1 Erratum to: Wireless Pers Commun DOI 10.1007/s11277-013-1128-6

Unfortunately, the two sentences mentioned below were incorrect in the original publication.

The penultimate sentence in Section 1 (Context/Motivation) should read as follows: “Results are presented in Sect. 5 firstly comparing performances when different fittingness functions are used, and secondly assessing the impact of the proposed decision-making criteria.”

The penultimate sentence in the second paragraph of Section 5.1 (Simulation Model) should read as follows: “Based on these probabilities, the average durations of the high interference state for pools #3 and #4 are 0.5 h and 2 min, respectively, while the average durations of the low interference state for pools #3 and #4 are 7.5 h and 0.5 h, respectively.”