Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Emotional consensus in group decision making

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mind & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a theory and computational model of the role of emotions in group decision making. After reviewing the role of emotions in individual decision making, it describes social and psychological mechanisms by which emotional and other information is transmitted between individuals. The processes by which these mechanisms can contribute to group consensus are modeled computationally using a program, HOTCO 3, which has been used to simulate simple cases of emotion-based group decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes A, Thagard P (1997) Empathy and analogy. Dialogue Can Philos 36:705–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsade S (2002) The ripple effect: emotional contagion in group behavior. Admin Sci Q 47:644–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchette I, Dunbar K (2001) Analogy use in naturalistic settings: the influence of audience, emotion, and goals. Mem Cogn 29:730–735

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio AR (1994) Descartes’ error. G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ephrati E, Rosenschein JS (1996) Deriving consensus in multiagent systems. Artif Intell 87:21–74

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Finucane ML, Alhakami AS, Slovic P, Johnson SM (2000) The affect heuristic in judgements of risks and benefit. Behav Decis Making 13:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield E, Cacioppo JT, Rapson RL (1994) Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak KJ, Thagard P (1989) Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cogn Sci 13:295–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NR, Feinberg WE (1989) Crowd structure and process: theoretical framework and computer simulation model. In: Lawler E, Markovsky B (eds) Advances in group processes, vol 6. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 49–86

  • Kunda Z, Thagard P (1996) Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: a parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychol Rev 103:284–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner JS, Small DA, Loewenstein GF (2004) Heart strings and purse strings: carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychol Sci 15:337–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull 127:267–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Machamer P, Darden L, Craver CF (2000) Thinking about mechanisms. Philos Sci 67:1–25

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Millgram E, Thagard P (1996) Deliberative coherence. Synthese 108:63–88

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moss S (2002) Challenges for agent-based social simulation of multilateral negotiation. In: Dautenhaum K, Bond A, Canamero L, Edmonds B (eds) Socially intelligent agents: creating relationships with computers and robots. Kluwer, Norwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard P (2000) Coherence in thought and action. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard P (2003) Why wasn’t O. J. convicted? Emotional coherence in legal inference. Cogn Emotion 17:361–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard P (2005) The emotional coherence of religion. J Cogn Cult 5:58–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard P, Millgram E (1995) Inference to the best plan: a coherence theory of decision. In: Ram A, Leake DB (eds) Goal-driven learning. MIT, Cambridge, pp 439–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard P, Shelley CP (2001) Emotional analogies and analogical inference. In: Gentner D, Holyoak KH, Kokinov BK (eds) The analogical mind: perspectives from cognitive science. MIT, Cambridge, pp 335–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagar BM, Thagard P (2004) Spiking Phineas Gage: a neurocomputational theory of cognitive-affective integration in decision making. Psychol Rev 111:67–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge M (2002) An introduction to multiagent systems. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We are grateful to an anonymous referee for very helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 3G1

    Paul Thagard

  2. School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 3G1

    Fred W. Kroon

Authors
  1. Paul Thagard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fred W. Kroon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Thagard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thagard, P., Kroon, F.W. Emotional consensus in group decision making. Mind & Society 5, 85–104 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-006-0011-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-006-0011-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation