Abstract
The present work analyses the effect of three spatial filters, modelling the psychophysics data on brightness perception, when applied to a difficult computer vision problem. This pertains to the automatic grain-matrix segmentation of cross-polar images of sedimentary rock thin sections, gathered through petrographic microscopy. These three filters are assumed to be modelling three modes of vision, viz. vision-at-a-glance (VG, through Magnocellular or M channel in primate visual pathway), vision-in-strong-contrast mode (VSC, through Parvocellular or P channel of visual pathway), and vision-with-scrutiny (VS, through Magno-Parvochannels combined referred as the PM filter). The aforementioned biologically inspired filters related to brightness–contrast modelling are applied on the cross-polar microscopic images. Then binary segmentation is performed on the original, as well as the filtered, images using a k-means clustering algorithm which effectively segment the input images according to the homogeneity present. The binary segmented output when compared with our manually built grain-matrix segmented ground truth using suitable indices, forecasts noticeable difference in terms of the applied filter on them and the grain size distribution in that image, manifested sometimes by the resolution scale of capturing the image. Mostly for images with higher resolution of microscope lens while capturing, or for images displaying larger grain size, the PM filtered image has shown better grain-matrix segmentation, though the effect of filtering is not very pronounced for such images. On the other hand, for lower resolution of microscope lens for capturing the image or for smaller grain size featured images, the P filtered image has consistently shown more accurate grain-matrix aggregation result as also distinct improvement over those not filtered. The novelty of the approach lies in the application of a psychophysics model that attempts to mimic the manual segmentation performed by the trained eye of the expert in various visual modes. The proposed method achieves a reasonably higher accuracy in grain segmentation when compared with relevant existing methods especially while dealing with more difficult images containing many small-sized grains.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Dias B, Fernandez V, Victor L, Rodrigo S, José Y (2020) Petrographic microscope digital image processing technique for texture and microstructure interpretation of earth materials. Earth Sci Res 9(1):58
Mokhles M, Fatai A, Mohammed M (2019) Advances in rock petrography: image processing techniques for automated textural thin section analysis. In: Proceedings of SPE middle east oil and gas show and conference, Manama, Bahrain, March 2019. ISBN: 978–1–61399–639–3
Maitre J, Kévin Bouchard L, Bédard P (2019) Mineral grains recognition using computer vision and machine learning. Comput Geosci 130:84–93
Budennyy S, Pachezhertsev A, Bukharev A, Erofeev A, Mitrushkin D, Belozerov B (2017) Image processing and machine learning approaches for petrographic thin section analysis. In: Proceedings of SPE Russian petroleum technology conference, Moscow, Russia, October 2017. ISBN: 978–1–61399–587–7
Heilbronner R (2000) Automatic grain boundary detection and grain size analysis using polarization micrographs or orientation images. J Struct Geol 22(7):969–981
Gorsevski PV, Onasch CM, Farver JR, Ye X (2012) Detecting grain boundaries in deformed rocks using a cellular automata approach. Comput Geosci 42:136–142
Lu B, Cui M, Wang Y et al (2009) Automated grain boundary detection using the level set method. Comput Geosci 35(2):267–275
Jungmann M, Pape H, Wißkirchen P, Clauser C, Berlage T (2014) Segmentation of thin section images for grain size analysis using region competition and edge weighted region merging. Comput Geosci 72:33–48
Yesiloglu-Gultekin N, Keceli AS, Sezer EA, Can AB, Gokceoglu C, Bayhan H (2012) A computer program (TSecSoft) to determine mineral percentages using photographs obtained from thin sections. Comput Geosci 46:310–316
Izadi H, Sadri J, Mehran N-A (2015) A new intelligent method for minerals segmentation in thin sections based on a novel incremental color clustering. Comput Geosci 81:38–52
Izadi H, Sadri J, Bayati M (2017) An intelligent system for mineral identification in thin sections based on a cascade approach. Comput Geosci 99:37–49
Izadi H, Sadri J, Hormozzade F, Fattahpour V (2020) Altered mineral segmentation in thin sections using an incremental-dynamic clustering algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 90:103466
Jiang F, Gu Q, Hao H, Li N (2017) Grain segmentation of multi-angle petrographic thin section microscopic images. IEEE ICIP Proc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2017.8297009
Jiang F, Qing Gu, HuizhenHao NL (2018) A method for automatic grain segmentation of multi-angle cross-polarized microscopic images of sandstone. Comput Geosci 115:143–153
Das R, Shankar BU, Chakraborty T, Ghosh K (2020) Addressing grain-matrix differentiation in sedimentary rock photomicrographs in the light of brightness perception modelling. In: Mandal J, Mukhopadhyay S. (eds) Proceedings of the global ai congress 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1112. Springer, Singapore
Kingdom FAA (2011) Lightness, brightness, and transparency: a quarter century of new ideas, captivating demonstrations and unrelenting controversy. Vision Res 51:652–673
Helson H (1963) Studies of anomalous contrast and assimilation. J Opt SocAm 53:179–184
Jameson D, Hurvich LM (1989) Essay concerning color constancy. Ann Rev Psych 40:1–22
Blakeslee B, McCourt ME (2004) A unified theory of brightness contrast and assimilation incorporating oriented multiscale spatial filtering and contrast normalization. Vis Res 44:2483–2503
Ghosh K (2012) A possible role and basis of visual pathway selection in brightness induction. Seeing Perceiving 25(2):179–212
Ghosh K (2016) A neural networkbased model of M and P LGN cells, 2016. In: IEEE proceedings, bioinformatics and systems biology (bsb), international conference on, 1–5, Allahabad, India, 2016
Wei H, Wang L, Wang S, Jiang Y, Li J (2020) A signal-processing neural model based on biological retina. Electronics 9(1):35–45
Wei H (2016) A bio-inspired integration method for object semantic representation. J Artif Intell Soft Comput 6:137–154
Hochstein S, Ahissar M (2002) View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 36:791–804
Merigan WH, Maunsell JRH (1993) How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Ann Rev Neurosci 16:369–402
Bowker DO (1983) Suprathreshold spatiotemporal response characteristics of the human visual system. J Opt Soc Am 73:436–440
Maunsell JH, Nealey TA, DePriest DD (1990) Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to responses in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 10:3323–3334
Bullier J (2001) Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Res Rev 36:96–107
De Valois RL, De Valois KK (1988) Spatial vision. Oxford University Press, New York
Arthur D, Vassilvitskii S (2006) k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding. Technical report, Stanford
MacQueen J (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proc Fifth Berk Symp Math Stat Probab 1(14):281–297
Pal SK, Ghosh A, Uma Shankar B (2000) Segmentation of remotely sensed images with fuzzy thresholding, and quantitative evaluation. Int J Remote Sens 21(11):2269–2300
Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(1):62–66
Sahoo P, Wilkins C, Yeager J (1997) Threshold selection using Renyi’s entropy. Pattern Recogn 30(1):71–84
Ojha RK (2018) Bio-inspired networks: from DoG to CNN, M. Tech.(CS) Dissertation, Indian Statistical Institute, http://library.isical.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/10263/6948
Fränti P, Sieranoja S (2019) How much can k-means be improved by using better initialization and repeats? Pattern Recogn 93:95–112
Acknowledgements
K Ghosh would like to acknowledge the funding provided by Cognitive Science Research Initiative (CSRI/307/2016), DST, Government of India. The authors also acknowledge the sincere and active support received from all colleagues in the Geological Studies Unit, ISI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Das, R., Shankar, B.U., Chakraborty, T. et al. Automatic grain segmentation in cross-polarized photomicrographs of sedimentary rocks using psychophysics inspired models. Innovations Syst Softw Eng 17, 167–183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-021-00400-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-021-00400-y