Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Ökonomischer Wert von Informationssystemen

Beitrag von Literatur-Reviews zum Wissenserhalt

Preserving Knowledge on IS Business Value

  • State of the Art
  • Published:
WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK

Zusammenfassung

Die ökonomische Bedeutung von Informationssystemen wird seit vielen Jahren untersucht und es sind mittlerweile zahlreiche Forschungsbeiträge publiziert. Dennoch sahen sich Forscher in der Vergangenheit der steten Herausforderung gegenüber, den ökonomischen Wert von Informationssystemen zu erklären. Diese Herausforderung dokumentiert sich u. a. im so genannten Produktivitätsparadoxon der 1990er Jahre, in dem viel beachteten Artikel „IT doesn’t matter“ von Carr und in diversen Studien, die keinen empirischen Nachweis der Korrelation zwischen Investitionen in Informationssystemen und ökonomischem Output erbringen konnten. Die Kritik am Nutzen von Investitionen in Informationssysteme ist auch weiterhin präsent, sie wird sowohl von einigen Praktikern als auch Forschern geteilt. Basierend auf dieser Kritik erhebt sich die Frage, inwiefern Literatur-Reviews ihr Potenzial genutzt haben, dieser Kritik zu begegnen, indem sie zentrale Forschungsfelder der ökonomischen Bewertung von Informationssystemen untersucht und deren Kernergebnisse herausgestellt haben. Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage identifiziert und beschreibt dieser Artikel zunächst 12 zentrale Forschungsfelder und analysiert anschließend für jedes Forschungsfeld, welchen Beitrag zum Wissenserhalt einschlägige Literatur-Reviews insgesamt geleistet haben. Die Analyse von 22 Literatur-Reviews verdeutlicht, dass einige wesentliche Forschungsfelder vernachlässigt wurden, die es in zukünftigen Reviews zu adressieren gilt. Da der vorliegende Beitrag auf den Ergebnissen von mehr als 200 Forschungsbeiträgen basiert, kann ein umfassender State of the Art der Erforschung des ökonomischen Werts von Informationssystemen dargestellt werden.

Abstract

The economic relevance of information systems has been studied for many years and has attracted an abundance of research papers. However, the “productivity paradoxon” of the 1990s, Carr’s widely recognized paper “IT doesn’t matter”, and several studies that do not find a positive correlation between IS investments and economic performance reveal long-lasting difficulties for IS researchers to explain “IS business value”. Business executives and researchers also continue to question the value of IS investments. This raises the question of whether literature reviews have tapped their potential to address the concerns by covering key research areas of IS business value and preserving their key findings. In order to address this question, this paper identifies and describes 12 key research areas, and synthesizes what literature reviews published in pertinent academic outlets have done to preserve knowledge. The analysis of 22 literature reviews shows that some crucial areas have not been (sufficiently) covered. They provide fertile areas for future literature reviews. As this work is based on the results of more than 200 research papers, it is capable of drawing a comprehensive picture of the current state-of-the-art in IS business value research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  • Agarwal R, Lucas HC (2005) The information systems identity crisis: focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research. MIS Quarterly 29(3):381–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpar P, Kim M (1990) A microeconomic approach to the measurement of information technology value. Journal of Management Information Systems 7(2):55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alshawi S, Irani Z, Baldwin LP (2003) Benchmarking information technology investment and benefits extraction. Benchmarking – An International Journal 10(4):414–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ATIS (2007) ATIS telecom glossary 2007. http://www.atis.org/glossary/

  • Au YA, Kauffman RJ (2003) What do you know? Rational expectations in information technology adoption and investment. Journal of Management Information Systems 20(2):49–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baily MN (1986) What has happened to productivity growth? Science 234:443–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakos JY (1987) Dependent variables for the study of firm and industry-level impacts of information technology. In: Proc international conference on information systems, Pittsburgh

  • Bannister F, Remenyi D (2000) Acts of faith: instinct, value and IT investment decisions. Journal of Information Technology 15(3):231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barua A, Kriebel CH, Mukhopadhyay T (1995) Information technologies and business value – an analytical and empirical investigation. Information Systems Research 6(1):3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benaroch M, Jeffery M, Kauffman RJ, Shah S (2007) Option-based risk management: a field study of sequential information technology investment decisions. Journal of Management Information Systems 24:103–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndt ER, Morrison CJ (1995) High-tech capital formation and economic performance in US manufacturing industries: an exploratory analysis. Journal of Econometrics 65:9–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly 24(1):169–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj A, Bharadwaj SG, Konsynski BR (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Science 45(7):1008–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj A, Keil M, Mahring M (2009) Effects of information technology failures on the market value of firms. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 18(2):66–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt GD, Grover V (2005) Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: an empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems 22(2):253–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E (1993) The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM 36(12):66–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E (1996) The contribution of information technology to consumer welfare. Information Systems Research 7(3):281–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science 42(4):541–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2000) Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4):23–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Yang S (1996) Information technology and productivity: a review of the literature. Advances in Computers 43:179–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Yang S (1999) The intangible costs and benefits of computer investments: evidence from the financial markets. In: Proc international conference on information systems, Atlanta

  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM, Yang S (2002) Intangible assets: how the interaction of computers and organizational structure affects stock market valuations. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 33(2002-1):137–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd TA, Turner DE (2000) Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure: exploratory analysis of a construct. Journal of Management Information Systems 17(1):167–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr NG (2003) IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Business Review 81(5):41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan YE (2000) IT value: the great divide between qualitative and quantitative and individual and organizational measures. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(4):225–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Chari MDR, Devaraj S, David P (2008) The impact of information technology investments and diversification strategies on firm performance. Management Science 54(1):224–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee D, Richardson VJ, Zmud RW (2001) Examining the shareholder wealth effects of new CIO position announcements. MIS Quarterly 25(1):43–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee D, Pacini C, Sambamurthy V (2002) The shareholder-wealth and trading-volume effects of information-technology infrastructure investments. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(2):7–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau PYK, Kuan KKY, Liang TP (2007) Research on IT value: what we have done in Asia and Europe. European Journal of Information Systems 16(3):196–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemons EK, Row MC (1991) Sustaining IT advantage – the role of structural differences. MIS Quarterly 15(3):275–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper HM, Hedges LV (1994) The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davern MJ, Kauffman RJ (2000) Discovering potential and realizing value from information technology investments. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(4):121–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedrick J, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer KL (2003) Information technology and economic performance: a critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Computing Surveys 35(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehning B, Richardson VJ (2002) Returns on investments in information technology: a research synthesis. Journal of Information Systems 16(1):7–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehning B, Stratopoulos T (2002) DuPont analysis of an IT-enabled competitive advantage. The International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 3(3):165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone WH, McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3(1):60–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devaraj S, Kohli R (2000) Information technology payoff in the health-care industry: a longitudinal study. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(4):41–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewan S, Shi C, Gurbaxani V (2007) Investigating the risk-return relationship of information technology investment: firm-level empirical analysis. Management Science 53(12):1829–1842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos BL, Peffers KG, Mauer DC (1993) The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Information Systems Research 4(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeny DF, Ives B (1990) In search of sustainability: reaping long-term advantage from investments in information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems 7(1):27–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink L, Neumann S (2009) Exploring the perceived business value of the flexibility enabled by information technology infrastructure. Information & Management 46(2):90–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd SW, Wooldridge B (1990) Path analysis of the relationship between competitive strategy, information technology, and financial performance. Journal of Management Information Systems 7(1):47–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable GG, Sedera D, Chan TZ (2008) Re-conceptualizing information system success: the IS-impact measurement model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9(7):377–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes DC, Hunton JE, Reck JL (2001) Market reaction to ERP implementation announcements. Journal of Information Systems 15(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt L, Brynjolfsson E (1994) The three faces of IT value: theory and evidence. In: Proc 15th international conference on information systems, Vancouver

  • Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly 20(2):121–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Dow KE, Grover V (2001) A reexamination of IT investment and the market value of the firm – an event study methodology. Information Systems Research 12(1):103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irani Z (2002) Information systems evaluation – navigating through the problem domain. Information & Management 40(1):11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irani Z, Love PED (2001) The propagation of technology management taxonomies for evaluating investments in information systems. Journal of Management Information System 17(3):159–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Irani Z, Love PED (2002) Developing a frame of reference for ex-ante IT/IS investment evaluation. European Journal of Information Systems 11(1):74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW (2001) Information technology and the US economy (Presidential address to the American Economic Association). American Economic Review 91(1):1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW, Stiroh KJ (1995) Computers and growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3:295–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW, Stiroh KJ (2000) Raising the speed limit: US economic growth in the information age. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1(1):125–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi J, Somers TM, Bhattacherjee A (2007) The role of information systems resources in ERP capability building and business process outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems 24:221–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman RJ, Weill P (1989) An evaluative framework for research on the performance effects of information technology investment. In: Proc 10th international conference on information systems, Boston

  • Kelley MR (1994) Productivity and information technology – the elusive connection. Management Science 40(11):1406–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim D, Cavusgil ST, Calantone RJ (2006) Information system innovations and supply chain management: channel relationships and firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(1):40–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko M, Bryson KM (2002) A regression tree based exploration of the impact of information technology investments on firm level productivity. In: Proc European conference on information systems

  • Ko M, Osei-Bryson KM (2004) Using regression splines to assess the impact of information technology investments on productivity in the health care industry. Information Systems Journal 14(1):43–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli R, Grover V (2008) Business value of IT: an essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9(1):23–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Li MF, Ye LR (1999) Information technology and firm performance: linking with environmental, strategic and managerial contexts. Information & Management 35(1):43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin WT, Shao BBM (2006b) Assessing the input effect on productive efficiency in production systems the value of information technology capital. International Journal of Production Research 44(9):1799–1819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin WT, Shao BBM (2006a) The business value of information technology and inputs substitution: the productivity paradox revisited. Decision Support Systems 42(2):493–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loveman GW (1994) An assessment of the productivity impact of information technologies. In: Allen TJ, Scott-Morton MS (Hrsg) Information technology and the corporation of the 1990s: research studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood MA, Mann GJ (1993) Measuring the organizational impact of information technology investment: an exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems 10(1):97–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood MA, Mann GJ (2005) Information technology investments and organizational productivity and performance: an empirical investigation. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 15(3):185–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier R, Hädrich T (2001) Modell für die Erfolgsmessung von Wissensmanagementsystemen. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 43(5):497–509

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlan FW (1981) Portfolio approach to information systems. Harvard Business Review 59(5):142–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Review: information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly 28(2):283–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville N, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer K (2007) The productivity impact of information technology across competitive regimes: the role of industry concentration and dynamism. Decision Support Systems 43(1):229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon NM, Lee B, Eldenburg L (2000) Productivity of information systems in the healthcare industry. Information Systems Research 11(1):83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens P, Anselstätter R, Eckhardt T, Nickel R (1982) Betriebswirtschaftliche Nutzeffekte und Schäden der EDV – Ergebnisse des NSI-Projektes. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 52(2):135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal N, Nault BR (2009) Investments in information technology: indirect effects and information technology intensity. Information Systems Research 20(1):140–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Money A, Tromp D, Wegner T (1988) The quantification of decision support benefits within the context of value analysis. MIS Quarterly 12(2):223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neirotti P, Paolucci E (2007) Assessing the strategic value of information technology: an analysis on the insurance sector. Information & Management 44(6):568–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliner SD, Sichel DE (2000) The resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: is information technology the story? Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research. A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research 12(2):121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pare G, Bourdeau S, Marsan J, Nach H, Shuraida S (2008) Re-examining the causal structure of information technology impact research. European Journal of Information Systems 17(4):403–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccoli G, Ives B (2005) Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly 29(4):747–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston R, Grabski S (2000) The impact of enterprise resource planning systems on firm performance. In: Proc international conference on information systems

  • Potthof I (1998) Empirische Studien zum wirtschaftlichen Erfolg der Informationsverarbeitung. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 40(1):54–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai A, Patnayakuni R, Patnayakuni N (1997) Technology investment and business performance. Communications of the ACM 40(7):89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravichandran T, Lertwongsatien C (2005) Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: a resource-based perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(4):237–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravichandran T, Liu Y, Han S, Hasan I (2009) Diversification and firm performance: exploring the moderating effects of information technology spending. Journal of Management Information Systems 25(4):205–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach SS (1987) America’s technology dilemma: a profile of the information economy. Morgan Stanley, Special Economic Study

  • Roach SS (1991) Services under siege: the restructuring imperative. Harvard Business Review 39(2):82–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockart JF (1979) Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Review 57(2):81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose JM, Rose AM, Norman CS (2004) The evaluation of risky information technology investment decisions. Journal of Information Systems 18(1):53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salipante P, Notz W, Bigelow J (1982) A matrix approach to literature reviews. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (Hrsg) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Santhanam R, Hartono E (2003) Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quarterly 27(1):125–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann M (1990) Abschätzung von Nutzeffekten zwischenbetrieblicher Informationsverarbeitung. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 32(4):307–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann M (1993) Wirtschaftlichkeitsbeurteilung für IV-Systeme. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 35(2):167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon PB, Patnayakuni R, Bowtell M (1999) Dimensions of information systems success. Communications of the AIS 2(3):1–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih E, Kraemer KL, Dedrick J (2007) Determinants of country-level investment in information technology. Management Science 53(3):521–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sircar S, Turnbow JL, Bordoloi B (1998) The impact of information technology investments on firm performance: a review of the literature. The Journal of Engineering Valuation and Cost Analysis 1(3):171–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Sircar S, Turnbow JL, Bordoloi B (2000) A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(4):69–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh C, Markus ML (1995) How IT creates business value: a process theory synthesis. In: Proc 16th international conference on information systems, Amsterdam

  • Stickel E (1995) Wettbewerbsorientierte Informationssysteme und Produktivitätsparadoxon. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 37(6):548–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiroh KJ (2002) Information technology and the US productivity revival: what do the industry data say? American Economic Review 92(5):1559–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiroh K, Botsch M (2007) Information technology and productivity growth in the 2000s. German Economic Review 8(2):255–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stratopoulos T, Dehning B (2000) Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox? Information & Management 38(2):103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramani M, Walden E (2001) The impact of e-commerce announcements on the market value of firms. Information Systems Research 12(2):135–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swierczek FW, Shrestha PK (2003) Information technology and productivity: a comparison of Japanese and Asia-Pacific banks. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 14(2):269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylla C, Wen HJ (2002) A conceptual framework for evaluation of information technology investments. International Journal of Technology Management 24(2–3):236–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam KY (1998) The impact of information technology investments on firm performance and evaluation: evidence from newly industrialized economies. Information Systems Research 9(1):85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher ME, Oliver JR (2001) The impact of technology investments on a firm’s production efficiency, product quality, and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(2):17–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher ME, Pingry DE (2004) An economic model of product quality and IT value. Information Systems Research 15(3):268–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbach N, Smolnik S, Riempp G (2009) Der Stand der Forschung zur Erfolgsmessung von Informationssystemen – Eine Analyse vorhandener mehrdimensionaler Ansätze. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 51(4):363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter SG, Spitta T (2004) Approaches to the ex-ante evaluation of investments into information systems. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 46(3):171–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan Z, Fang Y, Wade M (2007) The ten-year odyssey of the IS productivity paradox – a citation analysis (1996–2006). In: Proc Americas conference on information systems, Keystone

  • Watson RT (2001) Introducing MISQ Review – a new department in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly 25(1):103–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly 26(2):XIII–XXIII

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrmann A, Zimmermann S (2005) Integrierte Ex-ante-Rendite-/Risikobewertung von IT Investitionen. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 47(4):247–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrmann A, Heinrich B, Seifert F (2006) Quantitatives IT-Portfoliomanagement. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 48(4):234–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill P (1992) The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: a study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research 3(4):307–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill P, Olson M (1989) Managing investment in information technology: mini case examples and implications. MIS Quarterly 13(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West LA, Courtney JF (1993) The information problems in organizations – a research model for the value of information and information systems. Decision Sciences 24(2):229–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White HD (1994) Scientific communication and literature retrieval. In: Cooper HM, Hedges LV (Hrsg) The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman D (1992) Information economics: a practical approach to valuing information systems. Journal of Information Technology 7(3):169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WITSA (2008) Global ICT spending tops $3.5 trillion: industry experiences subdued spending growth. http://www.witsa.org/press/Digital_Planet_Release_final.doc

  • Zahn E (1990) Informationstechnologie als Wettbewerbsfaktor. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 32(6):493–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Kraemer KL, Xu S, Dedrick J (2004) Information technology payoff in e-business environments: an international perspective on value creation of e-business in the financial services industry. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(1):17–54

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Schryen.

Additional information

Angenommen nach zwei Überarbeitungen durch Prof. Dr. Buxmann.

This article is also available in English via http://www.springerlink.com and http://www.bise-journal.org: Schryen G (2010) Preserving Knowledge on IS Business Value. What Literature Reviews Have Done. Bus Inf Syst Eng. doi: 10.1007/s12599-010-0111-y.

Zusätzliche Information

Ergänzendes Onlinematerial kann unter folgendem Link abgerufen werden.

(PDF 52.3KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schryen, G. Ökonomischer Wert von Informationssystemen. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 52, 225–237 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-010-0232-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-010-0232-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords