Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Reply to the editorial “Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment?” written by Prof. Finkbeiner (Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(2):266–271)

  • LETTER TO THE EDITORS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 17 December 2013

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Flash Eurobarometer on Attitudes of Europeans towards building the single market for green products (http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/flash_arch_374_361_en.htm#367)

  2. Information underlying this analysis can be found in the Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission Communication Building the Single Market for Green Products, Commission Staff Working Paper (2013) 111

  3. European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Analysis of Existing Environmental Footprint Methodologies for Products and Organisations: Recommendations, Rationale, and Alignment. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/pdf/Deliverable.pdf

  4. For more information on the European Environmental Footprint pilot phase, please visit the website: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/index.htm

  5. For details on how to register, see http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/pdf/Wiki_reginstr.pdf

References

  • ADEME (2011) General principles for an environmental communication on mass market products BPX 30-323-0. Available online at http://www2.ademe.fr/servlet/getDoc?id=38480&m=3&cid=96

  • EC-JRC (2010a) Analysis of existing environmental impact assessment methodologies for use in life cycle assessment—background document. ILCD Handbook—International Reference Life Cycle Data System, European Union

  • EC-JRC (2010b) Framework and requirements for LCIA models and indicators. ILCD Handbook—International Reference Life Cycle Data System, European Union

  • EC-JRC (2011) Recommendations based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors for life cycle assessment in European context. ILCD Handbook—International Reference Life Cycle Data System, European Union

  • Finkbeiner M (2014) Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(2):266–271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R, Steiner R, Braunschweig A, Egli N, Hildesheimer G (2006) Swiss ecological scarcity method: the new version 2006. Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Harremoës P, Gee D, MacGarvin M, Stirling A, Keys J, Wynne B, Guedes Vaz S (eds) (2001) Late lessons from early warnings: The precautionary principle 1896–2000. Environmental issue report No 22. European Environment Agency, Luxembourg, Retrieved from http://www.iss.it/binary/saan/cont/Issue_Report_No_22.1127378189.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild MZ, Goedkoop M, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, Margni M, De Schryver A, Humbert S, Laurent A, Sala S, Pant R (2013) Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(3):683–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milà i Canals L, Chenoweth J, Chapagain A, Orr S, Antón A, Clift R (2009) Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA: part I—inventory modelling and characterisation factors for the main impact pathways. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(1):28–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant R, Van Hoof G, Schowanek D, Feijtel TCJ, de Koning A, Hauschild MZ, Pennington DW, Olsen SI, Rosenbaum R (2004) Comparison between three different LCIA methods for aquatic ecotoxicity and a product environmental risk assessment—insights from a detergent case study within OMNIITOX. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(5):295–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • PAS 2050 (2011) Specifications for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institution (BSI), London, Available online at http://www.bsigroup.com/en/Standards-and-Publications/How-we-can-help-you/Professional-Standards-Service/PAS-2050/

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43(11):4098–4104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ridoutt BG, Pfister S (2010) A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity. Glob Environ Chang 20(1):113–120

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Directorate General for the Environment (DG ENV), European Commission, Avenue de Beaulieu 5, 1160, Brussels, Belgium

    Michele Galatola

  2. Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra, Italy

    Rana Pant

Authors
  1. Michele Galatola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rana Pant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Galatola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galatola, M., Pant, R. Reply to the editorial “Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment?” written by Prof. Finkbeiner (Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(2):266–271). Int J Life Cycle Assess 19, 1356–1360 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0740-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0740-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation