Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Automatic grain segmentation in cross-polarized photomicrographs of sedimentary rocks using psychophysics inspired models

  • S.I. : ARIIS
  • Published:
Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work analyses the effect of three spatial filters, modelling the psychophysics data on brightness perception, when applied to a difficult computer vision problem. This pertains to the automatic grain-matrix segmentation of cross-polar images of sedimentary rock thin sections, gathered through petrographic microscopy. These three filters are assumed to be modelling three modes of vision, viz. vision-at-a-glance (VG, through Magnocellular or M channel in primate visual pathway), vision-in-strong-contrast mode (VSC, through Parvocellular or P channel of visual pathway), and vision-with-scrutiny (VS, through Magno-Parvochannels combined referred as the PM filter). The aforementioned biologically inspired filters related to brightness–contrast modelling are applied on the cross-polar microscopic images. Then binary segmentation is performed on the original, as well as the filtered, images using a k-means clustering algorithm which effectively segment the input images according to the homogeneity present. The binary segmented output when compared with our manually built grain-matrix segmented ground truth using suitable indices, forecasts noticeable difference in terms of the applied filter on them and the grain size distribution in that image, manifested sometimes by the resolution scale of capturing the image. Mostly for images with higher resolution of microscope lens while capturing, or for images displaying larger grain size, the PM filtered image has shown better grain-matrix segmentation, though the effect of filtering is not very pronounced for such images. On the other hand, for lower resolution of microscope lens for capturing the image or for smaller grain size featured images, the P filtered image has consistently shown more accurate grain-matrix aggregation result as also distinct improvement over those not filtered. The novelty of the approach lies in the application of a psychophysics model that attempts to mimic the manual segmentation performed by the trained eye of the expert in various visual modes. The proposed method achieves a reasonably higher accuracy in grain segmentation when compared with relevant existing methods especially while dealing with more difficult images containing many small-sized grains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Dias B, Fernandez V, Victor L, Rodrigo S, José Y (2020) Petrographic microscope digital image processing technique for texture and microstructure interpretation of earth materials. Earth Sci Res 9(1):58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mokhles M, Fatai A, Mohammed M (2019) Advances in rock petrography: image processing techniques for automated textural thin section analysis. In: Proceedings of SPE middle east oil and gas show and conference, Manama, Bahrain, March 2019. ISBN: 978–1–61399–639–3

  3. Maitre J, Kévin Bouchard L, Bédard P (2019) Mineral grains recognition using computer vision and machine learning. Comput Geosci 130:84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Budennyy S, Pachezhertsev A, Bukharev A, Erofeev A, Mitrushkin D, Belozerov B (2017) Image processing and machine learning approaches for petrographic thin section analysis. In: Proceedings of SPE Russian petroleum technology conference, Moscow, Russia, October 2017. ISBN: 978–1–61399–587–7

  5. Heilbronner R (2000) Automatic grain boundary detection and grain size analysis using polarization micrographs or orientation images. J Struct Geol 22(7):969–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gorsevski PV, Onasch CM, Farver JR, Ye X (2012) Detecting grain boundaries in deformed rocks using a cellular automata approach. Comput Geosci 42:136–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lu B, Cui M, Wang Y et al (2009) Automated grain boundary detection using the level set method. Comput Geosci 35(2):267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jungmann M, Pape H, Wißkirchen P, Clauser C, Berlage T (2014) Segmentation of thin section images for grain size analysis using region competition and edge weighted region merging. Comput Geosci 72:33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yesiloglu-Gultekin N, Keceli AS, Sezer EA, Can AB, Gokceoglu C, Bayhan H (2012) A computer program (TSecSoft) to determine mineral percentages using photographs obtained from thin sections. Comput Geosci 46:310–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Izadi H, Sadri J, Mehran N-A (2015) A new intelligent method for minerals segmentation in thin sections based on a novel incremental color clustering. Comput Geosci 81:38–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Izadi H, Sadri J, Bayati M (2017) An intelligent system for mineral identification in thin sections based on a cascade approach. Comput Geosci 99:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Izadi H, Sadri J, Hormozzade F, Fattahpour V (2020) Altered mineral segmentation in thin sections using an incremental-dynamic clustering algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 90:103466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang F, Gu Q, Hao H, Li N (2017) Grain segmentation of multi-angle petrographic thin section microscopic images. IEEE ICIP Proc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2017.8297009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang F, Qing Gu, HuizhenHao NL (2018) A method for automatic grain segmentation of multi-angle cross-polarized microscopic images of sandstone. Comput Geosci 115:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Das R, Shankar BU, Chakraborty T, Ghosh K (2020) Addressing grain-matrix differentiation in sedimentary rock photomicrographs in the light of brightness perception modelling. In: Mandal J, Mukhopadhyay S. (eds) Proceedings of the global ai congress 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1112. Springer, Singapore

  16. Kingdom FAA (2011) Lightness, brightness, and transparency: a quarter century of new ideas, captivating demonstrations and unrelenting controversy. Vision Res 51:652–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Helson H (1963) Studies of anomalous contrast and assimilation. J Opt SocAm 53:179–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jameson D, Hurvich LM (1989) Essay concerning color constancy. Ann Rev Psych 40:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Blakeslee B, McCourt ME (2004) A unified theory of brightness contrast and assimilation incorporating oriented multiscale spatial filtering and contrast normalization. Vis Res 44:2483–2503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghosh K (2012) A possible role and basis of visual pathway selection in brightness induction. Seeing Perceiving 25(2):179–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghosh K (2016) A neural networkbased model of M and P LGN cells, 2016. In: IEEE proceedings, bioinformatics and systems biology (bsb), international conference on, 1–5, Allahabad, India, 2016

  22. Wei H, Wang L, Wang S, Jiang Y, Li J (2020) A signal-processing neural model based on biological retina. Electronics 9(1):35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wei H (2016) A bio-inspired integration method for object semantic representation. J Artif Intell Soft Comput 6:137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hochstein S, Ahissar M (2002) View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 36:791–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Merigan WH, Maunsell JRH (1993) How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Ann Rev Neurosci 16:369–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bowker DO (1983) Suprathreshold spatiotemporal response characteristics of the human visual system. J Opt Soc Am 73:436–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maunsell JH, Nealey TA, DePriest DD (1990) Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to responses in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 10:3323–3334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bullier J (2001) Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Res Rev 36:96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. De Valois RL, De Valois KK (1988) Spatial vision. Oxford University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Arthur D, Vassilvitskii S (2006) k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding. Technical report, Stanford

  31. MacQueen J (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proc Fifth Berk Symp Math Stat Probab 1(14):281–297

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Pal SK, Ghosh A, Uma Shankar B (2000) Segmentation of remotely sensed images with fuzzy thresholding, and quantitative evaluation. Int J Remote Sens 21(11):2269–2300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(1):62–66

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Sahoo P, Wilkins C, Yeager J (1997) Threshold selection using Renyi’s entropy. Pattern Recogn 30(1):71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ojha RK (2018) Bio-inspired networks: from DoG to CNN, M. Tech.(CS) Dissertation, Indian Statistical Institute, http://library.isical.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/10263/6948

  36. Fränti P, Sieranoja S (2019) How much can k-means be improved by using better initialization and repeats? Pattern Recogn 93:95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

K Ghosh would like to acknowledge the funding provided by Cognitive Science Research Initiative (CSRI/307/2016), DST, Government of India. The authors also acknowledge the sincere and active support received from all colleagues in the Geological Studies Unit, ISI.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuntal Ghosh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, R., Shankar, B.U., Chakraborty, T. et al. Automatic grain segmentation in cross-polarized photomicrographs of sedimentary rocks using psychophysics inspired models. Innovations Syst Softw Eng 17, 167–183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-021-00400-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-021-00400-y

Keywords