Abstract
Wireless network technology keeps improving by solving problems detected in current systems and anticipating requirements for future systems. One of the possible approaches to help advancing wireless technology is to develop methods that help researchers understand the less desired behaviors that may occur in a real-world system. One such method is data driven multi-level analysis that uses the monitoring data collected from real-world networks to provide detailed insight, at several levels and/or scales, into the system behavior. This paper discusses data driven multi-level analysis, provides a proof of concept on how it can be applied and identifies challenges. The contributions of this paper are (1) the use of data driven multi-level analysis for understanding the behaviour of wireless networks and (2) the identification of open challenges and directions for future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The terminology depends on the field.
Open-Access Research Testbed for Next-Generation Wireless Networks (ORBIT), http://www.orbit-lab.org/.
Federation for FIRE, http://www.fed4fire.eu/testbeds.html.
References
Ammari, H. M., & Das, S. K. (2008). Integrated coverage and connectivity in wireless sensor networks: A two-dimensional percolation problem. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 57(10), 1423–1434.
Baccour, N., Koubaa, A., Mottola, L., Zuniga, M. A., Youssef, H., Boano, C. A., et al. (2012). Radio link quality estimation in wireless sensor networks: A survey. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), 8(4), 34.
Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512.
Boano, C. A., Zúñiga, M., Brown, J., Roedig, U., Keppitiyagama, C., & Römer, K. (2014). Templab: A testbed infrastructure to study the impact of temperature on wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 13th international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks (pp. 95–106). New York: IEEE Press.
Cheng, J., Adamic, L., Dow, P.A., Kleinberg, J.M., & Leskovec, J. (2014). Can cascades be predicted? In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on world wide web, (pp. 925–936). International World Wide Web Conference Steering Committee.
Dhar, V. (2013). Data science and prediction. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 64–73.
Dousse, O., Franceschetti, M., Macris, N., Meester, R., & Thiran, P. (2006). Percolation in the signal to interference ratio graph. Journal of Applied Probability, 43(2), 552–562.
Dousse, O., Franceschetti, M., & Thiran, P. (2006). On the throughput scaling of wireless relay networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(6), 2756–2761.
Franceschetti, M., & Meester, R. (2008). Random networks for communication: From statistical physics to information systems (Vol. 24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gluhak, A., Krco, S., Nati, M., Pfisterer, D., Mitton, N., & Razafindralambo, T. (2011). A survey on facilities for experimental internet of things research. IEEE on Communications Magazine, 49(11), 58–67.
González, M. C., & Barabási, A. L. (2007). Complex networks: From data to models. Nature Physics, 3(4), 224–225.
Johnson, S. C. (1967). Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 32(3), 241–254.
Kawadia, V., & Kumar, P. R. (2005). A cautionary perspective on cross-layer design. IEEE on Wireless Communications, 12(1), 3–11.
Klösgen, W., & Zytkow, J.M. (2002). The knowledge discovery process. In W. Klösgen & J. Zytkow (Eds.), Handbook of data mining and knowledge discovery, (pp. 10–21). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Lakkaraju, H., McAuley, J. J., & Leskovec, J. (2013). What’s in a name? understanding the interplay between titles, content, and communities in social media. In Proceedings of the 7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, July 8–11. Palo Alto, California: The AAAI Press.
Liu, T., & Cerpa, A. E. (2011) Foresee (4c): Wireless link prediction using link features. In 2011 10th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), (pp. 294–305). IEEE.
Liu, T., & Cerpa, A. E. (2014). Temporal adaptive link quality prediction with online learning. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 10(3), 1–41. doi:10.1145/2594766.
Mehari, M. T., De Poorter, E., Couckuyt, I., Deschrijver, D., Vanhie-Van Gerwen, J., Pareit, D., et al. (2015). Efficient global optimization of multi-parameter network problems on wireless testbeds. Ad Hoc Networks, 29, 15–31.
Penrose, M. D. (1995). Single linkage clustering and continuum percolation. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 53(1), 94–109.
Ren, W., Zhao, Q., & Swami, A. (2014). Temporal traffic dynamics improve the connectivity of ad hoc cognitive radio networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 22(1), 124–136.
Schiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. L., Young, F. W., & Carroll, J. D. (1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Academic Press.
Šolc, T., Fortuna, C., & Mohorčič, M. (2015) Low-cost testbed development and its applications in cognitive radio prototyping. In M.-G. Di Benedetto, A. Fabio Cattoni, J. Fiorina, F. Bader, & L. De Nardis (Eds.), Cognitive radio and networking for heterogeneous wireless networks, (pp. 361–405). Berlin: Springer.
Takens, F. (1981). Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Berlin: Springer.
Thomas, R. W., Friend, D. H., DaSilva, L., Mackenzie, A. B., et al. (2006). Cognitive networks: Adaptation and learning to achieve end-to-end performance objectives. IEEE on Communications Magazine, 44(12), 51–57.
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison Wesley series in behavioral science: quantitative methods. MA, United States: Addison Wesley.
Woo, A., Tong, T., & Culler, D. (2003) Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on embedded networked sensor systems, (pp. 14–27). New York: ACM.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge Tomaz Šolc for sharing the data collected by the LOG-a-TEC wireless testbed monitoring system. This work was partly funded by the European Commission H2020 program under Grant Agreement Number 688116 (eWINE project), FP7 Grant Agreement Numbers 318493 (TOPOSYS project) and 612329 (Proasense project) and the IWT SBO SAMURAI project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fortuna, C., De Poorter, E., Škraba, P. et al. Data Driven Wireless Network Design: A Multi-level Modeling Approach. Wireless Pers Commun 88, 63–77 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3242-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3242-8