Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Finite element analysis in brace treatment on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized as three-dimensional (3D) deformity, and bracing is a common conservative treatment for AIS. Finite element analysis (FEA) is a technique for numerically solving the differential equations arising in engineering and mathematical modeling and has been widely used in biomechanical studies. Recently, FEA has been under intensive focus to improve the clinical outcomes of brace treatment. This review focuses on using FEA to assist brace treatment for AIS and technique choices that may be encountered during the construction of the finite element model (FEM). The construction of geometric models, the mechanical property, element type, the boundary condition, and the observation items of FEA have been summarized while establishing FEM. In each technical aspect, different fields and limitations of FEA are discussed. The observation items based on FEA are collected in addition to the biomechanical value in clinical research. We also summarized the technical aspects of brace treatment by FEA and observation items and provided guidance and directions to improve the brace treatment.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dayer R, Haumont T, Belaieff W, Lascombes P (2013) Idiopathic scoliosis: etiological concepts and hypotheses. J Child Orthop 7(1):11–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0458-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Peng Y, Wang SR, Qiu GX, Zhang JG, Zhuang QY (2020) Research progress on the etiology and pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Chinese Med J 133(4):483–493. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fadzan M, Bettany-Saltikov J (2017) Etiological theories of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: past and present. Open Orthop J 11(Suppl-9, M3):1466–1489. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001711011466

  4. Bidari S, Kamyab M, Ghandhari H, Komeili A (2021) Efficacy of computer-aided design and manufacturing versus computer-aided design and finite element modeling technologies in brace management of idiopathic scoliosis: a narrative review. Asian Spine J 15(2):271–282. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0263

  5. Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R (2013) Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 7(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0457-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang W, Baran GR, Betz RR, Samdani AF, Pahys JM, Cahill PJ (2014) The use of finite element models to assist understanding and treatment for scoliosis: a review paper. Spine Deformity 2(1):10–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2013.09.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Colak TK, Akgul T, CoLAK I, Dereli EE, Chodza M, Dikici F (2017) Health related quality of life and perception of deformity in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Back Musculoskelet 30:597–602. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-160564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Negrini S, Hresko TM, O’Brien JP, Price N (2015) SOSORT Boards and SRS Non-Operative Committee. Recommendations for research studies on treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: consensus 2014 between SOSORT and SRS non-operative management committee. Scoliosis 10(1):8https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-014-0025-4

  9. Kaelin AJ (2020) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: indications for bracing and conservative treatments. Ann Transl Med 8(2):28. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.09.69

  10. Wong MS, Cheng JC, Wong MW, So SF (2005) A work study of the CAD/CAM method and conventional manual method in the fabrication of spinal orthoses for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Prosthet Orthot Int 29(1):93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461550500066782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weiss HR, Kleban A (2015) Development of CAD/CAM Based brace models for the treatment of patients with scoliosis-classification based approach versus finite element modelling. Asian Spine J 9(5):661–667. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2015.9.5.661

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Guy A, Labelle H, Barchi S, Audet-Duchesne E, Cobetto N, Parent S, Raison M, Aubin CE, P (2020) Braces designed using CAD/CAM combined or not with finite element modeling lead to effective treatment and quality of life after 2 years. Spine 46(1):9-16https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003705

  13. Cui H, Wei W, Shao Y, Du K (2021) Finite element analysis of fixation effect for femoral neck fracture under different fixation configurations. Comput Method Biomec. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2021.1935899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim YH, Khuyagbaatar b, Kin K (2018) Recent advances in finite element modeling of the human cervical spine. J Mech Sci Technol 32(1):1-10https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-017-1201-2

  15. Karavidas N (2019) Bracing In The Treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evidence to date. Adolesc Health Med T 10:153–172. https://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S190565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ng SY, Borysov M, Moramarco M, Nan XF, Weiss HR (2016) Bracing scoliosis - state of the art (mini-review). Curr Pediatr Rev 12(1):36–42. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573396312666151117120905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB (2013) Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. New Engl J Med 369(16):1512–1521. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1307337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dehzangi O, Iftikhar O, Bache BA, Wensman J, Li Y, editor Force and activity monitoring system for scoliosis patients wearing back braces. IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE);2018; Las Vegas, Nevada

  19. Chalmers E, Lou E, Hill D, Zhao HV (2015) An advanced compliance monitor for patients undergoing brace treatment for idiopathic scoliosis. Med Eng Phys 37(2):203–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.12.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Karol LA, Virostek D, Felton K, Wheeler L (2016) Effect of compliance counseling on brace use and success in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 981:9–14. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.O.00359

  21. Weiss HR, Seibel S, Moramarco M, Kleban A (2013) Bracing scoliosis: the evolution to CAD/CAM for improved in-brace corrections. Hard Tissue 2(5):43. https://doi.org/10.13172/2050-2303

  22. Landauer F, Wimmer C, Behensky H (2003) Estimating the final outcome of brace treatment for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis at 6-month follow-up. Pediatr Rehabil 6(3–4):201–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13638490310001636817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mauroy JCD, Lecante C, Barral F, Pourret S (2014) Prospective study and new concepts based on scoliosis detorsion of the first 225 early in-brace radiological results with the new Lyon brace: aRTbrace. Scoliosis 9(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-9-19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Clin J, Aubin CE, Parent S, Labelle H (2010) A biomechanical study of the charleston brace for the treatment of scoliosis. Spine 35(19):E940–E947. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c5b5fa

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Clin J, Aubin CE, Sangole A, Labelle H, Parent S (2010) Correlation between immediate in-brace correction and biomechanical effectiveness of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 35(18):1706–1713. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1767285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheng FH, Shih SL, Chou WK, Liu CL, Sung WH, Chen CS (2010) Finite element analysis of the scoliotic spine under different loading conditions. Bio-Med Mater Eng 20(5):251–259. https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-2010-0639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Clin J, Aubin CE, Parent S, Sangole A, Labelle H (2010) Comparison of the biomechanical 3D efficiency of different brace designs for the treatment of scoliosis using a finite element model. Eur Spine J 19(7):1169–1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1268-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Clin J, Aubin CE, Parent S, Labelle H (2011) Biomechanical modeling of brace treatment of scoliosis: effects of gravitational loads. Med Biol Eng Comput 49(7):743–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0737-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Berteau JP, Pithioux M, Mesure S, Bollini G, Chabrand P (2011) Beyond the classic correction system: a numerical nonrigid approach to the scoliosis brace. Spine J 11(5):424–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.01.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Desbiens-Blais F, Clin J, Parent S, Labelle H, Aubin CE (2012) New brace design combining CAD/CAM and biomechanical simulation for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Biomech 27(10):999–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chou WK, Liu CL, Liao YC, Cheng FH, Zhong ZC, Chen CS (2012) Using finite element method to determine pad positions in a Boston brace for enhancing corrective effect on scoliotic spine: a preliminary analysis. J Med Biol Eng 32(1):29–35. https://doi.org/10.5405/jmbe.758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vergari C, Ribes G, Aubert B, Adam C, Miladi L, Abelin-Genevois K, Rouch P, Skalli W (2015) Evaluation of a patient-specific finite-element model to simulate conservative treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deformity 3(1):4–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.06.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cobetto N, Ce A, Clin J, May SLS, Desbiens-Blais F, Labelle H, Parent S (2014) Braces optimized with computer-assisted design and simulations are lighter, more comfortable, and more efficient than plaster-cast braces for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deformity 2(4):276–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rizza R, Liu XC, Thometz J, Tassone C (2015) Comparison of biomechanical behavior between a cast material torso jacket and a polyethylene based jacket. Scoliosis 10(Suppl 2):S15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-10-S2-S15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Vergari c, Courtois I, Ebermeyer E, Bouloussa H, Vialle R, Skalli W (2016) Experimental validation of a patient-specific model of orthotic action in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 25(10):3049-3055https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4511-7

  36. Cobetto N, Aubin CE, Parent S, Clin J, Barchi S, Turgeon I, Labelle H (2016) Effectiveness of braces designed using computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and finite element simulation compared to CAD/CAM only for the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J 25(10):3056–3064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4434-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sattout A, Clin J, Cobetto N, Labelle H, Aubin CE, P (2016) Biomechanical assessment of providence nighttime brace for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deformity 4(4):253-260https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.12.004

  38. Cobetto N, Aubin CE, Parent S, Barchi S, Turgeon I, Labelle H (2017) 3D correction of AIS in braces designed using CAD/CAM and FEM: a randomized controlled trial. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 12:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-017-0128-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Pea R, Dansereau J, Caouette C, Cobetto N, Aubin CE (2018) Computer-assisted design and finite element simulation of braces for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a coronal plane radiograph and surface topography. Clin Biomech 54:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Karimi M, Rabczuk T, Luthfi M, Pourabbas B, Esrafilian A (2019) An evaluation of the efficiency of endpoint control on the correction of scoliotic curve with brace. A case study Acta Bioeng Biomech 21(2):3–10. https://doi.org/10.5277/ABB-01282-2018-05

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Guan T, Zhang Y, Anwar A, Zhang Y, Wang L (2020) Determination of three-dimensional corrective force in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and biomechanical finite element analysis. Front Bioeng Biotech 8:963. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Karimi MT, Rabczuk T, Pourabbas B (2020) Evaluation of the efficiency of various force configurations on scoliotic, lordotic and kyphotic curves in the subjects with scoliosis. Spine Deformity 8(3):361–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00072-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kamal Z, Rouhi G (2020) Stress distribution changes in growth plates of a trunk with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following unilateral muscle paralysis: a hybrid musculoskeletal and finite element model. J Biomech 111:109997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Karimi MT, Rabczuk T, Luthfi M (2020) Evaluation of the effects of various force configurations and magnitudes on scoliotic curve correction by use of finite element analysis: a case study. Curr Orthop Prac 31(5):457–462. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000000903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bavil AY, Rouhi G (2020) The biomechanical performance of the night-time providence brace: experimental and finite element investigations. Heliyon 6(10):e05210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hui CL, Piao J, Wong MS, C ZY (2020) Study of textile fabric materials used in spinal braces for scoliosis. J Med Biol Eng 40(3):356–371https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-020-00516-9

  47. Vergari C, Chen Z, Robichon L, Courtois I, Ebermeyer E, Vialle R, Langlais T, Pietton R, Skalli W (2020) Towards a predictive simulation of brace action in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Comput Method Biomec 24(8):874–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2020.1856373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gould SL, Cristofolini L, Davico G, Viceconti M (2021) Computational modelling of the scoliotic spine: a literature review. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Engng e3503. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3503

  49. Wu W, Han Z, Hu B, Du C, Xing Z, Zhang C, Gao J, Shao B, Chen C (2021) A graphical guide for constructing a finite element model of the cervical spine with digital orthopedic software. Ann Transl Med 9(2):169. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2451

  50. Mitton D, Landry C, Veron S, Skali W, Lavaste F, Guise JAD (2000) 3D reconstruction method from biplanar radiography using non-stereocorresponding points and elastic deformable meshes. Med Biol Eng Comput 38(2):133–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Delorme S, Petit Y, Guise JA, Labelle H, Aubin CE, Dansereau J (2003) Assessment of the 3-D reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 50(8):989–998. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2003.814525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kadoury S, Cheriet F, Dansereau J, Labelle H (2007) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the scoliotic spine and pelvis from uncalibrated biplanar x-ray images. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(2):160–167. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000211259.28497.b8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wybier M, Bossard P (2013) Musculoskeletal imaging in progress: the EOS imaging system. Joint Bone Spine 80(3):238–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.09.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Somoskeoy S, Tunyogi-Csapo M, Bogyo C, Illes T (2012) Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system. Spine J 12(11):1052–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wade R, Yang H, McKenna C, Faria R, Gummerson N, Woolacott N (2013) A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system. Eur Spine 22(2):296–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2469-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Alrehily F, Hogg P, Twiste M, Johansen S, Tootell A (2019) Scoliosis imaging: an analysis of radiation risk in the CT scan projection radiograph and a comparison with projection radiography and EOS. Radiography 24:e68–e74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Chen CS, Cheng CK, Liu CL, Lo WH (2001) Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine. Med Eng Phys 23:483–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(01)00076-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Pezowicz C, Glowacki M (2012) The mechanical properties of human ribs in young adult. Acta Bioeng Biomech 14(2):53–60. https://doi.org/10.5277/abb120207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Guan Y, Yoganandan N, Zhang J, Pintar F, Cusick JF, Wolfla CE, Maiman DJ (2006) Validation of a clinical finite element model of the human lumbosacral spine. Med Bio Eng Comput 44(8):633–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0066-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Perie D, Aubin CE, Lacroix M, Lafon Y, Labelle H (2004) Biomechanical modelling of orthotic treatment of the scoliotic spine including a detailed representation of the brace-torso interface. Med Bio Eng Comput 42(3):339–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/10.1007/BF02344709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Driscoll M, Aubin CE, Moreau A, Villemure I, Parent S (2009) The role of spinal concave–convex biases in the progression of idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 18(2):180–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0862-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Shi L, Wang D, Driscoll M, Villemure I, Chu WCW, Cheng JC, Aubin CE (2011) Biomechanical analysis and modeling of different vertebral growth patterns in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and healthy subjects. Scoliosis 6:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-6-11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Lang CD, Huang ZF, Zou QH, Sui WY, Deng YL, Yang JL (2019) Coronal deformity angular ratio may serve as a valuable parameter to predict in-brace correction in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 19(6):1041–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Mao S, Shi B, Xu L, Wang Z, Hung ALH, Lam TP, Yu FW, Lee KM, Ng BKW, Cheng JCY, Zhu Z, Qiu Y (2016) Initial Cobb angle reduction velocity following bracing as a new predictor for curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 25(2):500–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3937-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Pasha S (2019) 3D spinal and rib cage predictors of brace effectiveness in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMC Musculoskel Dis 20(1):384. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2754-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Almansour H, Pepke W, Bruckner T, Diebo B, G, Akbar M, (2019) Three-dimensional analysis of initial brace correction in the setting of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Clin Med 8(11):1804. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111804

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Courvoisier A, Drevelle X, Vialle R, Dubousset J, Skalli W (2013) 3D analysis of brace treatment in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22(11):2449–2455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2881-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Malfair D, Flemming AK, Dvorak MF, Munk PL, Vertinsky AT, Heran MK, Graeb DA (2010) Radiographic evaluation of scoliosis: review. Am J Roentgenol 194(3):S8–S22. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.7145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Vrtovec T, Pernus F, Likar B (2009) A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation. Eur Spine J 18(8):1079–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0914-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Courvoisier A, Drevelle X, Vialle R, Dubousset J, Skalli W (2013) Transverse plane 3D analysis of mild scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22(11):2427–2432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2862-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Hunter IA, Davies J (2014) Managing pressure sores Wound Manag 32(9):472–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2014.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Kuroki H (2018) Brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Clin Med 7(6):136. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7060136

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Hawary RE, Zaaroor-Regev D, Floman Y, Lonner BS, Alkhalife YI, Betz RR (2018) Brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Clin Med 7(6):136. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7060136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Negrini S, Marchini G (2007) Efficacy of the symmetric, patient-oriented, rigid, three-dimensional, active (SPoRT) concept of bracing for scoliosis: a prospective study of the Sforzesco versus Lyon brace. Eura Medicophys 43(2):171–181 (PMID: 16955065)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Smit TH (2020) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the mechanobiology of differential growth. JOR Spine 3(4):e1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.1115

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE (1999) New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24(8):755–762. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199904150-00005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ersen O, Bilgic S, Koca K, Ege T, Oguz E, Bilekli AB (2016) Difference between SpineCor brace and thoracolumbosacral orthosis for deformity correction and quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Belg 82(4):710–714

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Poncet P, Dansereau J, Labelle H (2001) Geometric torsion in idiopathic scoliosis three-dimensional analysis and proposal for a new classification. 26(20):2235-2243https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200110150-00015

  79. Wu HD, He C, Chu WCW, Wong MS (2020) Estimation of plane of maximum curvature for the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis via a purpose-design computational method. Eur Spine J 30(3):668–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06557-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 82072519).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China

    Wenqing Wei & Junlin Yang

  2. Spine Surgery Center, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China

    Tianyuan Zhang & Junlin Yang

  3. Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510635, China

    Zifang Huang

Authors
  1. Wenqing Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tianyuan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zifang Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Junlin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The concept was proposed by Wenqing Wei. The first draft and literature search were by Wenqing Wei. The review was revised by Tianyuan Zhang and Junlin Yang. All authors commented on the previous versions and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junlin Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, W., Zhang, T., Huang, Z. et al. Finite element analysis in brace treatment on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Med Biol Eng Comput 60, 907–920 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02524-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02524-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation