 210–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solmaz, B., Assari, S. M., & Shah, M. (2013). Classifying web videos using a global video descriptor. Machine vision and applications, 24(7), 1473–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starner, T., Weaver, J., & Pentland, A. (1998). Real-time american sign language recognition using desk and wearable computer based video. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(12), 1371–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tropp, J. A., & Gilbert, A. C. (2007). Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 53(12), 4655–4666.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah, M. M., Parizi, S. N,, Laptev, I. (2010). Improving bag-of-features action recognition with non-local cues. In British Machine Vision Conference. (Vol. 10, pp. 95–101).

  • Vail, D., Veloso, M., & Lafferty, J. (2007). Conditional random fields for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, (p. 235). ACM.

  • Vintsyuk, T. (1971). Element-wise recognition of continuous speech composed of words from a specified dictionary. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 7(2), 361–372.

  • Vogler, C., & Metaxas, D. (1998). ASL recognition based on a coupling between HMMs and 3D motion analysis. In Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision, (pp. 363–369).

  • Vogler, C., & Metaxas, D. (2001). A framework for recognizing the simultaneous aspects of american sign language. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 81(3), 358–384.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Schmid, C. (2013). Action recognition with improved trajectories. In International Conference on Computer Vision, (pp. 3551–3558). IEEE.

  • Young, S., Russell, N. H., & Thornton, J. (1989). Token passing: a simple conceptual model for connected speech recognition systems. Technical Report 38, University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering.

  • Young, S., Woodland, P., & Byrne, W. (1993). HTK: Hidden Markov model toolkit v1. 5. Technical Report, University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering.

  • Young, S., Evermann, G., Kershaw, D., Moore, G., Odell, J., Ollason, D., et al. (2009). The HTK book. Technical Report: University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering.

  • Zhou, F., & la Torre, F. D. (2009). Canonical time warping for alignment of human behavior. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, (pp. 2286–2294).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from the European project HUMAVIPS #247525 (2010–2013) and from the ERC Advanced Grant VHIA #340113 (2014–2019). J. Cech acknowledges support from the Czech Science Foundation Project GACR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INRIA Grenoble Rhône-Alpes, Montbonnot Saint-Martin, France

    Kaustubh Kulkarni, Georgios Evangelidis & Radu Horaud

  2. Center for Machine Perception, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

    Jan Cech

Authors
  1. Kaustubh Kulkarni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Georgios Evangelidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan Cech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Radu Horaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radu Horaud.

Additional information

Communicated by Ivan Laptev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kulkarni, K., Evangelidis, G., Cech, J. et al. Continuous Action Recognition Based on Sequence Alignment. Int J Comput Vis 112, 90–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-014-0758-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-014-0758-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation