Abstract
According to the available studies, mobile applications have provided significant support in improving the diverse skills of special individuals with social pragmatic communication disorder (SPCD). Over the last decade, SPCD has affected 8 to 11% of individuals, and therapy sessions cost between $50 and $150 per hour. This preliminary study aims to develop an interactive, user-friendly intervention to enhance social and emotional interaction skills in individuals with SPCD. The proposed intervention is an Android application that enhances social and emotional interaction skills. This pilot study involved 29 human subjects aged 7–13 years with pragmatic communication deficits. In a randomized controlled trial, the intervention was developed and implemented with consideration of caregiver and professional requirements. The improvement was analyzed using standard scales, including the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) and the Social Communication Disorder Scale (SCDS). Moreover, the outcomes were examined through statistical parameters (mean, standard deviation) and tests (t-test). The intervention significantly improved the social and emotional skills of individuals with deficits. Before using the intervention, the identified statistical values for SCQ (mean = 6.48 and standard deviation = 3.37) and SCDS (mean = 8.17 and standard deviation = 4.79). However, after using the intervention, values for SCQ (mean = 8.24 and standard deviation = 3.95) and SCDS (mean = 9.48 and standard deviation = 4.72) were improved in comparison to the before-intervention outcome. The evaluation of the t-scores and p-values indicates that there has been significant improvement in the performance of individuals after the successful completion of the intervention. The proposed and applied intervention resulted in a significant impact in terms of improvement in social and emotional skills. The study concluded that it allows individuals to practice social and emotional interaction skills in a structured, controlled, and interactive environment. The proposed intervention has been found acceptable as per the reviews of caregivers and professionals, based on essential criteria including user experience, usability, interactive nature, reliability, and creditability.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amoretti MC, Lalumera E, Serpico D (2021) The DSM-5 introduction of the Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorder as a new mental disorder: a philosophical review. Springer International Publishing
Yuan H, Dollaghan C (2018) Measuring the diagnostic features of social (pragmatic) communication disorder: an exploratory study. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 27:647–656. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-16-0219
Brukner-wertman Y, Laor N, Golan O (2016) Social ( pragmatic ) communication disorder and its relation to the autism spectrum : dilemmas arising from the DSM-5 classification. J Autism Dev Disord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2814-5
Ellis Weismer S, Rubenstein E, Wiggins L, Durkin MS (2021) A preliminary epidemiologic study of social (pragmatic) communication disorder relative to autism spectrum disorder and developmental disability without social communication deficits. J Autism Dev Disord 51:2686–2696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04737-4
Mishra S, Laplante-lévesque A, Barbareschi G et al (2022) Assistive technology needs , access and coverage , and related barriers and facilitators in the WHO European region : a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2099021
Moyle W, Bramble M, Jones CJ, Murfield JE (2019) “She had a smile on her face as wide as the great Australian bite”: a qualitative examination of family perceptions of a therapeutic robot and a plush toy. Gerontologist 59:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx180
Redmond SM (2020) Clinical intersections among idiopathic language disorder, social (pragmatic) communication disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Speech, Language, Hear Res 63:3263–3276. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00050
Uzuegbunam N, Wong WH, Cheung SCS, Ruble L (2018) MEBook: multimedia social greetings intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 11:520–535. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2772255
Kanero J, Geçkin V, Oranç C et al (2018) Social robots for early language learning: current evidence and future directions. Child Dev Perspect 12:146–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12277
Saul J, Griffiths S, Norbury CF (2023) Prevalence and functional impact of social (pragmatic) communication disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 64:376–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13705
Buckner E, Kim P (2014) Integrating technology and pedagogy for inquiry-based learning: the Stanford Mobile Inquiry-based Learning Environment (SMILE). Prospects (Paris) 44:99–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9269-7
Horstmann AC, Mühl L, Köppen L et al (2022) Important preliminary insights for designing successful communication between a robotic learning assistant and children with autism spectrum disorder in Germany. Robotics 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics11060141
Ruben RJ (2000) Redefining the survival of the fittest: communication disorders in the 21st century. Laryngoscope 110:241. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200002010-00010
Singhal BS, Khadilkar SV (2014) Neurology in the developing world, 1st edn. Elsevier B.V
Bono V, Narzisi A, Jouen AL et al (2016) GOLIAH: a gaming platform for home-based intervention in autism - principles and design. Front Psychiatry 7:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00070
Suresh N (2023) High healthcare costs to Indian families
Cook S (2020) Speech, language and communication needs of looked after young people. https://www.rcn.org.uk/-/media/royal-college-of-nursing/documents/forums/children-and-young-people/staying-healthy-forum/lac-stuart-cook.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2021
Law J, Zeng B, Lindsay G, Beecham J (2012) Cost-effectiveness of interventions for children with speech, language and communication needs (SLCN): a review using the Drummond and Jefferson (1996) “Referee’s Checklist”. Int J Lang Commun Disord 47:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00084.x
Adams C, Lockton E, Collins A (2018) Metapragmatic explicitation and social attribution in social communication disorder and developmental language disorder: a comparative study. J Speech, Language, Hear Res 61:604–618. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0026
Black LI, Vahratian A, Hoffman HJ (2022) A report on communication disorders and use of intervention services among children aged 3–17 Years. In: National center for health statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db205.htm. Accessed 30 Nov 2021
Ke F, Im T (2013) Virtual-reality-based social interaction training for children with high-functioning autism. J Educ Res 106:441–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.832999
Turkstra LS, Clark A, Burgess S et al (2017) Pragmatic communication abilities in children and adults: implications for rehabilitation professionals. Disabil Rehabil 39:1872–1885. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1212113
Jamwal R, Jarman HK, Roseingrave E, et al (2020) Smart home and communication technology for people with disability : a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 0:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1818138
Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Alberti G (2019) Assistive technology to support communication in individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders. Curr Dev Disord Rep 6:126–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-019-00165-x
Modi N, Singh J (2022) A survey of research trends in assistive technologies using information modelling techniques. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 17:605–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1817992
Brignell A, Chenausky KV, Song H et al (2018) Communication interventions for autism spectrum disorder in minimally verbal children. Cochrane Datab Syst Rev 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012324.pub2
Kouo JL (2019) The effectiveness of a packaged intervention including point-of-view video modeling in teaching social initiation skills to children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl 34:141–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357618815887
Ip HHS, Wong SWL, Chan DFY et al (2018) Enhance emotional and social adaptation skills for children with autism spectrum disorder: a virtual reality enabled approach. Comput Educ 117:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.010
Ramírez-Duque AA, Bastos T, Munera M et al (2020) Robot-assisted intervention for children with special needs: a comparative assessment for autism screening. Rob Auton Syst 127:103484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2020.103484
Sengupta K, Mahadik S, Kapoor G (2020) Glocalizing project ImPACT: feasibility, acceptability and preliminary outcomes of a parent-mediated social communication intervention for autism adapted to the Indian context. Res Autism Spectr Disord 76:101585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101585
Gal E, Lamash L, Bauminger-Zviely N et al (2016) Using multitouch collaboration technology to enhance social interaction of children with high-functioning autism. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 36:46–58. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.2015.1040572
Singh N, Lee JJ, Grover I, Breazeal C (2018) P2PSTORY: dataset of children as storytellers and listeners in peer-to-peer interactions. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 2018-April, pp 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174008
Martín-Ruiz ML, Máximo-Bocanegra N, Luna-Oliva L (2016) A virtual environment to improve the detection of oral-facial malfunction in children with cerebral palsy. Sensors (Switzerland) 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16040444
Zhao H, Swanson AR, Weitlauf AS et al (2018) Hand-in-hand: a communication-enhancement collaborative virtual reality system for promoting social interaction in children with autism spectrum disorders. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 48:136–148. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2791562
Herrero JF, Lorenzo G (2020) An immersive virtual reality educational intervention on people with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) for the development of communication skills and problem solving. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) 25:1689–1722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10050-0
Mosher MA, Carreon AC (2021) Teaching social skills to students with autism spectrum disorder through augmented, virtual and mixed reality. Res Learn Technol 29:1–22. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2626
Dehkordi PS, Moradi H, Mahmoudi M, Pouretemad HR (2015) The design, development, and deployment of RoboParrot for screening autistic children. Int J Soc Robot 7:513–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0309-8
Rudovic O, Lee J, Dai M et al (2018) Personalized machine learning for robot perception of affect and engagement in autism therapy. Sci Robot 3:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aao6760
Mosher MA, Carreon AC, Craig SL, Ruhter LC (2022) Immersive technology to teach social skills to students with autism spectrum disorder: a literature review. Rev J Autism Dev Disord 9:334–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-021-00259-6
Bravo FA, Hurtado JA, González E (2021) Using robots with storytelling and drama activities in science education. Educ Sci (Basel):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070329
Malinverni L, Mora-Guiard J, Padillo V et al (2017) An inclusive design approach for developing video games for children with autism spectrum disorder. Comput Human Behav 71:535–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.018
Ntalindwa T, Nduwingoma M, Karangwa E et al (2021) Development of a mobile app to improve numeracy skills of children with autism spectrum disorder: participatory design and usability study. JMIR Pediatr Parent 4:1–2. https://doi.org/10.2196/21471
Maseri M, Mamat M, Yew HT, Chekima A (2021) The implementation of application software to improve verbal communication in children with autism spectrum disorder: a review. Children 8:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8111001
Hourcade JP, Williams SR, Miller EA et al (2013) Evaluation of tablet apps to encourage social interaction in children with autism spectrum disorders. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 3197–3206
Leung PWS, Li SX, Tsang CSO et al (2021) Effectiveness of using mobile technology to improve cognitive and social skills among individuals with autism spectrum disorder: systematic literature review. JMIR Ment Health 8:1–22. https://doi.org/10.2196/20892
Al-Saadi AM, Al-Thani D (2023) Mobile application to identify and recognize emotions for children with autism: a systematic review. Front Child Adolescent Psychiatr 2:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2023.1118665
Abdi S, Kitsara I, Hawley MS, de Witte LP (2021) Emerging technologies and their potential for generating new assistive technologies. Assistive Technol 33:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1945704
Pomazan V, Tvoroshenko I, Gorokhovatskyi V (2023) Development of an application for recognizing emotions using convolutional neural networks. Int J Acad Inform Syst Res 7:25–36
Halabi O, Elseoud SA, Alja’am JM et al (2017) Immersive virtual reality in improving communication skills in children with autism. Int J Interact Mobile Technol 11:146–158. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i2.6555
Light J, McNaughton D (2012) Supporting the communication, language, and literacy development of children with complex communication needs: state of the science and future research priorities. Assistive Technol 24:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2011.648717
Logan K, Iacono T, Trembath D (2017) A systematic review of research into aided AAC to increase social-communication functions in children with autism spectrum disorder. AAC: Augmentat Alternat Commun 33:51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1267795
Abbas H, Garberson F, Glover E, Wall DP (2018) Machine learning approach for early detection of autism by combining questionnaire and home video screening. J Am Med Inform Assoc 25:1000–1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy039
Moon SJ, Hwang J, Kana R et al (2019) Accuracy of machine learning algorithms for the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis of brain magnetic resonance imaging studies. JMIR Ment Health 6:1–22. https://doi.org/10.2196/14108
APA (2003) Diagnostic and statistical manual of DSM-5. APA, Washington, DC
Hamid MA, Singh J (2023) Emotion quantification techniques for cognitive reappraisal: a systematic review and scientometric analysis. Artif Intell Rev 56:3363–3416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10606-0
Putnam C, Chong L (2008) Software and technologies designed for people with autism: what do users want? In: ASSETS’08: The 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1414471.1414475
Khullar V, Singh HP (2022) Vocal-friend: internet of social-things framework to aid verbal communication. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2060349
Litras S, Moore DW, Anderson A (2010) Using video self-modelled social stories to teach social skills to a young child with autism. Autism Res Treat 2010:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/834979
Michael Barker R, Saunders KJ, Brady NC (2012) Reading instruction for children who use AAC: considerations in the pursuit of generalizable results. AAC: Augmentat Alternat Commun 28:160–170. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2012.704523
Kumazaki H, Warren Z, Muramatsu T et al (2017) A pilot study for robot appearance preferences among high-functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorder: implications for therapeutic use. PLoS One 12:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186581
Chung CH, Chen CH (2017) Augmented reality based social stories training system for promoting the social skills of children with autism. Adv Intell Syst Computing 486:495–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41685-4_44
Jadi AM (2019) Improving the communication for children with speech disorders using the smart toys. Int J Artificial Intell Appl 10:25–40. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijaia.2019.10303
Charlop MH, Lang R, Rispoli M (2018) Lights, camera, action! Teaching play and social skills to children with autism spectrum disorder through video modeling
Davidson C, MacDonald A, Fenton A (2018) “These are my camera glasses”: wearable digital video glasses for recording and examining young children’s social interactions. Asia-Pacific J Res Early Childhood Educ 12:93–119. https://doi.org/10.17206/apjrece.2018.12.3.93
Yamamoto H, Sato A, Itakura S (2019) Eye tracking in an everyday environment reveals the interpersonal distance that affords infant-parent gaze communication. Sci Rep 9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46650-6
Johnson E, Hervás R, Gutiérrez-López-Franca C et al (2017) Analyzing and predicting empathy in neurotypical and nonneurotypical users with an affective avatar. Mobile Inform Syst 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7932529
Johnson E, Hervás R, de la Franca CGL et al (2018) Assessing empathy and managing emotions through interactions with an affective avatar. Health Informatics J 24:182–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458216661864
Alves S, Marques A, Queirós C, Orvalho V (2013) LifeisGame prototype: a serious game about emotions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Psychnol J 11:191–211
Romero NL (2017) A pilot study examining a computer-based intervention to improve recognition and understanding of emotions in young children with communication and social deficits. Res Dev Disabil 65:35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.04.007
Murphy S, Joffe V, Messer D et al (2019) Evaluating ‘ enhancing pragmatic language skills for young children with social communication impairments ’ ( E-PLAYS ): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial study. Pilot Feasibil Stud 5:1–13
Anthony N, Bobzien J (2022) Using two formats of a social story to increase the verbal initiations and on-topic responses of two adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 52:4138–4149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05298-w
Lee IJ, Chen CH, Wang CP, Chung CH (2018) Augmented reality plus concept map technique to teach children with ASD to use social cues when meeting and greeting. Asia-Pacific Educ Res 27:227–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0382-5
Warren Z, Zheng Z, Das S et al (2015) Brief report: development of a robotic intervention platform for young children with ASD. J Autism Dev Disord 45:3870–3876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2334-0
Mat Rabi N, Nordin NS (2021) The effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on social communication skills for children with learning disabilities. Int J Acad Res Business Soc Sci 11:833–842. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i1/9004
De Bordes PF, Cox RFA, Hasselman F, Cillessen AHN (2013) Toddlers’ gaze following through attention modulation: intention is in the eye of the beholder. J Exp Child Psychol 116:443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.008
Murias M, Major S, Davlantis K et al (2018) Validation of eye-tracking measures of social attention as a potential biomarker for autism clinical trials. Autism Research 11:166–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1894
Withey KL (2017) Using apps to develop social skills in children with autism spectrum disorder. Interv Sch Clin 52:250–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216659475
Wenzel A (2016) Social communication disorder
Wenzel A (2017) Social Communication Disorder Scale. In: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Abnormal and Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483365817.n1282
DeMara RF, Gonzalez AJ, Hung V et al (2008) Towards interactive training with an avatar-based human-computer interface. In: Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC) 8054, pp 1–10
Johnson E, Hervás R, Mondéjar T, Bravo J, Ochoa SF (2015) Improving social communication disorders through human-avatar interactions. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 9456). Springer, pp 237–243
Snow AV, Lecavalier L (2008) Sensitivity and specificity of the modified checklist for autism in toddlers and the social communication questionnaire in preschoolers suspected of having pervasive developmental disorders. Autism 12:627–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361308097116
Kuriakose S, Lahiri U (2017) Design of a physiology-sensitive VR-based social communication platform for children with autism. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 25:1180–1191. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2613879
Choudhary RR, Meena G, Mohbey KK (2022) Speech emotion based sentiment recognition using deep neural networks. J Phys Conf Ser:2236. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2236/1/012003
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge the participants, parents, professionals, and those who provided the resources for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Annexure 1
The SCQ scores are calculated on different parameters, including emotions, social interaction, and greetings. The computation involves many factors, including the ability to communicate and smile. Each of these items has a specific weight. The weight of emotions varies in the range of 0 to 4, greetings in the range of 0 to 1, and social interaction varies from 0 to 9. For SCQ analysis, greetings has been abbreviated as GSCQ, emotions have been abbreviated as ESCQ, and social interaction has been abbreviated as ISCQ. The computation of all the parameters determines the initial scoring for each stage. The score of each parameter is represented by the sum of the individual factor weights. The total score (TSCQ) is being calculated by adding the scores for the ESCQ, GSCQ, and ISCQ
Emotions (ESCQ) Score range—0–4 | Greetings (GSCQ) Score range—0–1 | Social interaction (ISCQ) Score range—0–9 |
---|---|---|
1. Appropriate use of gestures 2. Social smiling in social environment 3. Appropriate use of social expression 4. Imitate the emotions | 1. Appropriate use of greetings | 1. Initiate conversation 2. Respond to questions 3. Initiate and sustain verbal conversation 4. Tries to get involved in social chat 5. Try to phrase sentences 6. Response to interaction with others 7. Try to use neologisms 8. Imitate social play 9. Imaginative conversation play with peers |
Annexure 2
For score calculation, this paper has utilized emotions, social interaction, and greetings-related characteristics from the SCDS scale. The computation encompasses criteria such as having difficulty producing emotion required in a specific situation, having difficulty using ritualistic greetings/closings when appropriate, and other related aspects. Each of these items possesses a distinct weight. The weight of emotions ranges from 0 to 4, greetings vary from 0 to 1, and social interaction ranges from 0 to 12. For SCDS analysis, greetings have been abbreviated as GSCDS, emotions have been abbreviated as ESCDS, and social interaction has been abbreviated as ISCDS. The calculation of all the parameters establishes the initial scoring for each stage. The score of each parameter is determined by adding up the weights of the distinct factors. The ESCDS, GSCDS, and ISCDS scores will be added to calculate the total score (TSCDS)
Emotions (ESCQ) Score range—0–4 | Greetings (GSCQ) Score range—0–1 | Social interaction (ISCQ) Score range—0–12 |
---|---|---|
1. Has difficulty producing emotion required in a specific situation (e.g., excited) 2. Has difficulty expressing opinions, feelings, and/or emotions 3. Does not show change in emotion through facial expressions (e.g., flat or inappropriate) 4. Use of emotion according to the appropriate situation | 1. Has difficulty using ritualistic greetings/closings when appropriate (e.g., “Hello,” “Goodbye”) | 1. Has difficulty using verbal language as a tool to obtain desired results 2. Has a limited expressive vocabulary 3. Has a limited receptive vocabulary 4. Does not express complete thoughts when speaking (e.g., speaks in incomplete sentences, unable to retrieve words to express ideas accurately) 5. Lacks spontaneity, originality, and/or variety in verbal interactions (e.g., repeats words/phrases excessively) 6. Uses unusual speech patterns that are overly precise and pedantic (i.e., talks like a “little professor”) or speaks in a singsong manner 7. Inappropriately uses newly learned communication skills in novel and familiar communicative situations (e.g., overapplies greetings to everyone he/she sees, answers “fine” to all questions directed to him/her) 8. Does not respond to others’ communication initiations (e.g., doesn’t respond to his/her name) 9. Demonstrates difficulty with topic initiation, maintenance, and/or closure including irrelevant, tangential, or associative response 10. Does not use appropriate verbal and/or nonverbal language in social situations or interactions with peers 11. Does not use grammatically complete sentences when speaking (e.g., “Ball under the table.” instead of “The ball is under the table.”) 12. Demonstrates difficulty understanding the meaning of words indicating a question (e.g., who, what, when, where, why, and how) |
Annexure 3
The analysis of the intervention has been conducted through the caregiver on a scale of 0 to 10. This annexure illustrates the several parameters to assess the individuals with social and emotional skills
Parameters | |
1. Smile i. to learn different smiles ii. Ability to recognize different smiles iii. Ability to imitate iv. Imitate and build v. Use appropriate smile in different scenarios | |
2. Emotions i. Ability to differentiate between different emotions ii. Ability to recognize the emotions iii. Ability to understand the feelings iv. Imitate the emotions v. Imitate and build vi. Ability to respond to the question with emotions vii. Ability to use proper emotion in any scenario viii. How often use the emotions? | |
3. Smile and Greet i. Ability to use appropriate smile ii. Imitate smile iii. Imitate smile and ability to greet iv. Ability to understand the different greetings v. Respond without thinking vi. How often use the smile and greet to the people? | |
4. Smile and Communicate i. Ability to use appropriate smile and communicate ii. Imitate smile and ability to communicate iii. Ability to understand the different sentences iv. Ability to frame the sentences v. Respond without thinking vi. How often use the smile and communicate to the people? vii. Ability to grab attention and maintain focus |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chawla, M., Panda, S.N. & Khullar, V. SMILEY—assistive application to support social and emotional skills in SPCD individuals. Med Biol Eng Comput 62, 3507–3529 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-024-03151-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-024-03151-7