Abstract
We describe the design of a knowledge-building environment and examine the role of knowledge-building portfolios in characterizing and scaffolding collaborative inquiry. Our goal is to examine collaborative knowledge building in the context of exploring the alignment of learning, collaboration, and assessment in computer forums. The key design principle involved turning over epistemic agency to students; guided by several knowledge-building principles, they were asked to identify clusters of computer notes that indicated knowledge-building episodes in the computer discourse. Three classes of 9th grade students in Hong Kong used Knowledge Forum in several conditions: Knowledge Forum only, Knowledge Forum with portfolios, and Knowledge Forum with portfolios and principles. Results showed: (1) Students working on portfolios guided knowledge-building principles showed deeper inquiry and more conceptual understanding than their counterpart (2) Students' knowledge-building discourse, reflected in portfolio scores, contributed to their domain understanding; and (3) Knowledge-building portfolios helped to assess and foster collective knowledge advances: A portfolio with multiple contributions from students is a group accomplishment that captures the distributed and progressive nature of knowledge building. Students extended their collective understanding by analyzing the discourse, and the portfolio scaffolded the complex interactions between individual and collective knowledge advancements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. D., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271–311.
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1989). International Learning as a goal of instruction. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.) Knowing, learning and instruction. Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361–392). Hillsdale, NJ: Zilbaun.
Black, P. & Dylan, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Educational Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 7–74.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.
Brown, A. L. & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Dugid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
Burtis, J. (1998). Analytic Toolkit for Knowledge Forum. Centre for Applied Cognitive Science: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto.
Chan, C. K. K. (2001). Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in processing incompatible information. Instructional Science, 29, 443–479.
Chan, C., Burtis, J. & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 1–40.
Chan, C. K. K. & van Aalst, J. (2003). Assessing and scaffolding knowledge building: Pedagogical knowledge building principles and electronic portfolios. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 21–30). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Chan, C. K. K. & van Aalst, J. (2004). Learning, assessment and collaboration in computer-supported environments. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirchner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education (pp. 87–112). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Chi, M. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271–315.
Collins, A., Joseph, D. & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 15–42.
Dillenbourg, P., Eurelings, A. & Hakkarainen, K. (Eds.) (2001). Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Maastricht, The Netherlands: McLuhan Institute.
Edelson, D. C., Pea, R. D. & Gomez, L. M. (1996). The collaboratory notebook: Support for collaboratory inquiry. Communications of the ACM, 39, 32–33.
Gipps, C. V. (2002). Sociocultural perspectives on assessment. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century (pp. 73–83). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Guzdial, M. & Turns, J. (2000). Computer-supported collaborative learning in engineering: The challenge of scaling up assessment. In M. J. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advances designs for technology in learning (pp. 227–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L. & Järvelä, S. (2002). Epistemology of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 11–41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hewitt, J. (2003). How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28, 31–45.
Koschmann, T., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (Eds.) (2002). CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A. & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfall for social interactions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335–353.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J. & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 487–509.
Oshima, J., Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1996). Collaborative learning processes associated with high and low conceptual progress. Instructional Science, 24, 125–155.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L. & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and the three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557–577.
Palonen, T. & Hakkarainen, K. (2000). Patterns of interaction in computer-supported learning: A social network analysis. In B. Fishman & S. O'Connor-Divelbliss (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 334–339). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reeve, T. C. (2000). Alternative assessment approaches for online learning environments in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 101–111.
Salomon, G. (Ed.) (1993). Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265–283.
Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge Building. In Encyclopedia of education, Second edition. New York: Macmillan Reference. pp. 1370–1373.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C. & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE Project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In K. McGilley (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R. S., Swallow,J. & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 51–68.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors of learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13.
Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29, 1–14.
Stahl, G. (Ed.) (2002). Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of CSCL 2002. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stahl, G. (2004). Building collaborative knowing. In P. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education (pp. 53–85). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
van Aalst, J. (2006). Rethinking the nature of online work in asynchronous learning networks. British Journal of Educational Technology.
van Aalst, J. & Chan, C. K. K. (2001). Beyond “sitting next to each other”: A design experiment on knowledge building in teacher education. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 20–28), Maastricht, The Netherlands: University of Maastricht.
van Aalst, J. & Chan, C. K. K. (in press). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building through electronic portfolio. The Journal of the Learning Sciences.
Vye, N. J., Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., Barron, B. J., Zech, L. & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1998). SMART environment that support monitoring, reflection and revision. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 305–346). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
White, B. Y., Shimoda, T. A. & Fredericksen, J. R. (1999). Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: Computer support for metacognitive development. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 151–182.
Wolf, D., Bixby, J., Glenn, J. & Gardner, H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17, 31–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-8997-6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, E.Y.C., Chan, C.K.K. & van Aalst, J. Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. Computer Supported Learning 1, 57–87 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-6844-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-6844-4