Abstract
Böckenholt and van der Heijden’s results regarding compliance with insurance regulations—that the enforcement activities of a regulatory agency were relatively unpredictive of compliance—are consistent with findings from other domains (e.g., tax adherence), where personal factors and informal social controls have been shown to play a more significant role. However, the specific form of informal social control investigated in Böckenholt and van der Heijden’s study (the perceived approval/disapproval of friends and family) is not the only kind of informal social control that has proven effective in spurring compliance. Descriptive social norms, which involve perceptions not of what others approve but of what others actually do, also influence compliance decisions powerfully. Yet, the role of descriptive social norms in rule adherence is often underappreciated by governed and governors alike. The consequences of this relative lack of recognition are discussed within the arena of compliance with pro-environmental regulations and requests.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brehm, S.S., & Brehm, J.W. (1981). Psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
Bryan, J.H., & Test, M.A. (1967). Models and helping: Naturalistic studies in aiding behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 400–407.
Burgoon, M., Alvaro, E., Grandpre, J., & Voulodakis, M. (2002). Revisiting the theory of psychological reactance. In J. P. Dillard, & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook (pp. 195–211). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cialdini, R.B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Cialdini, R.B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105–109.
Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., & Kallgren, C.A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
Goldstein, N., Cialdini, R.B., & Griskevicius, V. (submitted). A room with a viewpoint: Using norm-based appeals to motivate conservation behaviors in a hotel setting.
Kahan, D. (1997). Social influence, social meaning, and deterrence. Virginia Law Review, 83, 349–395.
Larimer, M.E., & Neigbors, C. (2003). Normative misperception and the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms on college student gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behavior, 17, 235–243.
Le Bon, G. (1895/1960). Psychologie des foules (Psychology of the crowd). New York: Viking Press.
MacKay, C. (1841/1932). Popular delusions and the madness of crowds. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Milgram, S., Bickman, L., & Berkowitz, L. (1969). Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 79–82.
Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal report on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
Roth, J.A., & Scholz, J.T. (Eds.) (1989). Taxpayer compliance: Social science perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Schultz, P.W., Nolan, J.M., Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N., & Griskevicius, V. (in press). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science.
Van Empelen, P., Schaalma, H.P., Kok, G., & Jansen, M.R.J. (2001). Predicting condom use with casual and steady partners among drug users. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 16, 293–305.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cialdini, R.B. Descriptive Social Norms as Underappreciated Sources of Social Control. Psychometrika 72, 263–268 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1560-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1560-6