Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Noninvasive oral cancer screening based on local residual adaptation network using optical coherence tomography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oral cancer is known as one of the relatively common malignancy types worldwide. Despite the easy access of the oral cavity to examination, the invasive biopsy is still essential for final diagnosis, which requires laborious operation and complicated trained specialists. With the development of deep learning, the artificial intelligence (AI) technique is applied for oral cancer examinations and alleviates the workload of manual screening on biopsy. However, existing computer-aided oral cancer diagnostic methods focus on oral cavity environment photos and histology images, which require complicated operations for doctors and are invasive and painful for patients. As a noninvasive, real-time imaging technique, optical coherence tomography (OCT) can express sufficient identical information for oral cancer screening, but it has not been effectively explored for automatic oral cancer diagnosis. This paper proposes a novel deep learning method named Local Residual Adaptation Network (LRAN) for noninvasive oral cancer screening on OCT images, collected from 25 patients in Beijing Stomatological Hospital. Our proposed LRAN consists of a Residual Feature Representation (RFR) module and a Local Distribution Adaptation (LDA) module. Specifically, RFR firstly adopts stacked residual blocks as the backbone network to learn feature representations for training data, optimized by the Cross-Entropy loss, and then deploy Euclidean distance to measure the distribution distance between training and testing OCT images. Finally, LRAN achieves distribution-gap bridging by the LDA module, which integrates local maximum mean discrepancy constraint to estimate and minimize the distribution discrepancy between training and testing sets within the same category. We also collected an OCT-based oral cancer image dataset to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method, and it achieves an accuracy of 91.62%, a sensitivity of 91.66%, and a specificity of 92.58% on this self-collected dataset. Furthermore, we conduct a quantitative and qualitative analysis, and the results demonstrate LRAN model has excellent capability to solve the noninvasive oral cancer screening task.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rimal J, Shrestha A, Maharjan IK, Shrestha S, Shah P (2019) Risk assessment of smokeless tobacco among oral precancer and cancer patients in eastern developmental region of nepal. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP 20(2):411

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Y, Wang N, Xu M, Yu J, Qin C, Luo X, Yang X, Wang T, Li A, Ni D (2020) Deeply-supervised networks with threshold loss for cancer detection in automated breast ultrasound. IEEE Trans Medical Imaging 39(4):866–876. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2936500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas SM, Lefevre JG, Baxter GW, Hamilton NA (2021) Interpretable deep learning systems for multi-class segmentation and classification of non-melanoma skin cancer. Medical Image Anal 68:101915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang Z, Chen B, Xu S, Chen G, Xie J (2021) A novel voting convergent difference neural network for diagnosing breast cancer. Neurocomputing 437:339–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.01.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Welikala RA, Remagnino P, Lim JH, Chan CS, Rajendran S, Kallarakkal TG, Zain RB, Jayasinghe RD, Rimal J, Kerr AR et al (2020) Automated detection and classification of oral lesions using deep learning for early detection of oral cancer. IEEE Access 8:132677–132693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Welikala RA, Remagnino P, Lim JH, Chan CS, Rajendran S, Kallarakkal TG, Zain RB, Jayasinghe RD, Rimal J, Kerr AR, et al (2020) Fine-tuning deep learning architectures for early detection of oral cancer. In: International symposium on mathematical and computational oncology. Springer, pp 25–31

  7. Das DK, Bose S, Maiti AK, Mitra B, Mukherjee G, Dutta PK (2018) Automatic identification of clinically relevant regions from oral tissue histological images for oral squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis. Tissue and Cell 53:111–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeyaraj PR, Nadar ERS (2019) Computer-assisted medical image classification for early diagnosis of oral cancer employing deep learning algorithm. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 145(4):829–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Palaskar R, Vyas R, Khedekar V, Palaskar S, Sahu P Transfer learning for oral cancer detection using microscopic images. arXiv:2011.11610

  10. Costello F (2017) Optical coherence tomography in neuro-ophthalmology. Neurologic Clinics 35(1):153–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsai T-H, Leggett CL, Trindade AJ, Sethi A, Swager A-F, Joshi V, Bergman JJ, Mashimo H, Nishioka NS, Namati E (2017) Optical coherence tomography in gastroenterology: a review and future outlook. Journal of Biomedical Optics 22(12):121716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jerjes W, Hamdoon Z, Hopper C (2020) Structural validation of facial skin using optical coherence tomography: a descriptive study. Skin Research and Technology 26(2):153–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Q, Wu X, Tang T, Zhu S, Yao Q, Gao BZ, Yuan X (2012) Quantitative analysis of rectal cancer by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Physics in Medicine & Biology 57(16):5235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yuan W, Kut C, Liang W, Li X (2017) Robust and fast characterization of oct-based optical attenuation using a novel frequency-domain algorithm for brain cancer detection. Scientific Reports 7(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tes D, Aber A, Zafar M, Horton L, Fotouhi A, Xu Q, Moiin A, Thompson AD, Moraes Pinto Blumetti TC, Daveluy S et al (2018) Granular cell tumor imaging using optical coherence tomography. Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology 9:1179597218790250

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee C-K, Chi T-T, Wu C-T, Tsai M-T, Chiang C-P, Yang C-CC (2012) Diagnosis of oral precancer with optical coherence tomography. Biomedical Optics Express 3(7):1632–1646

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang Z, Shang J, Liu C, Zhang J, Liang Y (2020) Identification of oral cancer in oct images based on an optical attenuation model. Lasers in Medical Science 35(9):1999–2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heidari AE, Sunny SP, James BL, Lam TM, Tran AV, Yu J, Ramanjinappa RD, Uma K, Birur P, Suresh A et al (2018) Optical coherence tomography as an oral cancer screening adjunct in a low resource settings. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 25(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sunny SP, Agarwal S, James BL, Heidari E, Muralidharan A, Yadav V, Pillai V, Shetty V, Chen Z, Hedne N et al (2019) Intra-operative point-of-procedure delineation of oral cancer margins using optical coherence tomography. Oral Oncology 92:12–19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Simonyan V, Zisserman A (2015) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In: Bengio Y, LeCun Y (eds) 3rd international conference on learning representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings

  21. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V, Rabinovich A (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp 1–9

  22. Szegedy C, Vanhoucke V, Ioffe S, Shlens J, Wojna Z (2016) Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp 2818–2826

  23. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp 770–778

  24. Mehta P, Antonelli M, Ahmed HU, Emberton M, Punwani S, Ourselin S (2021) Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI and clinical features: A patient-level classification framework. Medical Image Analysis 73:102153

  25. Li S, Yang Q, Jiang H, Cortés-Vecino JA, Zhang Y (2020) Parasitologist-level classification of apicomplexan parasites and host cell with deep cycle transfer learning (dctl). Bioinformatics 36(16):4498–4505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cen F, Zhao X, Li W, Wang G (2021) Deep feature augmentation for occluded image classification. Pattern Recognition 111:107737

  27. Ma X, Niu Y, Gu L, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Bailey J, Lu F (2021) Understanding adversarial attacks on deep learning based medical image analysis systems. Pattern Recognition 110:107332

  28. Gretton A, Borgwardt KM, Rasch MJ, Schölkopf B, Smola A (2012) A kernel two-sample test. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 13(1):723–773

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu Y, Zhuang F, Wang J, Ke G, Chen J, Bian J, Xiong H, He Q Deep subdomain adaptation network for image classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst

  30. Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, Li L-J, Li K, Fei-Fei L (2009) Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In: 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE, pp 248–255

  31. Kingma DP, Ba J Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research (CFH) (No: CFH 2020-2-2141).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    Wei Yuan, Long Cheng, Jinsuo Yang, Boya Yin, Xingyu Fan, Jing Yang & Xin Huang

  2. College of Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China

    Sen Li

  3. School of Cyberspace Security, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China

    Jianjun Zhong

Authors
  1. Wei Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Long Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jinsuo Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Boya Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xingyu Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jing Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sen Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jianjun Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xin Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, W., Cheng, L., Yang, J. et al. Noninvasive oral cancer screening based on local residual adaptation network using optical coherence tomography. Med Biol Eng Comput 60, 1363–1375 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02535-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02535-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation