Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Two-valued response technique of polychotomous sensitive question

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The randomized response (RR) technique is an effective survey method when collecting sensitive information. This paper proposes a new non-randomized response model for survey sampling with polychotomous sensitive questions: Two-valued response technique. The proportion of the sensitive attribute and its estimator’s variance are estimated under the simple random sampling without replacement and with replacement designs. The relation between the efficiency and the protection of privacy is discussed. The result indicates that the efficiency is in conflict with protection of privacy in the new proposed model, which is the same as that in the RR technique, but the new technique has better characteristics in sociological practice aspects than the RR technique, because it is of low cost, saving time and being operated easily.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. L. Warner, Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1965, 60: 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Z. Z. Yan and Z. K. Nie, A fair comparison of the randomized response strategies, Acta Mathematica Scientia, 2004, 24A(3): 362–368.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. D. G. Horvitz, B. V. Shah, and W. R. Simmons, The unrelated question randomized response model, Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 1967.

  4. N. S. Mangat and S. Ravindra, An alternative randomized response procedure, Biometrika, 1990, 77(2): 439–442.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Arnab and G. Dorffner, Randomized response technique for complex survey designs, Statistical Paper, 2005, 48(1): 131–141.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. T. C. Christofides, A generlized randomized response technique, Metrika, 2003, 57(2): 195–200.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Z. Z. Yan and Z. K. Nie, An alternative technique of sensitive questions survey, Chinese Journal of Applied Probability and Statistics, 2005, 21(3): 327–336.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. B. G. Greenberg, Abul-Ela, Abdel-Latif, et al., A multiproportions RR model, Amer. Statist. Assoc., 1969, 62: 990–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. D. Bourke and T. Dalenius, Some new ideas in the realm of randomized inquiries, Statist. Rev., 1976, 44(2): 219–221.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. M. L. Hubbard, R. A. Casper, and J. T. Lessler, Respondent reactions to item count list and randomized response, Proceedings of the Survey Research Section of the American Statistical Association, Washington, American Statistical Association, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Chaudhuri and T. C. Christofides, Item count technique in estimating the proportion of people with a sensitive feature, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2007, 137(2): 589–593.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. J. A. Droitcour, R. A. Caspar, M. L. Hubbard, et al., The item count technique as a method of indirect questioning: A review of its development and a case study application, Measurement Errors in Surveys, Wiley, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. T. Tan, G. L. Tian, and M. L. Tang, Sample surveys with sensitive questions: A non-randomized response approach, The American Statistician, 2009, 63(1): 10–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science College, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot, 010051, China

    Xiuyun Peng & Zaizai Yan

  2. Management College, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot, 010051, China

    Zaizai Yan

Authors
  1. Xiuyun Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zaizai Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiuyun Peng.

Additional information

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 10761004, the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia under Grant Nos. 2009MS0107 and 2010MS01116, the Talent Development Foundation of Inner Mongolia (2007), and the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia University of Technology under Grant No. X200934.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor Guohua ZOU.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peng, X., Yan, Z. Two-valued response technique of polychotomous sensitive question. J Syst Sci Complex 24, 1193–1203 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-011-8446-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-011-8446-0

Key words

Search

Navigation