Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Optimal port placement planning method for laparoscopic gastrectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In laparoscopic gastrectomy, as well as other laparoscopic surgery, the surgeon operates on target organs using a laparoscope and forceps inserted into the abdominal cavity through ports placed in the abdominal wall. Therefore, port placement is of vital significance in laparoscopic surgery. In this paper, we present a method for achieving optimal port placement in laparoscopic gastrectomy based on relationships between the locations of the ports and anatomical structures.

Methods

We utilize three angle conditions to determine the optimal port placement. Proper angles for the angle conditions are calculated from measurements obtained during laparoscopic gastrectomy. The port positions determined by surgeons experienced in laparoscopic gastrectomy are measured using a three-dimensional positional tracker. The locations of the blood vessels, as well as other vital anatomical structures that are also critical in laparoscopic gastrectomy, are identified from computed tomography images. The angle relationships between the port and blood vessel locations are analyzed using the obtained positional information. Optimal port placement is determined based on the angle conditions.

Results

We evaluated the proposed method using the positional information obtained during 26 laparoscopic gastrectomies. Our evaluation determined that the proposed method generates optimal port placement with average errors of 22.2 and 21.2 mm in the left- and the right-hand side ports for a lead surgeon. Experienced surgeons confirmed that the optimal port placement generated by the proposed method was sufficient for clinical use.

Conclusions

The proposed method provides optimal port placement in laparoscopic gastrectomy and enables a novice surgeon to determine port placement much like an experienced surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Etoh T, Inomata M, Shiraishi N, Kitano S (2013) Minimally invasive approaches for gastric cancer—Japanese experiences. J Surg Oncol 107:282–288. doi:10.1002/jso.23128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fujiwara M, Kodera Y, Misawa K, Kinoshita M, Kinoshita T, Miura S, Ohashi N, Nakayama G, Koike M, Nakao A (2008) Longterm outcomes of early-stage gastric carcinoma patients treated with laparoscopy-assisted surgery. J Am Coll Surg 206:138–143. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hanna GB, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1997) Optimal port locations for endoscopic intracorporeal knotting. Surg Endosc 11:397–401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hanna GB, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1997) Influence of direction of view, target-to-endoscope distance and manipulation angle on endoscopic knot tying. Br J Surg 84:1460–1464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adhami L, Coste-Manière È (2003) Optimal planning for minimally invasive surgical robots. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 19:854–863. doi:10.1109/TRA.2003.817061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cannon JW, Stoll JA, Selha SD, Dupont PE, Howe RD, Torchiana DF (2003) Port placement planning in robot-assisted coronary artery bypass. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 19:912–917. doi:10.1109/TRA.2003.817502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Feuerstein M, Mussack T, Heining SM, Navab N (2008) Intraoperative laparoscope augmentation for port placement and resection planning in minimally invasive liver resection. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27:355–369. doi:10.1109/TMI.2007.907327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayashi Y, Misawa K, Mori K (2016) Port placement planning assistance for laparoscopic gastrectomy based on anatomical structure analysis. Int J CARS 11(Sup.1):S265–S266

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee SW, Shinohara H, Matsuki M, Okuda J, Nomura E, Mabuchi H, Nishiguchi K, Takaori K, Narabayashi I, Tanigawa N (2003) Preoperative simulation of vascular anatomy by three-dimensional computed tomography imaging in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg 197:927–936. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.07.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Iino I, Sakaguchi T, Kikuchi H, Miyazaki S, Fujita T, Hiramatsu Y, Ohta M, Kamiya K, Ushio T, Takehara Y, Konno H (2013) Usefulness of three-dimensional angiographic analysis of perigastric vessels before laparoscopic gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 16:355–361. doi:10.1007/s10120-012-0194-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mori K, Higuchi Y, Suenaga Y, Toriwaki J, Hasegawa J, Katada K (2000) A method of interactive specification of interested regions via a volume rendered image with application to virtualized endoscope system. In: Chen C, Clough A (eds) Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3978, Physiology and function from multidimensional images, SPIE, pp 134–145

  13. Hayashi Y, Misawa K, Oda M, Hawkes DJ, Mori K (2016) Clinical application of a surgical navigation system based on virtual laparoscopy in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Int J CARS 11:827–836. doi:10.1007/s11548-015-1293-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanigawa N, Lee SW, Kimura T, Mori T, Uyama I, Nomura E, Okuda J, Konishi F (2011) The endoscopic surgical skill qualification system for gastric surgery in Japan. Asian J Endosc Surg 4:112–115. doi:10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00082.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank our colleagues for their suggestions and advice. This work was supported in part by a Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, by the Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED, and by JSPS KAKENHI (26560255, 26108006, 25242049).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuichiro Hayashi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Aichi Cancer Center.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayashi, Y., Misawa, K. & Mori, K. Optimal port placement planning method for laparoscopic gastrectomy. Int J CARS 12, 1677–1684 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1548-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1548-y

Keywords