Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Participation and common knowledge in a case study of student blogging

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interaction between participation and the emergence of common knowledge is the subject matter of this paper. A case study of a single class provides the focal point of analysis. During the semester the students participated in a blogging activity. As a result of their participation, the students create and distribute knowledge. The online efforts of the students can be described as participation in both a discourse and knowledge community. At one level, blogging is an activity composed of writing, reading, and commenting, and at a second level, the students share their thoughts in their own voices. At a third level, over the course of the semester, the student posts and commentary form a commons of information that can be mined later in the semester for other kinds of learning activities. Knowledge creation, distribution, and accumulation are analyzed in terms of student participation at both the level of individual events and from the perspective of an ongoing community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Agre, P., & Chapman, D (1990). What are plans for? Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 6(1), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alterman, R., & Garland, A (2001). Convention in joint activity. Cognitive Science, 25(4), 611–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alterman, R., & Larusson, J. (2009). Modeling participation within a community. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1680–1685).

  • Alterman, R., & Larusson, J. (2010). Collaborative sensemaking in the blogosphere. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

  • Alterman, R., & Larusson, J. (2011). Students producing thick descriptions. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning.

  • Althaus, S. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions. Communication Education, 46, 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amer, A. (1994). The effect of knowledge-map and underlining training on the reading comprehension of scientific texts. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to learn. In R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 31–63). Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. (2006). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for the learning scientist. The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (p. 169).

  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale Univ Pr.

  • Betts, J. D. & Glogoff, S. J. (2004). Instructional models for using weblogs in e-learning: A case study from a virtual and hybrid course. Syllabus 2004 Conference, San Francisco, CA. volume 21.

  • Beuchot, A., & Bullen, M. (2005). Interaction and interpersonality in online discussion forums. Distance Education, 26(1), 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blom, J.-P., & Gumperz, J. (1986). Social meaning in linguistic structure: Code-switching in Norway. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R. (2002). The weblog handbook: Practical advice on creating and maintaining your blog. Basic Books.

  • Brown, A. L. (1981). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from text. In M. L. Kamil (Ed.), Directions in reading: Research and instruction. Thirtieth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 21-43).

  • Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. Salomon, G. (Ed.) Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188-228). Cambridge University Press.

  • Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (2002). The social life of information. Harvard Business School Press.

  • Bruckman, A. (1998). Community support for constructionist learning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 7(1), 47–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Harvard University Press.

  • Cameron, D., & Anderson, T. (2006). Comparing weblogs to threaded discussion tools in online educational contexts. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(11), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M., & VanLehn, K. (1991). The content of physics self-explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 69–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H., & Brennan, S. (1991). Grounding in communication. In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 127–149).

  • Clark, H., & Marshall, C. (2002). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. Josh, B. Webber, I. Sag (Eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding (pp. 10–63). Cambridge University Press.

  • Clark, H., & Schaefer, E. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive science, 13(2), 259–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational researcher, 32(1), 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (2006). Cognitive apprenticeship: The cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, R. Keith Sawyer. Cambridge University Press.

  • Collins, A., & Brown, J. (1988). The Computer as a Tool for Learning through Reflection. In H. Mandl & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 1–18). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

  • Collins, A., Brown, J., Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davi, A., Frydenberg, M., Gulati, G. (2007). Blogging across the disciplines: Integrating technology to enhance liberal learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 222–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deitering, A., & Huston, S. (2004). Weblogs and the Middle Spacefor Learning. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(4), 273–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, L., & Yuen, A. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers and Education, 56(2), 441–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series (p. 1–19). Elsevier Science.

  • Du, H., & Wagner, C. (2005). Learning with weblogs: An empirical investigation. In System Sciences, 2005. hicss’05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 7b–7b).

  • Duffy, P. (2008). Engaging the YouTube Google-eyed generation: Strategies for using Web 20 in teaching and learning. The Electronic Journal e-Learning Volume 6(2), 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N., & Wu, Y. (2008). Blogging in the classroom: A preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact on comprehension. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdig, R., & Trammell, K. (2004). Content delivery in the ‘Blogosphere’. The Journal (Technological Horizons In Education), 31(7), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2006). From Wikipedia to the classroom: Exploring online publication and learning. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences (pp. 182–188).

  • Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2007). Constructing text: Wiki as a toolkit for (collaborative?) learning. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Wikis (pp. 31–42).

  • Garfinkel, H. (1994). Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press.

  • Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The Interpretation of Culture. Basic Books.

  • Glogoff, S. (2005). Instructional blogging: Promoting interactivity, student-centered learning, and peer input. Innovate. Journal of Online Education, 1(5).

  • Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 437–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Hodder Arnold.

  • Hodkinson, P. (2007). Interactive online journals and individualization. New Media & Society, 9, 625–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1964). Introduction: Toward Ethnographies of Communication. American Anthropologist, 66(6 PART2), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. (2008). The phenomenon of blogs and theoretical model of blog use in educational contexts. Computers and Education, 51(3), 1342–1352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T. (2002). Dewey’s contribution to the foundations of CSCL research. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (pp. 17–22).

  • Koschmann, T., Kelson, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., Barrows, H. S. (1996). Computer-supported problem-based learning: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. In T. E. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 83–124). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

  • Lara, C., & Lomicka, L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larusson, J. (2010). Supporting the “collaborative” part of wiki-mediated collaborative learning activities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brandeis University.

  • Larusson, J., & Alterman, R. (2007). Tracking online collaborative work as representational practice: Analysis and Tool. In Communities and Technologies 2007: Proceedings of the Third Communities and Technologies Conference, Michigan State University 2007 (pp. 245–264).

  • Larusson, J., & Alterman, R. (2009). Wikis to support the “collaborative” part of collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 371–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. (2001). Mutual knowledge, background knowledge and shared beliefs: Their roles in establishing common ground. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(1), 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology. White Plains, NY: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1969). Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, N., & Koschmann, T. (2002). Realizations of cscl conversations: Technology transfer and the csile project. In Cscl (vol. 2, pp. 3–10).

  • Mortensen, T., & Walker, J. (2002). Blogging thoughts: Personal publication as an online research tool. In A. Morrison (Ed.), Researching ICTs in Context. Oslo, Norway: InterMedia Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B., Schiano, D., Gumbrecht, M., Swartz, L. (2004). Why we blog. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, K. (2001). Contextualization and the negotiation of social identities in a geographically distributed situated learning project. Linguistics and Education, 12(3), 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oravec, J. A. (2002). Bookmarking the World: Weblog applications in education. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(7), 616–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I., Harel, S., Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1–11). Ablex Publishing.

  • Pena-Shaff, J., Altman, W., Stephenson, H. (2005). Asynchronous online discussions as a tool for learning: Students’ attitudes, expectations, and perceptions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(4), 409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1998). Interactivity on the nets. In F., Sudweeks, M., McLaughlin, S., Rafaeli (Eds.), Network and Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet (pp. 173-189). MIT Press.

  • Ryle, G. (1968). The thinking of thoughts: What is ‘Le Penseur’ doing? University Lectures, no. 18.

  • Ryle, G. (1971). The thinking of thoughts: What is le penseur doing. Collected papers, 2, 480–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. (2002). Mirror, mirror, on my screen... Exploring online reflections. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97–118). Cambridge University Press.

  • Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (1975). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1245–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., McLaren, B. (2010). Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 43–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Franscisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational researcher, 27(2), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sim, J., & Hew, K. (2010). The use of weblogs in higher education settings: A review of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2002). Contributions to a theoretical framework for CSCL. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (pp. 62–71).

  • Stahl, G. (2003). Meaning and interpretation in collaboration. In Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL’03) (pp. 523–532).

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Group Cognition. MIT Press.

  • Stahl, G. (2007). Meaning making in CSCL: Conditions and preconditions for cognitive processes by groups. In Proceedings of the 8th Iternational Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 652–661).

  • Stahl, G. (2009). Studying virtual math teams. Springer Verlag.

  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G., Zhou, N., Cakir, M. P., Sarmiento-Klapper, J. W. (2011). Seeing what we mean: Co-experiencing a shared virtual world. In International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2011) (pp. 534–541). Hong Kong, China: Proceedings.

  • Stevens, R., O’Connor, K., Garrison, L. (2005). Engineering student identities in the navigation of the undergraduate curriculum. In Association of the Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference.

  • Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge Univ Pr.

  • Sunstein, C. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton Univ Pr.

  • Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for cscl. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. (1987). Approaching the concept of discourse community. (Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference of College Composition and Communication.)

  • Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P., Lajoie, S. J., Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229–258). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Thomas, M. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1985). Verbal interaction and learning in peer-directed groups. Theory into Practice, 24(1), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1991) Task related verbal interaction and mathematical learning in small groups. Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 366–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1992). Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 102–119). Cambridge Univ. Press.

  • Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., & Jacobs, J. (2004). Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 232–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagal, J., & Bruckman, A. (2007). Gamelog: Fostering reflective gameplaying for learning. In Proceedings of the 2007 acm siggraph symposium on video games (pp. 31–38).

  • Zemel, A., & Koschmann, T. (2011). Pursuing a question: reinitiating ire sequences as a method of instruction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 475–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, X., & Harris, S. (2005). Blogging in an online health information technology class. Perspectives in Health Information Management/AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association (p. 2).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author would like to thank the meta reviewer and other reviewers for their thoughtful and extensive comments on the earlier drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA

    Richard Alterman & Johann Ari Larusson

Authors
  1. Richard Alterman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Johann Ari Larusson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Alterman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alterman, R., Larusson, J.A. Participation and common knowledge in a case study of student blogging. Computer Supported Learning 8, 149–187 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9167-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9167-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation