Abstract
Patients who benefit from Brain–Computer Interfaces (BCIs) may have difficulties to generate more than one distinct brain pattern which can be used to control applications. Other BCI issues are low performance, accuracy, and, depending on the type of BCI, a long preparation and/or training time. This study aims to show possible solutions. First, we used time-coded motor imagery (MI) with only one pattern. Second, we reduced the training time by recording only 20 trials of active MI to set up a BCI classifier. Third, we investigated a way to record error potentials (ErrPs) during continuous feedback. Ten subjects controlled an artificial arm by performing MI over target time periods between 1 and 4 s. The subsequent movement of this arm served as continuous feedback. Discrete events, which are required to elicit ErrPs, were added by mounting blinking LEDs on top of the continuously moving arm to indicate the future movements. Time epochs after these events were used to evaluate ErrPs offline. The achieved error rate for the arm movement was on average 26.9%. Obtained ErrPs looked similar to results from the previous studies dealing with error detection and the detection rate was above chance level which is a positive outcome and encourages further investigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birbaumer N, Ghanayim N, Hinterberger T, Iversen I, Kotchoubey B, Kübler A, Perelmouter J, Taub E, Flor H (1999) A spelling device for the paralysed. Nature 398:297–298
Blankertz B, Dornhege G, Krauledat M, Müller KR, Kunzmann V, Losch F, Curio G (2006) The Berlin brain–computer interface: EEG-based communication without subject training. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng 14:147–152
Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Hoormann J, Blanke L (1990) Effects of errors in choice reaction tasks on the ERP under focused and divided attention. In: Brunia CHM, Gaillard AWK, Kok A (eds) Psychophysiological brain research. University Press, Tilburg, pp 192–195
Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Christ S, Hohnsbein J (2000) ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial. Biol Psychol 51(2–3):87–107
Farwell LA, Donchin E (1988) Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 70:510–523
Ferrez PW, Millán J del R (2005) You are wrong! Automatic detection of interaction errors from brainwaves. In: 19th International joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 1413–1418
Ferrez PW (2007) Error-related EEG potentials in brain-computer interfaces. PhD thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Ferrez PW, Millán J del R (2008) Error-related EEG potentials generated during simulated brain-computer interaction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(3):923–929
Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugenics 7:179–188
Graimann B, Huggins JE, Levine SP, Pfurtscheller G (2002) Visualization of significant ERD/ERS patterns in multichannel EEG and ECoG data. Clin Neurophysiol 113:43–47
Horki P, Solis-Escalante T, Neuper C, Müller-Putz G (2011) Combined motor imagery and SSVEP based BCI control of a 2 DoF artificial upper limb. Med Biol Eng Comput 49(5):567–577
Kalcher J, Flotzinger D, Neuper C, Gölly S, Pfurtscheller G (1996) Graz brain–computer interface II: towards communication between humans and computers based on online classification of three different EEG patterns. Med Biol Eng Comp 34:382–388
Kleih S, Kaufmann T, Zickler C, Halder S, Leotta F, Cincotti F, Aloise F, Riccio A, Herbert C, Mattia D, Kübler A, Out of the frying pan into the fire—the P300-based BCI faces real-world challenges. In: Schouenborg J, Garwicz M, Danielsen N (eds) Brain–machine interfaces implications for science, clinical practice and society. Progress in Brain Research, Elsevier, pp 27–46 (2011)
Kübler A, Nijboer F, Mellinger J, Vaughan TM, Pawelzik H, Schalk G, McFarland DJ, Birbaumer N, Wolpaw JR (2005) Patients with ALS can use sensorimotor rhythms to operate a brain–computer interface. Neurology 64:1775–1777
Mason SG, Bashashati A, Fatourechi M, Navarro KF, Birch GE (2007) A comprehensive survey of brain interface technology designs. Ann Biomed Eng 35:137–169
Mathalon DH, Whitfield SL, Ford JM (2003) Anatomy of an error: ERP and fMRI. Biol Psychol 64(1–2):119–141
Middendorf M, McMillan G, Calhoun G, Jones KS (2000) Brain–computer interfaces based on the steady-state visual-evoked response. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 8:211–214
Miltner WHR, Braun CH, Coles MGH (1997) Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a ‘generic’ neural system for error-detection. J Cognitive Neurosci 9:788–798
Müller-Putz GR, Scherer R, Pfurtscheller G, Rupp R (2005) EEG-based neuroprosthesis control: a step towards clinical practice. Neurosci Lett 382:169–174
Müller-Putz GR, Scherer R, Neuper C, Pfurtscheller G (2006) Steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials: suitable brain signals for brain-computer interfaces? IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 14:30–37
Müller-Putz GR, Scherer R, Brunner R, Leeb R, Pfurtscheller G (2008) Better than random? A closer look on BCI results. Int J Bioelectromagnet 10:52–55
Müller-Putz GR, Scherer R, Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C (2010) Temporal coding of brain patterns for direct limb control in humans. Front Neurosci 4:34
Müller-Putz GR, Kaiser V, Solis-Escalante T, Pfurtscheller G (2010) Fast set-up asynchronous brain-switch based on detection of foot motor imagery in 1-channel EEG. Med Biol Eng Comput 48(4):331–341
Neuper C, Müller-Putz GR, Scherer R, Pfurtscheller G (2006) Motor imagery and EEG-based control of spelling devices and neuroprostheses. Prog Brain Res 159:393–409
O’Connell RG, Dockree PM, Bellgrove MA, Kelly SP, Hester R, Garavan H, Robertson IH, Foxe JJ (2007) The role of cingulate cortex in the detection of errors with and without awareness: a high-density electrical mapping study. Eur J Neurosci 25(8):2571–2579
Pfurtscheller G, Lopes da Silva FH (1999) Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin Neurophysiol 110:1842–1857
Pfurtscheller G, Guger C, Müller G, Krausz G, Neuper C (2000) Brain oscillations control hand orthosis in a tetraplegic. Neurosci Lett 292:211–214
Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C (2001) Motor imagery and direct brain–computer communication. P IEEE 89:1123–1134
Pfurtscheller G, Müller GR, Pfurtscheller J, Gerner HJ, Rupp R (2003) “Thought”-control of functional electrical stimulation to restore handgrasp in a patient with tetraplegia. Neurosci Lett 351:33–36
Schalk G, Wolpaw JR, McFarland DJ, Pfurtscheller G (2000) EEG-based communication: presence of an error potential. Clin Neurophysiol 111(12):2138–2144
Van Schie HT, Mars RB, Coles MGH, Bekkering H (2004) Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation. Nat Neurosci 7:549–554
Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, McFarland DJ, Pfurtscheller G, Vaughan TM (2002) Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol 113:767–791
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the European ICT Programme Project FP7-224631. This paper only reflects the authors’ views and funding agencies are not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained herein.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kreilinger, A., Neuper, C. & Müller-Putz, G.R. Error potential detection during continuous movement of an artificial arm controlled by brain–computer interface. Med Biol Eng Comput 50, 223–230 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0858-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0858-4